Crow posted:Yes
You will not summon tpaine this way. The search string is too short. Now answer the question.
Crow posted:Misogyny good. Come here baby. Tuppins.
as soon as i read this a pair of flies landed on my (female) body to have sex with eachother . they wont stoop
reggaelolita posted:Crow posted:Misogyny good. Come here baby. Tuppins.
as soon as i read this a pair of flies landed on my (female) body to have sex with eachother . they wont stoop
Crow posted:reggaelolita posted:Crow posted:Misogyny good. Come here baby. Tuppins.
as soon as i read this a pair of flies landed on my (female) body to have sex with eachother . they wont stoop
why is that woman posting all those dumb words instead of making a lot of money
getfiscal posted:Crow posted:reggaelolita posted:Crow posted:Misogyny good. Come here baby. Tuppins.
as soon as i read this a pair of flies landed on my (female) body to have sex with eachother . they wont stoop
why is that woman posting all those dumb words instead of making a lot of money
who says she isnt
deadken posted:
its probably a good idea to leave out literate english speaking men as an insubstantially small part of the pop
deadken posted:intelligent introspective people in the west tend to be mildly literate i think
Wrong. I've never read a book in my life cover to cover; I'm functionality illiterate. Though I'm ignorant and know nearly nothing, I am exceptionally intelligent, as evidenced by the fact I've never been wrong about anything -- I have the ideology of a genius.
AmericanNazbro posted:i think this is the first time i've seen a non-'incel looking gauche-bro' advocating for revolution. pretty cool, even if it's just basic level leftist polemics, it's cool that it's entering the space of mainstream discourse(?)
brand makes paxman look like a media-class chump here and it's great
deadken posted:no he doesn't he just gibbers his mockney burble and does the same thing everyone paxman interviews ends up doing where he just repeats the same three buzz phrases over and over again. when paxman says 'you're a very trivial man' he's completely on point.
yeah he should probably drone on like grandpa chomsky, maybe then he'll earn your respect. no thanks. i'm pro-brand.
deadken posted:yesterday i saw wang hui give a talk at goldsmiths and the room was full of attractive young revolutionary leftists, probably like 60% female, nodding and making notes as he talked about the formation of a revolutionary class through maoist practice so get out more i guess? communism is hip & cool & sexy
no i'm talking about like, existing within some popular media periphery. whenever i see someone on tv even closely challenging hegemonic ideology it's someone like alex jones or the like with gaudy aesthetics that causes people to reflexively cringe and if they are genuinely advocating a socialist position then the way they are presented or argue has the same effect. i'm not talking about an existence of attractive leftists thats moot and irrelevant, what i'm saying is there exists no maoist one direction -- that's the issue.
deadken posted:no he doesn't he just gibbers his mockney burble and does the same thing everyone paxman interviews ends up doing where he just repeats the same three buzz phrases over and over again. when paxman says 'you're a very trivial man' he's completely on point.
but the aesthetics...
roseweird posted:otoh yeah i get your point, the guy who does voices for pixar kids movies is advocating revolution on tv, i guess that couldn't have happened 10 years ago
He's a very famous comedian