the narrative of colonization is always the same. manifest destiny, 'the empty land', 'savages who can't even make proper use of the land' etc etc.
the difference between the colonization of America and that of Palestine is more akin to the difference between the 1948 and 1967 borders. Ask David Ben-Gurion about that...
Goethestein posted:shennong posted:cool yeah, a drawing, convincing
are you under the impression that archaeological data isnt evidence or are you just a complete dunce
Transient_Grace posted:Jared Diamond never says disease wiped out 90% of the native american population, the freaking book is called "Guns, Germs and Steel" and opens with an account of Francisco Pizarro's massacre of Cajarmaca.
Jared Diamond also have a glorious combover.
"Throughout the Americas, diseases introduced with Europeans spread from tribe to tribe far in advance of the Europeans themselves, killing an estimated 95 percent of the pre-Columbian Native American population."
-- j-dawg, in guns, germs, and steel
screw you buddy.
shennong posted:Goethestein posted:shennong posted:cool yeah, a drawing, convincing
are you under the impression that archaeological data isnt evidence or are you just a complete dunce
remember it's all bullshit platitudes designed to fit into the leftist narratives. goatstein's been to the anasazi cliff dwellings and is adamant he would never live there. they don't even have cable
shennong posted:Goethestein posted:shennong posted:cool yeah, a drawing, convincing
are you under the impression that archaeological data isnt evidence or are you just a complete dunce
you know what would be a good bit of archaeological evidence? millions of pretend corpses
littlegreenpills posted:shennong posted:Goethestein posted:shennong posted:cool yeah, a drawing, convincing
are you under the impression that archaeological data isnt evidence or are you just a complete dunce
remember it's all bullshit platitudes designed to fit into the leftist narratives. goatstein's been to the anasazi cliff dwellings and is adamant he would never live there. they don't even have cable
have you been to an anasazi cliff dwilling? i have. they are cool and impressive and all, but not exactly anything you could imagine to be a bustling metropolis of thousands of people
this is the biggest cliff dwelling in north america. it is smaller than a supermarket.
Goethestein posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mesaverde_cliffpalace_20030914.752.jpgthis is the biggest cliff dwelling in north america. it is smaller than a supermarket.
that's pretty impressive honestly so i'm not sure that proves your point
Lessons posted:you think the indians were advanced enough to support large populations? well here's a town they carved out of solid rock and was so resilient it's still standing to this day. your move, creep.
that wasnt carved out of the rock. and i didnt say they werent advanced enough, i said that theres no evidence that such large populations ever actually existed
littlegreenpills posted:y'know goat, there's no skeletal evidence that the fertile crescent or the nile delta or medieval europe were in the millions. corpses rot, bones crumble - if you bury a body without a coffin then barring extraordinary conditions it will have disappeared within a century. there's a reason we don't base population estimates on a direct headcount of how many skeletons we can dig up. yawn. next point please
how about the fact that we have no evidence whatsoever that that number of people existed in any way, oral histories, large settlements, settler records, garbage volume, known hunter gatherer population densities, or the fact that most of the corpse piles in north america would have been only a century or two removed from modern scholarship
Myfanwy posted:This is my basic outline of white traits
Beautiful
Noble
Courageous
Kind
Wise
Tall
Anyone who doesn't fit those is probably just a swamp hominid artefact population remnant
You are shit. This is in no way funny so cut it the fuck out.
Goethestein posted:littlegreenpills posted:y'know goat, there's no skeletal evidence that the fertile crescent or the nile delta or medieval europe were in the millions. corpses rot, bones crumble - if you bury a body without a coffin then barring extraordinary conditions it will have disappeared within a century. there's a reason we don't base population estimates on a direct headcount of how many skeletons we can dig up. yawn. next point please
how about the fact that we have no evidence whatsoever that that number of people existed in any way, oral histories, large settlements, settler records, garbage volume, known hunter gatherer population densities, or the fact that most of the corpse piles in north america would have been only a century or two removed from modern scholarship
hmm yes compel- *is crushed by collapse of bookshelf filled with volumes of midcontinental journal of archaeology*
tpaine posted:WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON IN THIS THREAD
resident zionists goatstein and iwc divert the thread away from discussiofn of anti african racism in the zionist entity.
tpaine posted:TOM HELP ME
what is it now clarence you faggot
babyfinland posted:is1491 good
its really bad
tpaine posted:babyfinland posted:tpaine posted:TOM HELP ME
what is it now clarence you faggot
i...i...
out with it man damn yuo
tpaine posted:get your friends to get you more wine and samwiches
Goethestein posted:about 5-7 million people lived in north america, a significant fraction of them in mexico. many more in south america obviously
ubelakers commonly accepted estimate is about 2 million actually with about 75% of those dying from violence and disease after contact iirc