It seems to me that the motivation for the actions (or imagined actions) has more to do with narcissism (e.g. Allen as threat to Bateman's ego, prostitutes as disposable toys to be discarded after sadistic gratification, etc). Narcissism also suggests why he couldn't bring himself to kill Chloe Sevigny (her naive infatuation/adoration was ego-boosting).
The medium of fantastic extreme violence (real or imagined, sexualized or not) was a neurotic reaction to the conformity/repression of his social station and cultural milieu -- a subconscious attempt to break free and act authentically (which ironically turns out to be barely noticeable in the context of 1980s wall street/high society morality).
but that seems kind of a stretch
tpaine posted:
i haven't read the book, but is it possible that the director was making fun of it, like verhoeven did with starship troopers?
i think there is an element of that. the film is definitely superior. might be interesting to note harron and her co-screenwriter actually rejected a screenplay by ellis.
if i knew any id invite them round to watch it over a few beers; maybe ask them about huey lewis & the news too...
discipline posted:I saw it more as "you're worthless weak willed and disgusting" rather than filth/poverty... and obviously Patrick Bateman is obsessed with being worth something (Dorsia?) and not weak willed and being not disgusting. Nobody goes through a personal hygiene ritual like that without feeling like they are disgusting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A4Sju5NAdo#t=31s
"Well, maybe we shouldn't go out to dinner. I don't want to ruin your willpower."
"No it's alright, I'm not very good at controlling it anyway."
he tells the homeless man that he has "nothing in common" with him, but I dont think that's true.
The first illustrated murder, that of the homeless man, occurs immediately after the business card showdown. Having been belittled in another man's success narrative, he uses this murder to reassert his significance. It is perhaps not terribly coincidental that the homeless man's name is "Al." Bateman is made to feel subordinated and belittled by Paul Allen, who approaches him at the boardroom table and, standing over him, literally talks down to him. Bateman's response is to immediately seek out someone over whom he can assert his status. So, he uses the murder scene as an opportunity to assume the same dictatorial position over the seated Al, a temporary surrogate for Paul Allen in this status-oriented psychodrama.
gyrofry posted:The first illustrated murder, that of the homeless man, occurs immediately after the business card showdown. Having been belittled in another man's success narrative, he uses this murder to reassert his significance. It is perhaps not terribly coincidental that the homeless man's name is "Al." Bateman is made to feel subordinated and belittled by Paul Allen, who approaches him at the boardroom table and, standing over him, literally talks down to him. Bateman's response is to immediately seek out someone over whom he can assert his status. So, he uses the murder scene as an opportunity to assume the same dictatorial position over the seated Al, a temporary surrogate for Paul Allen in this status-oriented psychodrama.
so, he kills his double in the shadowy recesses and cracks of the city/his subconscious...