Cuntessa_Markievicz posted:wow youre so edgy Populares for posting such an explicitly sexual image in a thread where sexual assault and male supremacy has been greatly discussed
I was albeit very poorly attempting to substantiate your point, the scene is from "Girls" It was an example of the "sex positive" bullshit spread by fauxfeminists such as Ms. Dunham. I apologize and the offending image will be removed.
Edited by Populares ()
Cuntessa_Markievicz posted:OMG FUCKING GOD WHEN GIRLS FIRST CAME OUT EVERYONE INCLUDING MY STUPID AS FUCK EX SAID LENA DUNHAM'S HUMOUR REMINDED THEM OF ME AND I HAVE ALWAYS DESPISED HER, I LITERALLY HAVE HATED THIS WOMAN SO FUCKING MUCH FOR BEING A MEDIOCRE WHITE UPPER MIDDLE CLASS WOMAN WHOSE SHIT LITERALLY GETS PICKED UP BY PRODUCTION COMPANIES AND BECOMES CULTS CLASSICS. I SWEAR TO GOD I WILL SMITE THIS FUCKER AND END HER CAREER.
Haha, nice post... reminds me of the comedic style of actress and writer Lena Dunham
page 23: just hanging out watching one of my friends squat and piss in the carpark and the piss is running all down the carpark and pooling around my feet and i CANOT stop laughing at the piiss you guys. posted from my ipHone using tapatalk
but i also greatly enjoyed the first season of girls before i realized that you were supposed to identify with the characters and their journey to Growing Up instead of holding them in hilarious contempt because It's Always Sunny in Brooklyn so what the fuck do i know
to get back on track you weirdos
While it is true that everyone - men, women, boys and girls, the elderly and the very young — is affected by poor sanitary conditions and infrastructure, women and girls are affected the most: it’s about our health, our dignity and our safety. It is also about our education and economic prospects. It is about basic human rights.
The indignity of a missing or dysfunctional toilet has health and personal safety consequences for girls and women, especially during their periods. More than 800 million women and girls between the ages of 15-49 are menstruating on any given day.
Millions of those don’t have access to good sanitary products, nowhere to dispose those products or wash themselves, coupled with very strong cultural taboos surrounding menstruation which prevent many from discussing the issue, or raising concerns publicly about having to use bathrooms more frequently during their period, or even just about having access to private bathrooms. In fact, women and girls who have no access to bathroom facilities spend 97 billion hours each year finding a place to go.
This double, triple whammy, or quadruple whammy, often leads to missing school days, missing work days, being at risk for sexual violence and being more susceptible to infections.
Openly discussing toilets or bodily functions are hard enough in many cultures. But menstruation is in a class by itself. Privacy, shame, cultural prohibitions and perceptions of impurity make conversations about menstruation taboo, hushed and limited to the underfunded offices of local water and health departments. One survey conducted in India, showed that an astonishing 70 percent of girls had no idea what was happening to them when they first got their period.
uncle sam, you're next buddy
rolaids posted:What will come of all these revelations? Doesn't seem like any of the harassers and abusers will suffer any consequences other than having to stay out of public life,
even that won't happen for many of them, they'll be hired on the side for all sorts of things all the time and show up at the exact same cocktail parties they did before until they're finally given a job roughly equivalent to their former status and their still-public presence resurfaces in the press since it's suddenly "news", then a muted conversation will start up among entertainment & "culture" writers over each person's "reemergence in the public eye" in pieces everyone responsible for hiring these guys will ignore because the writers' opinions now mean nothing to anyone in the business
Once those same people reach a consensus that the abuser is no longer a problem for raising capital, whether or not the abuser continues their abusive behavior, they will bring them back into the fold and there will be no serious resistance anywhere in the industry to their participation in anything. The entertainment press will deem them "controversial", and write their stories in that tone, until they get bored of it; this will have no substantial effect on the abusers' careers except maybe some of the actors will get edgier roles.
In the meantime, the remaining bigwigs will make sure that many of those abusers are still connected, well-paid and well-informed of what's going on through continued participation in the industry, because otherwise the chances of those bigwigs making money through those abusers in the future would be diminished.
The main reason behind this is because the best way to make money in that industry right now is to find someone who used to make you, or someone else, money, and put them out front, because that will lure investors and buyers. This doesn't change that.
And obviously, since a lot of the people throwing a tablecloth over these abusers are guilty of the same or worse, they will try to establish a precedent by keeping that timetable as short as possible for those currently accused.
So while some of these people's careers are likely toast, probably more of them won't see much of a difference at all in their lives.
JohnBeige posted:did we talk about how lena defended a rapist writer and herself raped her underage sister?
maybe she was maintaining democratic centralism
rolaids posted:So essentially
at the rate movies like this are happening and accreting more and more Stars, i predict that in 2021 there will only be one movie released and it will have every Star possible in it. the title will be Boss Baby 2
A: about 20 years
iam so fucking sick and tired of seeing supposed leftist men getting revealed or declare that they're into fucked up degrading sexual shit that they get off to subject women to.
why the fuck are fucking men so fucking dense when it fucking comes to sex and the power relations behind it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Petrol posted:Q: whats the difference between sam kriss and someone like matt lauer or garrison kiellor
A: about 20 years
Success? Money? Also you're off by like a decade
Edited by aerdil ()
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:all these dudes who want to jerk off in front of women i don't understand. like a guy who wants to parley his power into fucking beautiful actresses i understand. i'm not justifying the behavior, i'm just saying i understand the reasoning behind it. but jerking off in front of them? i can grasp the argument that it's a power play, but i can't watch myself doing it. all hunched over in a mirror, looking like a goblin, eheheheheh. the shame of it. incomprehensible
it's a fetish
Petrol posted:The implication was that another couple of decades of his career would lead to similar results.
since he never made anyone any real money anywhere i think we've reached peak Sam Kriss