So mocking the believers is equivalent to mocking Allaah, His verses and His Messenger. And Allaah is the Source of strength.
(Al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, in al-Fataawa al-Jaami’ah li’l-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, part 3, p. 813)
bong_san_suu_kyi posted:does it count as mocking Allah if i effusively praise the adherents of other religions?
no, the prophet used to do this
Goethestein posted:im still interested in the metric used to determine why mohammed is a prophet and joseph smith and l ron hubbard are not
you're missing a few (pbuh)s there buddy
Goethestein posted:im still interested in the metric used to determine why mohammed is a prophet and joseph smith and l ron hubbard are not
there are a million youtube lectures on this. i suggest you watch one featuring kamal al mekki, perhaps one of the several episodes of the deen show where he presents his arguments
Impper posted:because mohammad was a prophet without a profit
a bunch of young wives and the spoils of conquest can still be considered "profit" even if it predates capitalism.
I am struggling to find the difference in motivations between Mo' and L ron
Goethestein posted:while im sure theyre the hilarious rambling of a dude who pretends to be an intellectual while believing in the impossible magic of iron age hillbillies, i must decline
but you just claimed you were interested in this very issue!
bong_san_suu_kyi posted:Impper posted:because mohammad was a prophet without a profit
a bunch of young wives and the spoils of conquest can still be considered "profit" even if it predates capitalism.
I am struggling to find the difference in motivations between Mo' and L ron
he lived a very ascetic lifestyle and all of his later marriages were of political import, they weren't young nubile sexchickens
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:I can honestly say that the worst part about people posting against islam is the fact that like 90% of their retarded critiques only exist because they don't know the first thing about islam besides half reading what is posted on LF about it.
If you think ignorance is a barrier to offering an opinion or viewpoint, then you’re delegitimizing the views of pretty much all of the world’s poor masses.
Pretty fucking classist dude.
mistersix posted:Goethestein posted:while im sure theyre the hilarious rambling of a dude who pretends to be an intellectual while believing in the impossible magic of iron age hillbillies, i must decline
but you just claimed you were interested in this very issue!
:pwn:
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:I can honestly say that the worst part about people posting against islam is the fact that like 90% of their retarded critiques only exist because they don't know the first thing about islam besides half reading what is posted on LF about it.
i know its false so all other critiques must derive from that first principle
babyfinland posted:bong_san_suu_kyi posted:
Impper posted:
because mohammad was a prophet without a profit
a bunch of young wives and the spoils of conquest can still be considered "profit" even if it predates capitalism.
I am struggling to find the difference in motivations between Mo' and L ron
he lived a very ascetic lifestyle and all of his later marriages were of political import, they weren't young nubile sexchickens
If the marriages were of political import then surely they involved accumulating or consolidating power, just like Hubbard did with his publishing deals etc.
bong_san_suu_kyi posted:babyfinland posted:bong_san_suu_kyi posted:
Impper posted:
because mohammad was a prophet without a profit
a bunch of young wives and the spoils of conquest can still be considered "profit" even if it predates capitalism.
I am struggling to find the difference in motivations between Mo' and L ron
he lived a very ascetic lifestyle and all of his later marriages were of political import, they weren't young nubile sexchickensIf the marriages were of political import then surely they involved accumulating or consolidating power, just like Hubbard did with his publishing deals etc.
they had social significance but he still loved them, its quite clear
babyfinland posted:bong_san_suu_kyi posted:babyfinland posted:bong_san_suu_kyi posted:
Impper posted:
because mohammad was a prophet without a profit
a bunch of young wives and the spoils of conquest can still be considered "profit" even if it predates capitalism.
I am struggling to find the difference in motivations between Mo' and L ron
he lived a very ascetic lifestyle and all of his later marriages were of political import, they weren't young nubile sexchickensIf the marriages were of political import then surely they involved accumulating or consolidating power, just like Hubbard did with his publishing deals etc.
they had social significance but he still loved them, its quite clear
l ron hubbard was a world savvy adventurer and miracle worker, it says so right here in his autobiography
animedad posted:i uphold my family and my block I'm ignant as fuck. fuck islam or w/e i dont care I'm an american, strive for your overseas otherness or w/e
oh so muslims arent american huh
babyfinland posted:animedad posted:i uphold my family and my block I'm ignant as fuck. fuck islam or w/e i dont care I'm an american, strive for your overseas otherness or w/e
oh so muslims arent american huh
pleas watch this video for some convincing arguments why this is so. don't be a baby and wuss out
crustpunk_trotsky posted:babyfinland posted:animedad posted:i uphold my family and my block I'm ignant as fuck. fuck islam or w/e i dont care I'm an american, strive for your overseas otherness or w/e
oh so muslims arent american huh
pleas watch this video for some convincing arguments why this is so. don't be a baby and wuss out
blow me
babyfinland posted:i mean is the argument here that because someone else claimed to be a prophet muhammad is probably also a false prophet? lol
As a layperson presented with a myriad of people pupporting to be prophets and holding up some writing as proof, it's hard to divine the legitimacy of one from the other tbqh
bong_san_suu_kyi posted:babyfinland posted:i mean is the argument here that because someone else claimed to be a prophet muhammad is probably also a false prophet? lol
As a layperson presented with a myriad of people pupporting to be prophets and holding up some writing as proof, it's hard to divine the legitimacy of one from the other tbqh
maybe you should see a doctor about your broken soul
babyfinland posted:i mean is the argument here that because someone else claimed to be a prophet muhammad is probably also a false prophet? lol
pretty much, there's at least a dozen people who founded major religions claiming to be prophets with almost exactly the same evidence as mohammed. theres no particular good reason to be a muslim instead of a seventh-day adventist or a raelian