So not only are you fucking yourself and the working class, but you're distracting yourself from important work like communist revolution.
For example, an argument like "unions cause unemployment" is ignored, while "unions increase the reserve army of unemployed labor" is taken seriously.
They're the same argument, just one is phrased in leftard terminology.
Lucille posted:Radicalize Jews. They're already 100% of the way there.
more like free radicalize them through rapid exothermic oxidation am i rite
service industry employers are reserving the exclusive use of scheduled labor-time; they are not purchasing productivity as a discrete product. Price floors must necessarily exist for all time-exclusive, non-contemporaneous, non-independently-contracted employment, as the specific nature of the worker's value is not fractionable, dispersable, or multiplicable
Alright dude is that supposed to be like a refutation or something?
Lucille posted:service industry employers are reserving the exclusive use of scheduled labor-time; they are not purchasing productivity as a discrete product. Price floors must necessarily exist for all time-exclusive, non-contemporaneous, non-independently-contracted employment, as the specific nature of the worker's value is not fractionable, dispersable, or multiplicable
Alright dude is that supposed to be like a refutation or something?
well yeah
Lucille posted:Well then its just crap because it has nothing to do with anything.
Lucille posted:So what does that have to do with the minimum wage? Supervisory time imposes a cost floor on labor?
the minimum wage isnt establishing any value associated with labor. it is setting the universal value of reserving an hour of time, prior to any added labor value generated from productivity or expertise. Minimum wage is not a contingent fee
I mean your argument makes perfect sense from a Marxist perspective. The employment effects of the minimum wage are irrelevant, (modern) Marxism is all about destroying wealth.
Lucille posted:And this contests the point in the OP how?
employers who pay their workers minimum wage are not purchasing, and therefore are not entitled to, their actual labor
employers who pay their workers minimum wage are not purchasing, and therefore are not entitled to, their actual labor
So how does one "purchase their actual labor?"
Lucille posted:employers who pay their workers minimum wage are not purchasing, and therefore are not entitled to, their actual labor
So how does one "purchase their actual labor?"
pay them more gil
Superabound posted:test
pay them more gil
But workers are lazy and don't deserve anything.
Lucille posted:But workers are lazy and don't deserve anything.
"laziness" is a value statement describing labor and productivity. again, the minimum wage does not purchase labor or productivity, but time, a fixed commodity
"laziness" is a value statement describing labor and productivity. again, the minimum wage does not purchase labor or productivity, but time, a fixed commodity
So companies are paying workers to sit around and waste time?
Lucille posted:"laziness" is a value statement describing labor and productivity. again, the minimum wage does not purchase labor or productivity, but time, a fixed commodity
So companies are paying workers to sit around and waste time?
ones that do not pay their workers above minimum wage are, yes. Demonstrably
ones that do not pay their workers above minimum wage are, yes. Demonstrably
So they should be purged, to free the internet of their traffic.
Lucille posted:They do, minimum wage sets a price floor and requires them to lay off more people whose marginal productivity is below the new cost of labor.
F your economics. There reaches a point, where the business can't operate with any fewer laborers. As you economic fuckos say, something inelasticity, or whatever. For example a Mc Donalds cant operate without a cook and a cashier and a person answering drive through. Minimum wage $25 they still need those good honest folks, they are necessary for business to function. Your assumption that there exists a lot of jobs that are beneficial to fill only at $7/hr and can disappear when wage is raised, is just assumption. My assumption is that $7/hr is cash money and will already be eliminated by now by the cash money boss if possible. The Wal-Mart greeter can not be made redundant, it is an impossibility