apparently some Avakianite (Raymond Lotta) annoyed Zizek enough that they're gonna have a debate next year. It's sure to be hilarious. Feel free to discuss the new synthesis and Lacanian-Marxist interpretations of the matrix and other pop culture itt.
http://www.countercurrents.org/lotta220112.htm
there's nothing of interest in this, the only thing worth taking from it is Lotta is really mad and hearing someone ask Zizek why he is a bourgeois apologist for imperialism and anti-communist propaganda is gonna be funny.
babyhueypnewton posted:yes feel free to make goodfellas jokes too
"Ever since I can remember I always wanted to be a bankster"
well, "economist", since he's a maoist, and therefore not a real economist
statickinetics posted:yeah itll own watching two symbols of the modern left's impotence battle it out to see who's actually more irrelevant
exactly, but they're impotent for the opposite reasons. it'll be like watching a bunch of hippies protesting an Adorno lecture for the 21st century.
statickinetics posted:yeah itll own watching two symbols of the modern left's impotence battle it out to see who's actually more irrelevant
jools posted:zizek and all his fans are racists
lol why
jools posted:zizek and all his fans are racists
yea thats whats ''in'' now, loser
Keven posted:I'd like to see zizek debate SCSA (Stone Cold Steve Austin) in the squared circle and watch that mewling fat turd pee his lacanite pants but that's just kev's opinion. Hell, we've all got one.
Crow posted:
Who's excited for EGS Trot vs. CPUSA Trot next year?
literally no one, other than to see how long it takes for them to start sucking dixxx
When: Monday, April 15, 2013, 6-9 pm
Where: Columbia University, New York City—Altschul Auditorium, International Affairs Building, Rm 417 (enter at Amsterdam & 117th, below the overpass)
The core questions up for debate:
Was the first stage of communist revolution, the Russian and Chinese revolutions, overwhelmingly positive, with real shortcomings—or was it at best a mixed record, or even a failure and disaster?
Does Bob Avakian's new synthesis provide the framework for forging a vibrant socialist society in transition to communism—or not?
Is it presumptuous and preposterous at this stage to pose definitive answers and alternatives to the horrors of the world—or is this in fact what is needed, demanded, and possible at this hour?
Is the RCP strategy for revolution, ultimately aiming for the seizure of state power, what is needed today—or is this outmoded or impractical, requiring a different approach for social change?
http://revcom.us/a/299/the-slavoj-zizek-raymond-lotta-debate-en.html
i sort of want to go.