#41
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

mustang hack swirls account or is he just going on a boring trolling run for the hell of it?



whats a swirls account

#42
Post rating: ~

Urbandale posted:

Let's have a moment of silence for slaveowning aristocrats the world over



let's not

#43
Post rating: ~

gyrofry posted:

looking forward to the free east prussia thread



*tips fedora*

#44
Post rating: -

shriekingviolet posted:


#45
Post rating: ~

chickeon posted:

politics aside i think it's pretty silly to suggest that a 6 year old can be imprisoned for any longer than a single year??


dude i've been in prison my entire life

#46
Post rating: ~

Urbandale posted:

yeah house arrest is so terrible boo hoo


that is so terrible

#47
Kurdt
Post rating: +

methlabretriever posted:

chickeon posted:

politics aside i think it's pretty silly to suggest that a 6 year old can be imprisoned for any longer than a single year??

dude i've been in prison my entire life

#48
Post rating: ~
and that means that i've been a virgin all my life
#49
Post rating: ~
"In prison" get it?
#50
Kurdt
Post rating: ~
we've missed you cycloneman
#51
Post rating: ~
i dunno who cycloneman is
#52
Post rating: ~
who was the poster that used to be called like daddy cummies or w/e lmao, good shit
#53
Post rating: ~

Urbandale posted:

yeah house arrest is so terrible boo hoo


Most people need to move around the world and communicate with others to fulfill their needs as human beings. House arrest wasn't thought up to punish 21st century bubble boys/communists who chose a monastic life of video games, internet porn, and Dominos delivery.

#54
Post rating: ~

Panopticon posted:

who was the poster that used to be called like daddy cummies or w/e lmao, good shit


cars

#55
Post rating: ~
another mental breakdown on the 'zzone? when will it end...
#56
Post rating: +
methlabretriever is deafbypills, sendintheblackman, cycloneman, mustang, every white noise poster who posted too much
#57
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

methlabretriever is deafbypills, sendintheblackman, cycloneman, mustang, every white noise poster who posted too much



je suis mustang

#58
Post rating: +

swirlsofhistory posted:

https://www.studentsforafreetibet.org/get-involved/action-toolbox/a-lie-repeated-the-far-left2019s-flawed-history-of-tibet(Michael Parenti btfo)



ironically that "lie repeated 100 times" quote is itself... a lie, its variously attributed to goebbels or whoever and you cant find it in any of mao's published material etc

#59
Post rating: +
also im pretty sure theocracies tend not to be nation-states. i mean unless you just like granting the anachronistic claims of nationalist historians willy-nilly or something
#60
Post rating: ~
More important than whether pre-1950s Tibet was technically a nation state or not--there have always been countries larger and smaller than it which don't fit that model--is whether it was ever treated recognized by anybody as a sovereign entity independent from China in modern times. The overwhelming evidence is no.
#61
[account deactivated]
#62
Post rating: ~
its internalised paedophilia
#63
Post rating: +
to fully internalize it, you must put the children into the daddy holes
#64
Post rating: ~
go, go, go beyond, go thoroughly beyond, and establish yourself in enlightenment
#65
Poronto
Post rating: ~
why does it matter what anyone wears or eats or drinks or watches or buys or says or does or thinks. are we not all sacks of shit filled meat
#66
Post rating: +
if you feed me, do I not poop?
#67
Post rating: +
(Shrugging helplessly) daddy need cummies.
#68
Post rating: ~

jools posted:

swirlsofhistory posted:

https://www.studentsforafreetibet.org/get-involved/action-toolbox/a-lie-repeated-the-far-left2019s-flawed-history-of-tibet(Michael Parenti btfo)



ironically that "lie repeated 100 times" quote is itself... a lie, its variously attributed to goebbels or whoever and you cant find it in any of mao's published material etc


It's not sourced, so it's not deliberately false, it's more like unintentionally misleading.

#69
Post rating: ~

jools posted:

also im pretty sure theocracies tend not to be nation-states. i mean unless you just like granting the anachronistic claims of nationalist historians willy-nilly or something


Where does it say that Tibet was a nation-state in the European sense? Also, this distinction is stupid to begin with and typical of everything I hate about historiography as it's taught now.

#70
Post rating: ~

swirlsofhistory posted:

jools posted:

also im pretty sure theocracies tend not to be nation-states. i mean unless you just like granting the anachronistic claims of nationalist historians willy-nilly or something

Where does it say that Tibet was a nation-state in the European sense? Also, this distinction is stupid to begin with and typical of everything I hate about historiography as it's taught now.



theres literally nothing but the nation-state in the european sense lol. and okay tell us whats so much better about your historiography, other than the fact it lets you heil hitler

#71
[account deactivated]
#72
Post rating: ~
idgi, what does henry kissenger have to do with the falun gong?
#73
Post rating: ~
Aside from the fact that he's already publicly come out against killing religious minorities
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8227173/Henry-Kissinger-apologises-for-gas-chamber-comment.html
#74
Post rating: ~

swirlsofhistory posted:

jools posted:

also im pretty sure theocracies tend not to be nation-states. i mean unless you just like granting the anachronistic claims of nationalist historians willy-nilly or something

Where does it say that Tibet was a nation-state in the European sense? Also, this distinction is stupid to begin with and typical of everything I hate about historiography as it's taught now.



you mean a historiography in which concepts are defined and the material world is studied? why are you posting so shitty now? i mean, you were never a good poster but bro, check urself.

#75
Post rating: ~
#76
Post rating: ~

jools posted:

swirlsofhistory posted:

jools posted:

also im pretty sure theocracies tend not to be nation-states. i mean unless you just like granting the anachronistic claims of nationalist historians willy-nilly or something

Where does it say that Tibet was a nation-state in the European sense? Also, this distinction is stupid to begin with and typical of everything I hate about historiography as it's taught now.



theres literally nothing but the nation-state in the european sense lol. and okay tell us whats so much better about your historiography, other than the fact it lets you heil hitler


Why do you have to be so autistic about defining the word nation? Everyone can grasp based on the context of the response that it's about the country and the government of Tibet, the status of which is closely connected to the rights of Tibetans. Namaste.

#77
Post rating: ~

babyhueypnewton posted:

swirlsofhistory posted:

jools posted:

also im pretty sure theocracies tend not to be nation-states. i mean unless you just like granting the anachronistic claims of nationalist historians willy-nilly or something

Where does it say that Tibet was a nation-state in the European sense? Also, this distinction is stupid to begin with and typical of everything I hate about historiography as it's taught now.



you mean a historiography in which concepts are defined and the material world is studied? why are you posting so shitty now? i mean, you were never a good poster but bro, check urself.


Defining concepts is a way of restating ones prejudices, I think. To do history is to look at what what was said and done, and what reasons the individuals had for doing them. I don't know if that's the same as studying the material world... if you mean archaeology can contribute important facts, then yes, otherwise we aren't on the same page...

#78
UNUSUALY COOL
Post rating: ~

Panopticon posted:

who was the poster that used to be called like daddy cummies or w/e lmao, good shit



me.

#79
Post rating: ~

RedMaistre posted:

More important than whether pre-1950s Tibet was technically a nation state or not--there have always been countries larger and smaller than it which don't fit that model--is whether it was ever treated recognized by anybody as a sovereign entity independent from China in modern times. The overwhelming evidence is no.


China refused to recognize Sikkim as Indian until 2003 based on its one time status as a tributary vassal of the Qing. Things can change.

#80
UNUSUALY COOL
Post rating: +

swirlsofhistory posted:

China refused to recognize Sikkim as Indian until 2003 based on its one time status as a tributary vassal of the Qing.



so what, we've all made that mistake once or twice.