Well when you shitpost like this, I'll just ask you to explain why Social Security is a good thing because it transfers wealth from blacks to whites.
http://www.rhizzone.net/forum/topic/11593/
Edited by blinkandwheeze ()
i am positive this has never ever happened
You've done it yourself, you complain when my posts are "boring" or "long" or "too many graphs".
yeah i'll just try to get a bunch of socialists to defend democratic party policy (on dishonest terms no less) because i have no idea what socialism is ?????
As long as you oppose actually existing social security (hereafter referred to as "social security") we have no disagreement.
No more internet until you finish your homework
ghfghfgh posted:mustang, your arguments for ____ have all been proven to be trash. No matter how badly your ideas fail in reality you'll still keep forcing them on other people.
i agree
and???? go on????????
That's all, birth control is racial eugenics.
i agree
I've cited the fact that welfare increases poverty, you need to show where you've "trashed my argument".
I'm still waiting on your book report on Das Kapital, mustang.
That was it. The "contradictions" of capitalism are problems with human nature that exist under any economic system.
If you want my usual criticisms of Das Kapital they're here-
http://www.rhizzone.net/forum/topic/4771/lofi/?page=4
The problem with this definition is that it doesn't really justify the slave morality Marxism advocates. For example, some managers make millions of dollars in salary which is counted as wage income. Likewise, some companies pay their production line employees in profit sharing schemes. Even janitors can receive most of their wage in "surplus value" even though the distinction between stock dividends and wages is academic in this case. And there are things like self-employment and freelancing which blur categorization entirely.
If we use your definition of surplus value it actually doesn't do much to advance the social revolution or whatever. We're back to the problem of the Marxist concept of exploitation just being a way to feel morally superior to people who make more money than you. But I don't accuse you of this, because I think you honestly tried to make the concept of surplus value valid.
Edited by blinkandwheeze ()
i've read that "jumping to conclusions" is characteristic of autistic and schizophrenic thought
If you don't think birth control is eugenic then take it up with Margaret Sanger.
I'm going to make another shitpost, get ready.
Lysenko posted:i can't remember the last time i actually read a mustang post
He's one of those posters that really makes it hit home that the internet is used to warehouse the insane and the mentally stupid. Like he understands that his life is never going to be good as long as he continues alienating everyone he's in contact with but he isn't able to stop, in fact he actively makes it worse at all times. There is no underlying idea to anything he says, it's just a constant attempt to go through the motions of "intellectual" behavior to preserve his self-identity. Which is probably true of a lot of us, but he takes it to the point of self-harm.
it's just a constant attempt to go through the motions of "intellectual" behavior to preserve his self-identity.
I don't care about that. Actually most of the stuff I've seen here is just drivel and people trying to sound smart using marxist terms.
Anyways you're just evading the argument, you still haven't proven welfare doesn't increase poverty or whatever.
5sdfgdfg posted:Anyways you're just evading the argument, you still haven't proven welfare doesn't increase poverty or whatever.
I will never be able to prove that welfare doesn't increase "poverty or whatever." If I could, I wouldn't share it with you, I would go speak at a TED conference.
Here's the Marxo-World Bank right back at that.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/36627-world-bank-releases-world-development-indicators-2007
Edited by jools ()
You don't crack the 3 million most popular websites without making a few enemies.