#81
[account deactivated]
#82
yo could you not post at mustang19. it typically results in more mustang19 posts. tia
#83

judaism proper did not exist until the first millennium, during which it formed as a basically imperialist and patriarchal movement that destroyed many surrounding forms of canaanite religion (cults of baal, anat, asherah, ashtaroth) associated with the multicultural semitic tribes of the region, there is no mention of israel in history until an egyptian pharaoh brags about having pillaged some levantine tribe by this name in 1200 BC. there are 2000 years of religious history in egypt and mesopotamia and china prior to these developments, not to mention extensive inferences from preliterate archaeology elsewhere.



The historical record is really patchy at that point though, for example nobody knows much about Noah or the religions which influenced him other than that they borrowed a few things from the Babylonians.

Anyway this thread was a qualified success, I've laid bare Rhizzone's pro-Western cultural chauvinism and I'm still able to post.

#84
[account deactivated]
#85
We don't know how to interpret the archaeological record accurately. All those religious scrolls we found might just have been elaborate didoes.
#86
They werent?!?! Oh no, my supervisor is gonna kill me!
#87
[account deactivated]
#88
[account deactivated]
#89
Thanks, Roseweird. If I ever have any spare time on my hands I'll look into some Sumerian literature.
#90
56-63. O E-tar-sirsir, the lament is bitter, the lament made for you. O Ma-gu-ena, the lament is bitter, the lament made for you. O brick-built Isin, the lament is bitter, the lament made for you. O shrine Egal-maḫ, the lament is bitter, the lament made for you. O brick-built Unug, the lament is bitter, the lament made for you. O brick-built Eridug, the lament is bitter, the lament made for you. How long will your bitter lament grieve your lord who weeps? How long will your bitter lament grieve Nanna who weeps?

i guess the preferred lager
#91
[account deactivated]
#92

roseweird posted:

mustang19 posted:

elaborate didoes.

what does this mean



A ruse or deception. What did you think it meant?

early sumerian and egyptian religion was basically all about beer tbh



I think that's why Islam arose in Arabia rather than beer growing regions.

#93
[account deactivated]
#94
[account deactivated]
#95

i actually had no idea, i have just never heard this word. what do you mean, ruse or deception? do you mean the scrolls at nag hammadi? not my specialty but i have read a little about these, they make historical sense to me. the bible is a collection of writings collected into a book between 0 and 200 CE. of course there were other collections in existence at the time. they offer helpful context for understanding early christianity, gnosticism, and wisdom literature



I've honestly never read any of that, my entire ideology was formed from a Capitalism.org article "The Clueless Left And Islam". My apparent facade of addiction to Islamic literature came from having ten wikipedia tabs open at all times.

#96
[account deactivated]
#97
[account deactivated]
#98
It doesn't change anything, you're still a liberal cultural-imperialist.

Hopefully someday you'll get a business and be a Conscious Capitalist.



i actually had no idea, i have just never heard this word.



I actually typed in "all those ancient religious scrolls could just have been elaborate dildoes" and Mozilla autocorrected to dido.

Edited by mustang19 ()

#99
[account deactivated]
#100
[account deactivated]
#101
im doomed to be whitey
#102
roseweird please stop talking to mustang19.
#103
[account deactivated]
#104
he is on the spectrum. mystery solved
#105

roseweird posted:

i'm done i thought i could figure out what his weird deal is but i guess not. sorry all


he'd quote slayer if he think it was topical or would get a rise. he's just a kid.

#106

he'd quote slayer if he think it was topical or would get a rise. he's just a kid.



I'm still ten thousand times more in touch with reality than people who think Mohammed was some kind of liberal.

Edited by mustang19 ()

#107

roseweird posted:

mustang why are you trying to argue islam with non-muslims? for all i know muhammad did have a child bride. what the fuck do i care?



Surat Aţ-Idōl 65:4
"And as a sphere of flame it did burn, when Muhammed took Aisha as his bride. I am not the majnoun of any man. Come forth! And disturbeth the earth, whatsoever i accomplish."

#108

wasted posted:

roseweird posted:

i'm done i thought i could figure out what his weird deal is but i guess not. sorry all

he'd quote slayer if he think it was topical or would get a rise. he's just a kid.

slayer rules. rip hanneman. wimps and posers leave the hall.

#109
before you see the light, you must die

- allah (pbuh)
#110

mustang19 posted:

he'd quote slayer if he think it was topical or would get a rise. he's just a kid.

I'm still ten thousand times more in touch with reality than people who think Mohammed was some kind of liberal.



i hate to tell you this but the only person who ever cared enough about Islam to worry about which side of the American political spectrum Mohammed would have found himself on stopped posting here a long time ago

#111
[account deactivated]
#112

roseweird posted:

where do you get this stuff? who do you think believes this? WHO ARE YOU ARGUING WITH MUSTANG19


*clears throat, motions to my previous posts*

#113

roseweird posted:

mustang19 posted:

I'm still ten thousand times more in touch with reality than people who think Mohammed was some kind of liberal.

where do you get this stuff? who do you think believes this? WHO ARE YOU ARGUING WITH MUSTANG19



One of LF's defining characteristics is its amount of white adult converts to Islam with a guilty conscience who struggle to reconcile it with Western liberal conceptions such as leftism and feminism. Some try Rashidun Caliphate romanticism, blame backwardness on Arab culture, others align themselves with anti-imperialism and try to wish away everything else.

Chears.

#114
although the theory behind fascism is in the total subservience of all aspects of society to the state and its law, the actual implementation of fascism has always been utterly corrupt, with officials from the bottom to the top disregarding the rule of law (this is unavoidable in any kind of dictatorship, which is based around institutionalised arbitrariness embodied in the dictator). the precepts of fascism which are "good" in theory can all be adopted by a non-dictatorial system. that's why i'm more of a social-democrat than a fascist. class collaboration doesn't require a fuhrer.
#115
thats not really how fascism conceives of itself at all tbh. also why on earth do you have a GPCR poster as your avatar if you're a fuckin socdem lol
#116
woah less sectarianism please
#117
the total subservience of all aspects of society to the law is liberalism br0
#118
he's confusing the definition of totalitarianism with fascist corporatism which sounds sorta similar
#119

COINTELBRO posted:

One of LF's defining characteristics is its amount of white adult converts to Islam with a guilty conscience who struggle to reconcile it with Western liberal conceptions such as leftism and feminism. Some try Rashidun Caliphate romanticism, blame backwardness on Arab culture, others align themselves with anti-imperialism and try to wish away everything else.

Chears.



actually i think youll find that LF's defining characteri

#120
haha yea, that was a meme in lf. really takes me back.