edit:
I guess to be fair to Horselord I should probably post what was originally here:
'Yeah, you've gotten pretty lumpen as of late
goondolences'
I'm not sure whether to call it bad faith or intellectual dishonesty, but you keep harping on this 'criticism of bad pamphlet praxis' thing even after your concerns have been addressed.
I'm sorry you are going through a tough time with your housing situation. But can you please show some humility and back off a bit from this silly fight you've picked with posters trying to make pamphlets?
pogfan1996 posted:The dude just put together some nice pamphlets and you are being a weirdo about it and arguing against imaginary positions
i literally quoted tears weird thirdworldist use of "labour aristocrat" as an excuse to not try
Belphegor posted:Nobody is saying any of the stuff you keep claiming they are saying. A lot of people here do try to organize people, which is a feat i'm pretty sure you are mentally and emotionally incapable of.
Don't be rude
Horselord posted:don't sign me up for shit i'm literally losing my home in the next week or two
the sincere concern about this post is heartwarming but stop PMing me i'm fine and using the eviction as an excuse to go cycle touring. it was just a blunt reason why i'm not free to do a thing
normies or clueless communists like myself?
if it's the former i think it should start simply by saying stuff like:
hey! have you noticed things have been getting really bad under both parties?
- you hear about black people getting killed a lot near police
- your hispanic friends are being shoved in vans and taken away
- your pay and benefits are inadequate and you feel like a tool in the workplace
- you think people should be equal and have control over their productions
- you fantasize about politicians being put up against a wall
congratulations you may be a communist!
marlax78 posted:let's argue for a 15 dollar minimum wage... globally.
tears posted:if i'd known that spending somespare time scanning a legacy pamphlet about the korean war for a few friends and then posting it on a niche irony forum was going to cause a total meltdown.... id have done it sooner
your the one who took generalized criticism of how pamphlets are misused for outreach as an attack on your own personal efforts,
Horselord posted:tears posted:If after considering the history of the british working class since owenism, combine with the knowledge that millions of often very poorly educated workers and peasants have taken up arms across the world with a better grasp of marxist theory and practice than us, you think the lack of revolution in britain is because the pamphlets use too many big words and dont talk to peoples real interests: a greater share of the profits of imperialism; then i dont know what to say, maybe read some more pamphlets?
tears, a third worldist, smells bad: people in our country are all labour aristocrats, which is the same as being bourgeois, so we should never talk to them and just focus on ourselves and those who become communist on their own. socialism will never happen here and this is all pointless
me, handsome, lives in a flophouse: its bad to intentionally isolate yourself from the masses because you can't actually achieve anything that way ever. its important to spread our ideas as widely as possible from first principles because they're almost completely unknown here; and to gain prestige, goodwill and credibility by serving the people because "labour aristocrat" is a useless way to describe the many people who are seeing their economic status continually degrade at best and are literally dying of poverty en masse at worst. then we'll really have something cooking
marxist and marxist-leninist movements have a rich and nuanced history and philosophical foundations that should not be overly elided or condensed in attempting to simplify. we should aim to present true ideas clearly and coherently, and incorporate contemporary imagery, idioms, vernacular, etc. -- but I believe there is a real risk of the medium becoming (or obscuring) the content. above all, right now I think we need to clearly differentiate authentic marxist analysis from the false promise of well-intentioned progressive liberalism, and that requires drawing lines and distinctions that will unavoidably be perceived as sectarian and exclusionary. we need to think dialectically about where that line is best drawn.
e.g. i found this one:
e: and this 1
Edited by tears ()
new marketing technique, sample page:
download pamphlet: http://docdro.id/Aw2arkK
download reading version: http://docdro.id/IWZKqLQ
reasons to read this pamphlet:
it has a bit like settlers except about europe
rude about the AFL-CIO
unlike most stuff not just a big neg, includes section: what you can do
will make me happy
but it's got a nice snappy cover design, a good layout and typeface, and is written in easy-to-understand tone that doesn't rely on a lot of prior knowledge of theory. it's the perfect sort of thing to hand out at a demo or other event to sympathetic bystanders. dense theory doesn't really work for pamplets imo
roseweird posted:the guy on the right is using his hands to demonstrate how big solidarity is
they were swinging on a vine too long and their elbows got stuck like that
gyrofry posted:everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. historical and dialectical materialism have an inherent appeal to those who are exploited due to being useful tools for understanding and changing the world. I believe this is the only reason why they've managed, against all odds and all the concerted might of repression and propaganda to survive and in fact are more relevant than ever.
marxist and marxist-leninist movements have a rich and nuanced history and philosophical foundations that should not be overly elided or condensed in attempting to simplify. we should aim to present true ideas clearly and coherently, and incorporate contemporary imagery, idioms, vernacular, etc. -- but I believe there is a real risk of the medium becoming (or obscuring) the content. above all, right now I think we need to clearly differentiate authentic marxist analysis from the false promise of well-intentioned progressive liberalism, and that requires drawing lines and distinctions that will unavoidably be perceived as sectarian and exclusionary. we need to think dialectically about where that line is best drawn.
that being said i should really add some more ways to get things on the front page here and give it a lil refresh