roseweird posted:its such a stupid way to talk
don't troll
swampman posted:If you thought "hillarytars" were losing their minds, watch what happens when someone suggests these nerds find a second metaphor beside male impotence
i wonder how crazy impotent you have to be to still be impotent in the modern era with our wonderous pharmacology
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:did you downvote my post for using the word limpdick roseweird
i did for "stanning"
Petrol posted:publicly funded Vice tv channel
this is violence
chickeon posted:le_nelson_mandela_face posted:did you downvote my post for using the word limpdick roseweird
i did for "stanning"
chickeon posted:this is violence
Obama called Hillary and told her she had to concede https://t.co/iV2Ut8G5Gq pic.twitter.com/WGejUH72JU
— Peter Hamby (@PeterHamby) April 17, 2017
chickeon posted:le_nelson_mandela_face posted:did you downvote my post for using the word limpdick roseweird
i did for "stanning"
Fair.
"hillary's never been a leader in her life; she just has fans" — @ByYourLogic, more or less pic.twitter.com/7TDASptPMx
— robbymookisafraud (@garbagekate) April 18, 2017
after spying on her staff's emails, she decides to get a private server. mind blowing. pic.twitter.com/f8gxylEyZz
— robbymookisafraud (@garbagekate) April 19, 2017
tfw your political instincts are wrong yet again pic.twitter.com/OmiB6zYGXW
— robbymookisafraud (@garbagekate) April 19, 2017
Like yeah, duh, but even the idiot True Believer Democrat minions won't stop pissin' in the wind.
*entire first paragraph is a denunciation of Hugo Chavez*
Never in my life have I met anyone who has endured more crap and keeps going for all the right reasons than @HillaryClinton. pic.twitter.com/53nOJel428
— Nick Merrill (@NickMerrill) April 20, 2017
4700 likes
Wow pretty amazing that in this day and age you could live your whole life and ONLY meet Hillary Clinton
What Allen and Parnes captured in Shattered was a far more revealing portrait of the Democratic Party intelligentsia than, say, the WikiLeaks dumps. And while the book is profoundly unflattering to Hillary Clinton, the problem it describes really has nothing to do with Secretary Clinton.
The real protagonist of this book is a Washington political establishment that has lost the ability to explain itself or its motives to people outside the Beltway.
In fact, it shines through in the book that the voters' need to understand why this or that person is running for office is viewed in Washington as little more than an annoying problem.
In the Clinton run, that problem became such a millstone around the neck of the campaign that staffers began to flirt with the idea of sharing the uninspiring truth with voters. Stumped for months by how to explain why their candidate wanted to be president, Clinton staffers began toying with the idea of seeing how "Because it's her turn" might fly as a public rallying cry.
This passage describes the mood inside the campaign early in the Iowa race (emphasis mine):
"There wasn't a real clear sense of why she was in it. Minus that, people want to assign their own motivations – at the very best, a politician who thinks it's her turn," one campaign staffer said. "It was true and earnest, but also received well. We were talking to Democrats, who largely didn't think she was evil."
Our own voters "largely" don't think your real reason for running for president is evil qualified as good news in this book. The book is filled with similar scenes of brutal unintentional comedy.
i cant believe they're really doing the "Russia did Benghazi to set up Clinton" thing pic.twitter.com/GXMu2Pg8Uj
— Adam H. Johnson (@adamjohnsonNYC) April 20, 2017
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:What Allen and Parnes captured in Shattered was a far more revealing portrait of the Democratic Party intelligentsia than, say, the WikiLeaks dumps.
lmao
The crude conventional wisdom is that Bill Clinton craved adoration and Hillary Clinton craved power. But Chelsea Clinton seems to have a more crippling want: fashionability—of the sort embraced by philanthropic high society. So you tell The New York Times that your dream dinner party would include James Baldwin, Shakespeare, Franz Kafka, Albert Camus, Jane Jacobs, and Jane Austen, and discussion would be about how “people and communities can evolve to be more inclusive, more kind, have a greater and broader sense of solidarity, while still respecting individual liberties; what provokes or blocks those changes; and what stories might resonate today to encourage us toward kindness, respect, and mutual dignity.” You almost have bow down before someone who could host Shakespeare for dinner and make the agenda wind up sounding like a brochure for the Altria Group. At least Kafka would be on hand to capture the joy of the evening.
CAMUS: Quelle?
Edited by le_nelson_mandela_face ()
C. CLINTON: Yes, but aren't breasts progressive?
cars posted:J. BALDWIN: the troubles of white people are reminiscent of children crying because the breast has been taken away
C. CLINTON: Yes, but aren't breasts progressive?
lol
https://theoutline.com/post/1422/shattered-hillary-clinton-campaign
The campaign eventually chose to attack Sanders for his past criticism of Obama, a strategy that, disingenuous or not, won her points with the African-American voters who dominate the Democratic base in most of the South. Sanders lost, of course, and he eventually endorsed Clinton. However, the Clinton campaign considered his endorsement inauthentic because he refused to say her horrid slogan, “I’m With Her,” on camera (“That’s so phony,” Sanders reportedly said)
Edited by swampman ()