it's arguably silly to get worked up over fascism or protofascism or whatever you want to want to call his particular flavor of rightism when we're talking about a country built on bones by slaves that destroys another country every five years. but imo trump nonetheless presents something new, bad, and ugly and things can always get worse
most of the mainstream accusations of trump being fascist misunderstand the situation and wouldn't be able to spot real fascism if a boot was on their neck, but that doesn't mean there's not a genuine danger.
http://www.answercoalition.org/chicago_march_11_mass_protest_to_stop_trump
swampman posted:The cable news argument that they are a fascist is that they don't care about black people, and flout the law, lol
that's why im particularly interested in the thoughts of comrades on the rhizzone. 'fascism' in bourgeois pop culture and political science doesn't seem particularly well-defined. trump is interesting to me because he displays some potential signs of fascism... anti-intellectualism, rebirth of the nation, etc. yet on something like foreign policy (e.g. cuba) he seems consistently to the left of other republican candidates (and often hillary)
i find it interesting, can we think of the other candidates as potentially fascist?. bhpn has a couple good posts on the current election and fascism in the sanders thread too. maybe i just haven't read enough stuff about fascism to judge. what i see in other places "loud racist = hitler" rings hollow to me...
Edited by le_nelson_mandela_face ()
It would need that plus military worship to complete the fascist dyad—the militarism is obviously possible in America, but Trump doesn't conjure the army enough in his politics and he most likely wouldn't turn his presidency into a true junta.
As it is, he is just a far-rightist. Abdel el-Sisi is more fascist in any true sense than Trump could ever be.
Cheers.
Edited by COINTELBRO ()
COINTELBRO posted:Fascism is categorically impossible in America because there is no nobiliary aristocracy and a monarchist tradition for fascists to draw from.
It would need that plus military worship to complete the fascist dyad—the militarism is obviously possible in America, but Trump doesn't conjure the army enough in his politics and he most likely wouldn't turn his presidency into a true junta.
As it is, he is just a far-rightist. Abdel el-Sisi is more fascist in any true sense than Trump could ever be.
Cheers.
Donald Trump (Paternal Autocrat)
Organisation regain -5%
Peacetime Belligerence -0.4 per month
Alliance chance with Democracies +30%
The Barking Buffoon is a great political dramatic actor. People see him as a strong and competent leader who will save the nation and restore it to its historical greatness. But behind his mask of bombastic rhetoric hides a weak-minded, vain simpleton. Those who really know him, know he is an incompetent man.
Flappo posted:COINTELBRO posted:
Fascism is categorically impossible in America because there is no nobiliary aristocracy and a monarchist tradition for fascists to draw from.
It would need that plus military worship to complete the fascist dyad—the militarism is obviously possible in America, but Trump doesn't conjure the army enough in his politics and he most likely wouldn't turn his presidency into a true junta.
As it is, he is just a far-rightist. Abdel el-Sisi is more fascist in any true sense than Trump could ever be.
Cheers.
Donald Trump (Paternal Autocrat)
Organisation regain -5%
Peacetime Belligerence -0.4 per month
Alliance chance with Democracies +30%
The Barking Buffoon is a great political dramatic actor. People see him as a strong and competent leader who will save the nation and restore it to its historical greatness. But behind his mask of bombastic rhetoric hides a weak-minded, vain simpleton. Those who really know him, know he is an incompelmaotent man.
lmao hoi am i right 4 life ninja
Panopticon posted:oh yeah, in a recent revision you also get civil wars of varying sizes if you dont purge your officers fully
but we don't take well to revisionism round these parts
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:People overestimate how comparatively bad trump is. Which is not to say he's not a lunatic, just that people forget how insane the other republicans are. The only thing that sets Trump apart from republican consensus is opposition to free trade, and this and his refusal to bow to the kingmakers is almost solely what's driving republican establishment backlash. His positions on torture, war, taxes, illegal immigration and so on are within or not that far outside the elected-official consensus, and demonstrably not outside the opinions of the rank-and-file Republican
lol if you take trump's non-immigration/trade/culture war pronouncements even slightly seriously. he can will and has changed them on a dime; one week he's aping pat buccanan on foreign policy, the next he's calling for thirty thousand ground troops to ~~take out~ ISIS. he doesn't have positions, he has whatever sounded good the last time it came up at a rally or debate
Edited by c_man ()
cars posted:i thought that's why we all started posting together?