"I have strange limits. I am very – OK, another detail, fuck it. I was never able to do – even if a woman wanted it – annal sex." Annal sex? "Ah, anal sex. You know why not? Because I couldn't convince myself that she really likes it. I always had this suspicion, what if she only pretends, to make herself more attractive to me? It's the same thing for fellatio; I was never able to finish into the woman's mouth, because again, my idea is, this is not exactly the most tasteful fluid. What if she's only pretending?"
cleanhands posted:he sounds like an attentive and considerate lover, like all revolutionaries must be
You can’t be a good lover if you’re scared of your own shadow
The sentiment Zizek expresses there is, in fact, a roundabout form of slut-shaming
vote syriza
Jerthebear posted:left-libertarianism makes no sense.
wow my god really? *tears down chomsky posters, moves on with life due to powerful argument*
getfiscal posted:Jerthebear posted:
left-libertarianism makes no sense.
wow my god really? *tears down chomsky posters, moves on with life due to powerful argument*
Nah he’s got a good point, left-libertarianism is pretty dumb. Liberty is all about freedom and achieving freedom means being able to exploit or lord power over others to get what you want. I don’t know how that’s supposed to be compatible with egalitarianism.
Jerthebear posted:clever, but I wasn't trying to convince you of anything. didn't think many people were subscribers to chomsky's political ideologies, other than bros who watch political documentaries on netflix.
umm i watch political documentaries on netflix? also i'm a liberal, so of course i like chomsky?
babyfinland posted:is the cynical historical narrative in ancient aliens, that humanity is so locked into a brutish perpetual cycle of mere survival that any radical developmental break must be a gift from a demi-god alien race, not capitalist (anti-hegelian) ideology at its purest?
this but with God
THat is more or less the actual theory behind ancient aliens.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:babyfinland posted:is the cynical historical narrative in ancient aliens, that humanity is so locked into a brutish perpetual cycle of mere survival that any radical developmental break must be a gift from a demi-god alien race, not capitalist (anti-hegelian) ideology at its purest?
this but with God
the aliens didnt create man and the world though, man happily reproduces himself as in liberal and socialist theory, but doesnt progress, because he doesnt contain his own negation. he is man-as-such with no remainder
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:The narrative of ancient aliens is that a long time ago, as portrayed in Sumerian myth, a bunch of aliens came to earth to mine gold to replentish the gold deficiency in their planets atmosphere. After various failed experiments they successfully created man in a laboratory to be their slave laborers in the gold mines. They left but still continue to intervene in human history and provide humans with technology. Also every single miracle-type event or unexplainable phenomenon in every holy book of every religion is actually talking about one of mankinds encounters with aliens.
THat is more or less the actual theory behind ancient aliens.
oh they did create man? weird
They have a really weird ideology those guys
Ironicwarcriminal posted:They have a really weird ideology those guys
thats true of any and all americans. ftw.
babyfinland posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
They have a really weird ideology those guys
thats true of any and all americans. ftw.
That’s true but their beliefs are just so paranoid and unstructured, it’s not even built on something as solid as fundamentalist religion or racism.
babyhueypnewton posted:lol saying nietzsche didn't speak of politics is like saying Machiavelli didn't speak about politics because he didn't include bourgeois ethics in his prescriptions. also nietzsche going "crazy" is completely irrelevant and dismissing or modifying his work with that in mind is basically a way of dismissing radical thought as "crazy". see: Foucault (and again see him for more explicit politicizing of Nietzsche)
who are you talking to
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:I didn't dismiss his work on the grounds of him being batshit insane, which he obviously was, I said it was the best part about reading his work! It's all the things besides his insanity being so interesting that are the bad parts.
hmm interesting stuff, I'm sure you have a well developed definition of "insanity" and have thought carefully about your opinions
babyhueypnewton posted:EmanuelaOrlandi posted:I didn't dismiss his work on the grounds of him being batshit insane, which he obviously was, I said it was the best part about reading his work! It's all the things besides his insanity being so interesting that are the bad parts.
hmm interesting stuff, I'm sure you have a well developed definition of "insanity" and have thought carefully about your opinions
syphillis counts dude
babyfinland posted:babyhueypnewton posted:lol saying nietzsche didn't speak of politics is like saying Machiavelli didn't speak about politics because he didn't include bourgeois ethics in his prescriptions. also nietzsche going "crazy" is completely irrelevant and dismissing or modifying his work with that in mind is basically a way of dismissing radical thought as "crazy". see: Foucault (and again see him for more explicit politicizing of Nietzsche)
who are you talking to
sorry got to the party late, pretty rare nietzsche comes up in lf though and even rarer that he isn't immediately dismissed by liberals for being "racist" and "misogynistic" and/or "crazy"
Ironicwarcriminal posted:I’m increasingly coming around to the view that madness is actually the achievement of a higher state of existence, a cosmic truth that is at one with the incomprehensibility of the universe
historic late pass.