futurewidow posted:

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:
can we go back to the part where goldsmith said he raped some chicks or something and he felt bad about it so now no one should have sex w/ someone they don't love?

i missed this entirely

i would like to know more about this.

Cycloneboy posted:
i doubt you'd understanding them.

lmao yes i doubt youd understanding something that i pay people to do for me

Groulxsmith posted:
you know i don't really mind being called out for that post especially in a forum with people who know better but post a lot of postmodern garbage (or even nonsense about free will) that justifies doing whatever they want in the sexual realm

what is the nonsense about free will

Crow posted:

Groulxsmith posted:
you know i don't really mind being called out for that post especially in a forum with people who know better but post a lot of postmodern garbage (or even nonsense about free will) that justifies doing whatever they want in the sexual realm

what is the nonsense about free will

i don''t remember if it was this thread or the prostitution one but it was a pretty strong implicit endorsement of the idea that if two people ~want~ sex that's good enough

Crow posted:
Explain the mathematics to me, that's my area of expertise. Also, discipline is studying financialization, so I imagine she probably knows more about the effect your blood money has on humanity than you can begin to suspect.

80k at 9% post-inflation AAR w/ additions of 11.5k (45k*.7-20k) every year will produce an account with ~1M after 20 years. 1M w/ a perpetuity of 2% grants 20k per year, every year, until the stars burn out.

Cycloneboy posted:

Crow posted:
Explain the mathematics to me, that's my area of expertise. Also, discipline is studying financialization, so I imagine she probably knows more about the effect your blood money has on humanity than you can begin to suspect.

80k at 9% post-inflation AAR w/ additions of 11.5k (45k*.7-20k) every year will produce an account with ~1M after 20 years. 1M w/ a perpetuity of 2% grants 20k per year, every year, until the stars burn out.

Now here's what you're gonna do. You're gonna calculate the monotonic series that converges on the point (∞) at which you become a worthless counterrevolutionary and revisionist in every sense of the word, completely rejecting even the label 'communist'. k=80,000 btw, and you can only show your work dialectically (which i suspect you are not capable of)

Cycloneboy posted:

discipline posted:
Cyclonebaby please describe in 250 words your ideal world

everyone lives forever and pain is nonexistent.

socialism- an indefinite status quo with no consequences

Goethestein posted:
i have been asking for three years now and no one has been able to competently explain why the workers paradise is superior to transhumanism.

pretty much almost everyone here is above your level of competence

transhumanism, in its fantasy manifestation, is fear of death, and thus will end in a much greater disaster than a conception of 'workers' paradise'

the reason why transhumanism is pathetic, is that it rests on that obsessive and weak fear, which drives most cowardly and 'evil' actions. if you mean transhumanism in the sense of aiming at realizing the truth of humanity's potential, and not a baying and baahing of frightened sheep, then there's nothing wrong with it. if you mean it in the popular expression, it is pathetic and will be wiped out by stronger, more truthful people and ideas.

why do you think loser nerds are so obsessed with it? you can't build any strong foundation on fear, i don't care if you personally share that fear. youre hands will be to shakey.