tpaine posted:oh sorry piss! if only he'd used something you'd be more familiar with, like a grimes song or the latest taylor swift ditty!
to tune of blank space: anarchy dad anarchy, dad anarchy anarchy dad, anarchy dad anarchy, anarchy ana narchy dad, anarchy dad anarchy dad, anarchy dad dad dad, anarchy dad anarchy dad dad, ANARCHY DAD
ilmdge posted:If you mostly just follow the idiot fuckers from here, and are looking for something a little more refined and sophisticated, might I suggest @McCaineNL?
mccaine should be writing technical manuals for toaster ovens, not revolutionary philosophy
RedMaistre posted:A Self-identified "zombie killer" (i.e. enemy of the people) thinks Twitter=French revolution (or rather the Charles Dickens/Edmund Burke caricature of the same), and that biggest problem facing the web today is not government surveillance or corporate monopolization but "abuse."
https://medium.com/bad-words/why-twitter-s-dying-and-what-you-can-learn-from-it-9ed233e37974
same
"Something is wrong on Twitter. And people are noticing.
Or, at least, the kind of people we hang around with on Twitter are noticing. And it's maybe not a very important demographic, this very weird and specific kind of user: audience-obsessed, curious, newsy. Twitter's earnings last quarter, after all, were an improvement on the period before, and it added 14 million new users for a total of 255 million. The thing is: Its users are less active than they once were. Twitter says these changes reflect a more streamlined experience, but we have a different theory: Twitter is entering its twilight."
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/04/a-eulogy-for-twitter/361339/
Looking back, 2013 Twitter was basically a hangover to 2012 Twitter, when we could imagine leaving the platform some day but not anytime soon. Or maybe we're chasing the ghost of 2011 Twitter. It was a hectic feed then, a staticky mess of affiliate notifications, manual retweets, and Foursquare checkins. Remember 2010 Twitter? The year it seemed everyone had finally caved and signed up. The Arab Spring made people optimistic about the platform as a transformative force. Roger Ebert and Rob Delaney ruled. 2009 Twitter is a blur and the disjointedness of 2008 Twitter is hard to remember at this point. Before that, people weren't even having conversations on the platform. Not really."
tpaine posted:is twitter dead yet so we can finally move on
Nobody: Did you kill the white man who killed you?
William Blake: I'm not dead. Am I?
What particularly interests me about the anime avatar is that it was initially (as I first encountered it, at any rate) a metonym for a weird-internet-politics group about as distant from Gamergate as you can find: a loosely affiliated community of hard-left self-proclaimed Maoists.
Of course anime avatars are now more strongly identified with Gamergate and its various surrounding reactionary communities, a group no less weird (by the standards of mainstream meatspace American politics), but much larger and, frankly, scarier.
But why anime avatars? What do Gamergaters have in common with Twitter Stalinists? As noted above, in some ways anime avatars are the equivalent of a fedora or a leather duster or transition lenses, a quick public signal of someone’s (proud) nerdom. If egg avatars are signs of Twitter, and likely internet, novices, anime avatars would seem to be the opposite: the signs of people who have spent, or are spending, too much time online.
This kind of too-much-time-online nerdiness seems to be correlated in turn — and I’m just speculating here; I have no data — with an outgrowth of new, weird, fascinating kinds of outside-the-mainstream or extreme politics, like effusive 21st-century Titoism. Or like Gamergate.
ilmdge posted:the rhizzone: proudly anime-free since twenty thirteen (smell ya later tug lesions!!!!)
False; we proudly Uphold Animè in our line as per the wise instruction of GF (getfiscal)((The Don)))
ilmdge posted:http://nymag.com/following/2015/11/dreaded-anime-avatar-explained.htmlWhat particularly interests me about the anime avatar is that it was initially (as I first encountered it, at any rate) a metonym for a weird-internet-politics group about as distant from Gamergate as you can find: a loosely affiliated community of hard-left self-proclaimed Maoists.
Of course anime avatars are now more strongly identified with Gamergate and its various surrounding reactionary communities, a group no less weird (by the standards of mainstream meatspace American politics), but much larger and, frankly, scarier.
But why anime avatars? What do Gamergaters have in common with Twitter Stalinists? As noted above, in some ways anime avatars are the equivalent of a fedora or a leather duster or transition lenses, a quick public signal of someone’s (proud) nerdom. If egg avatars are signs of Twitter, and likely internet, novices, anime avatars would seem to be the opposite: the signs of people who have spent, or are spending, too much time online.
This kind of too-much-time-online nerdiness seems to be correlated in turn — and I’m just speculating here; I have no data — with an outgrowth of new, weird, fascinating kinds of outside-the-mainstream or extreme politics, like effusive 21st-century Titoism. Or like Gamergate.
oh wow lmao
discipline posted:twitter blows and is useless and has caused me a lot of stress irl
come home to the zzone
with an outgrowth of new, weird, fascinating kinds of outside-the-mainstream or extreme politics, like effusive 21st-century Titoism. Or like Gamergate.
I showed someone how to type y o u t u b e and next thing he began demonstrating new, weird, fascinating kinds of outside-the-mainstream or extreme politics, like hating anita sarkeesian. no strong opinions about tito though
ilmdge posted:the rhizzone: proudly anime-free since twenty thirteen (smell ya later tug lesions!!!!)
this isn't true, cman has an anime avatar. It's us. it's us it's inside of us
EmanuelaBrolandi posted:Tito was badass imho
"Twitter is over. We can no longer build rhetorical control there."
Edited by animedad ()
EmanuelaBrolandi posted:What im saying is i understand the problem w 'Titoism' but just because he lived longer than Stalin doesn't mean we should attribute all the actions of one of the most 'diverse' Communist party to him just because he was a figurehead. That's exactly what people do to slander Stalin
you have my axe
Yugoslavia was more interesting and vibrant than the USSR as well in terms of cultural products, management of ethny, and domestic economic policy.
Edited by COINTELBRO ()
COINTELBRO posted:Tito was definitely better than most Soviet statesmen (and weirdos like Hoxha, though he valiantly tried to fix a retarded country like Albania.)
Yugoslavia was more interesting and vibrant than the USSR as well in terms of cultural products, management of ethny, and economic policy.
This is why they had unemployment in the double digits and collapsed into war within ten years of him dying
e: no
Edited by Flying_horse_in_saudi_arabia ()