gwarp posted:quick, i need something good to watch, go.
The film is thus able exorcise the uncanny rigor mortis of the iconic 30s hero-player -rolling out the buzzwords of post-WWII psychology to condemn the aging man as an destructive authoritarian personality that parodies "real" American values, a hold over from an earlier time's childhood hang-ups. But at the same time it puts to scorn the scorner as the real decadent, the real sicko=because he "hates the Navy". Both the little Mussolini and the alienated artist are put to shame. But while the former could have been accommodated by a crew with more good will, the critical spirit of the latter has no natural role.on the ship of state. Thus the stage is set for the fresh faced Keiths of the world, models of healthy mindedness, the blandly unhaunted ones: the ideal servants of the resolute homogeneity of jingoistic imperial democracy.
Edited by RedMaistre ()
Keven posted:I watched it and loved it but had to jet like 10 min before the end to make a show & never watched it again because its like 3 hours long so I don't know how it ends. I think this made me immune to the complaints about it being confusing because I don't actually know what happens.
i guess it's a bit hard to follow the plot at points, but the main themes are pretty obvious, at least to people who post here. the complaints seem to come from apolitical film reviewers who don't know enough about 60s american political history to get the allusions
or something
Part 2 is good as well
getfiscal posted:animedad didn't like it, he said, although i think he just lurks now.
I sat next to some old timers in the movie theater and they shuffled out about halfway through, one of them even made the "through with you" gesture where you make the "psht" sound. It's the latest repackaging of irritating winks as well as sexist/racist themes, masquerading as a series of signs that, maybe or maybe not, once had meaning. 1/10
the other thing about them is that its an odd example of how a bourgeois reform can be used to tangibly benefit revolutionary organisations pretty easily
animedad posted:getfiscal posted:
animedad didn't like it, he said, although i think he just lurks now.
I sat next to some old timers in the movie theater and they shuffled out about halfway through, one of them even made the "through with you" gesture where you make the "psht" sound. It's the latest repackaging of irritating winks as well as sexist/racist themes, masquerading as a series of signs that, maybe or maybe not, once had meaning. 1/10
Goofy simply wishes to bond with his son through fishing, a traditional pastime, as he had done with his own father. It is neither parable nor allegory. Neither dog was molested, the material does not support this.
Urbandale posted:the other thing about them is that its an odd example of how a bourgeois reform can be used to tangibly benefit revolutionary organisations pretty easily
disagree.
Agnus_Dei posted:I watched this short Youtube video on the history of Charlemagne and found it to be presented in an enjoyable and informative fashion.
Part 2 is good as well
lmao. i've never been so disturbed by bizarre voice acting until now. holy shit.
jqRyttu190Q
It's got David Cross and Amy Sedaris in it, which is good, and made by PFFR, which is also very good, in my opinion. They made Wonder Showzen, and things like that, which are good. You can watch all of The Heart, She Holler on the Adult Swim site. If that doesn't work, it's also all on a private torrent site, called MySpleen, and I can give you an invite to that, if you PM me. God bless.
discipline posted:PFFR is the most revolutionary art collective to come from my culture/generation and I am proud of them and stand by their work 100%
lol this was also at the height of Iraq War hysteria too, damn
Lhu4T_vwxIU
Petrol posted:i've seen snippets of star trek while channel surfing and it seems like the kind of thing i'd really enjoy if i was autistic.
I'm sorry, does THIS seem autistic to you?