discipline posted:
what do you think about black face
if you can think of another way to increase cultural representation of black peoples experiences then id like to hear it!
spike lee's bamboozled as evidence that blackface is not inherently racist.
discipline posted:
what do you think about black face
what response is going to make people qqingest. thats literally all i care about these days
deadken posted:
angry boys also has blackface & i actually got in an argue w/ a friend about it, he said he knew a black guy who didnt mind so it was ok
chris lilley also did a show called summer heights high, and he played both a gay man and a girl
you know, my impression is that it's not simply the fact that someone is portraying some other class, or race, or sex, or whether its art or not, but the meaning of the character. not the intention, but the act. theoretically, there could be some portrayal of blackface that isnt damaging, perhaps maybe John Safran's Race Relations where he does blackface or a movie about Black Like Me, where the person isnt some ridiculous caricature, but has a dimension which enunciates the meaning of race relations and the terrible force of oppression.
like when people defend blackface, its some idiotic magical Moor or something in Denmark, or some morons in Australia making light of a pop star, but not anything that fundamentally denounces white supremacy in the act
what would be kinda cool would be to have a play based on a black family and make one of the actors white /w a good mask or blackface and have the reviewers and audience guess who was whitey.
discipline posted:
It's not about writing in your "comfort zones" so much as you writing in zones that make, let's say, female rape victims terribly uncomfortable. You are writing strength and truth from that zone too, not because of how you feel necessarily but (once again) because of the gendered position you occupy.
lmao if you expect imp (or any dudes really) to give a shit
Edited by futurewidow ()
still though I see this as a problem of such abstraction, such overall disconnect with gendered violence that it can be reduced to like... a device some first world dude can use in his book to make a point or to make a character more interesting. it's not even like there's any new insight being gleaned. the fact that that's seemingly acceptable is makin me smh. It's lazy and it's decadent.
basically
Crow posted:
No, it's art alright, but art doesnt get a free pass from censorship
deadken posted:
blackface should be understood as an incipient becoming-other, a revolutionary act
babyfinland posted:
dead ken and imp are total retards, dont know what theyre talking about, dont understand the works of the names they drop, should die
Agreed.
deadken posted:babyfinland posted:
dead ken and imp are total retards, dont know what theyre talking about, dont understand the works of the names they drop, should dieAgreed.
disagreed. it may be objectively true but not if it's coming out of baby finland. hes a mega squirt
tpaine posted:Impper posted:
baby finland is a turd nuggethe's a white hot mess and a major league cuntastrophe, a stepin felchit for the pomo generation if there ever was one
Truer words ne'r done been spoke
Impper posted:
baby finland is a turd nugget
also agreed