DildoMalone posted:ows was the real world equivalent of every goon project where everybody wants to make posters and websites but nobody wants to do any actual work.
All that theory and no action
i dunno how the challenges & response of this generation compare to those before them tho
AmericanNazbro posted:this i claim, that the legitimacy of any movement is inversely proportional to the amount of white people in it
triple irony
"the revolution is surrender"
ggw posted:OWSers were just like fat goons sitting at home playing fantasy football, but then suddenly got the urge to put aside the spread sheets and take to the streets for a little two hand touch. Instead they found out they're horribly out of shape and got a bunch of skinned knees and bruises for nothing and went back to armchair quarterbacking. OWS's hearts were filled with the writings of Trotsky and other slavic scum, took to the streets to play out their revolutionary fantasies, but realized babyhueypnewton wasn't their friend and his dick stunk
Hmm great analysis really made me think
Yes, there is prison activism but it can't really do anything to stop the giant overwhelming beast that is the prison industrial complex in America. There are entire police departments propped up by the war on drugs and their ability to seize items and funds used by criminals. The only real prison activism that is making a meaningful impact has to do either with changing sentencing policies (rescinding Three Strikes amendments, alternative sentences rather than imprisonment, using day fines), specific drug related issues (like decriminalization, getting drug courts and other courts to rely on rehab rather than punishment), or changing current prison conditions (reducing overcrowding, meaningful work training programs, return of prison nurseries, etc). Individual jurisdictions, states, counties, all have their own policies that result in imprisonment that people might be trying to effect in those areas, but any national efforts are drops in a bucket.
The biggest constraints on the construction of new prisons are all budgetary and states like California have built in measures that require them to start freeing prisoners when they reach a certain level of overcrowding. Since prisons have to be ordered to be constructed so far in advance, it makes the individual Departments of Corrections have to do forecasting and this cost-benefit analysis of whether or not they can release prisoners/continue overcrowding/change policies/build new prisons. Prisons are crazy expensive to build and staff, but small towns lobby heavily for their construction and right now the new craze is actually prison privatization where companies like Wackenhut or some of the other large security corporations take over existing prisons or build private prisons.
If you have any specific or directed questions about crime, imprisonment or other related issues I can answer those.
AmericanNazbro posted:Hmm great analysis really made me think
thanks D&D is full of insights
Marx's criticism of the Paris Commune wasn't "they didn't seize the banks stupid n00bs LOL"
babyhueypnewton posted:Well from what I heard London Occupy was terrible, much worse than New York. Most of the criticisms here of OWS are shallow and are the same criticisms everyone made before the movement even begun. Obviously OWS was lliberal and was limited by its ideology and tactics, but it also had many successes and provided a lot for the left to discuss in terms of tactics and propaganda.
Marx's criticism of the Paris Commune wasn't "they didn't seize the banks stupid n00bs LOL"
bhpn is right
Yes the message of Occupy was incoherent and the 99% crap, besides being an ideological mess, practically prevented OWs from expelling undercover cops, crazy homeless people, Ron Paul libertarians, racists, etc.
Yes the "camp" aspect was a huge money sink and frustrated the hell out of the poor guys who had to do security or feed the whole New York homeless community without police protection. It led to segregation and discrimination within the confines of a small park, and yeah the racial politics were crap.
We all know this, and we've all known this about anarchist politics for a long time. It doesn't explain why OWS became the largest left wing movement since the 70s. It doesn't explain why the language of OWS became adopted by the media, the main political parties, the populace at large, and even other left groups. It doesn't explain why the PSL, which has a coherent marxist economic analysis, a diverse membership, and a principled, anti-imperialist political analysis(and successful anti-war movement) had a massive banner with 'We are the 99%" in the central NY office and was in Zuccoti and then Union Square trying to recruit people. It doesn't explain why Occupy mobilized a whole section of the population which normally doesn't participate in any political process, and why Occupy expanded so far beyond the typical anarchist lifestyle squatters.
All of the criticisms you make are important to check the utopian anarchists like David Graeber who think those kind of politics are more advanced and more 'democratic' than Marxism rather than the same tired crap Marx himself had to write polemics against. But they don't really explain what made OWS different, and what we can learn from it.
PSL
lol the revolution will occur through electoral means and voting advances the cause of communism lol
discipline posted:babyhueypnewton posted:It doesn't explain why Occupy mobilized a whole section of the population which normally doesn't participate in any political process, and why Occupy expanded so far beyond the typical anarchist lifestyle squatters.
I don't know BHPN it sort of appealed to this generation of hyper-individualized thrill seekers. low commitment. feeling important. on the cusp of history. brag to ur friends. get on tv. smoke a doob.
Well if that's what makes up this generation than we need to appeal to them. You've given OWS this 'original sin', which is partially being too white/male, being too liberal, and being too reflective of all the problems of our society at large. OK great, I'm not defending OWS, it's done and I'm a Marxist. What can we learn? What were its successes? Self-righteousness will get us nowhere, especially rooted in a kind of misanthropy which complains about how the masses should be instead of how they are.