Ironicwarcriminal posted:i had a beer with McCaine last night, he's cool
did you really? are you in england? give jools a dap on my behalf
The New Institutionalist Economic History: A Marxist Critique
Matthijs Krul, Friday 11.15am
In mainstream contemporary economic history, two methodological approaches are currently
predominant: Cliometrics and the New Institutionalist Economic History (NIEH). While the
former limits itself to positivist quantification, the latter provides an increasingly influential
theoretical framework for interpreting economic change. The NIEH, as developed in the work
of Douglass North, Barry Weingast, Avner Greif and others, returns to answering the
questions posed first by such thinkers as Karl Marx and Karl Polanyi in understanding the
relationship between structural changes in the economy and the social relations of which the
economy forms a part. Its attempt to revive a research programme around the ' embeddedness'
of the economic in social institutions constitutes a considerable step forward in moving
mainstream research toward historical questions interesting to Marxists. But there has been
little Marxist engagement with the NIEH.
This paper attempts to provide such a critical engagement. In this paper, I will argue that
despite the innovative manner in which North and others have gone beyond neoclassical
economics, this theoretical heritage nonetheless limits its usefulness as systematic social and
historical theory. The NIEH still uncritically adopts a framework in which market phenomena
and market metaphor form the backbone of the conceptual apparatus. Because of this, I will
argue the NIEH's philosophy of society reintroduces a Smithian 'invisible hand', but at the
level of social institutions, allowing the NIEH to fulfil the same political and
historiographical purpose as the Whiggish history of old did. Using a Marxist critique of
markets and market metaphor, I will evaluate the NIEH's historical problematic and suggest
ways in which the NIEH approach can and should be integrated into a Marxist theoretical
register.
Goethestein posted:Must be nice to be able to drop $1000 us and a full week to go to a glorified anime con
people who are training to be professors (professional otaku) sometimes have to give conference papers (fansubs) in order to build credibility within their field of study (ranma 1/2)
Goethestein posted:Must be nice to be able to drop $1000 us and a full week to go to a glorified anime con
it's fully paid for by the university but yes, even grad students making a nominal wage of like twelve grand a year are made in the shade imo
eccentricdeathmongrel posted:Haha dudebro. Nice one. Ace purpose.
http://gyazo.com/c9522ba430b2d62f7c15b65ac6e98fe6.png
some guy says "hey not to be antisemitic or anything but israelis seem pretty racist" which would not raise a hackle in any leftist group i have ever heard of, some israeli whines about it with the implication that it's shocking and idiotic to the degree of reddit's pederasty and perpetual hatred of women and black people, i dispute this and am banned. cool stuff
eccentricdeathmongrel posted:Haha dudebro. Nice one. Ace purpose.
that's the best and only good forum on reddit. it's exactly like old wddp lf but even more exclusive and aggressive
Keven posted:Im also the mod.
find a getfiscal post and then press the "force user logout" button repeatedly. once you grow tired, set up a plastic drinking bird to continually depress your mouse button
thanks mod man
discipline posted:animedad posted:discipline i liked your paragraph about moscow on ur tumblr
thanks. I had a weird time
wheres your tumblr
"I have a dream, that one day we will secure the existence of our people and a future for our little black boys and black girls to be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers"