#41
re: 1 and sorta 2 yeah, i am making that assumption, but i dont think theyre opposed to disorder as long as said disorder still enables them to get them whatever they want in said country/region
#42
fuck
#43


#44
was that planned in advance do you think, id have thought the organisations are too monolithic and obsessed with branding to do anything on the spur of the moment.
#45
well it's time for liberalism to finally pay off. would you prefer Disney Dollars or a second host on "Beachfront Bargain Hunt"?
#46
The spectacle presents itself simultaneously as all of society, as part of society, and as instrument of unification. As a part of society it is specifically the sector which concentrates all gazing and all consciousness. Due to the very fact that this sector is separate, it is the common ground of the deceived gaze and of false consciousness, and the unification it achieves is nothing but an official language of generalized separation.
#47

Panopticon posted:

was that planned in advance do you think, id have thought the organisations are too monolithic and obsessed with branding to do anything on the spur of the moment.

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-get-the-facebook-rainbow-filter-2015-6

#48
i don't see anything special about the american left, they are as progressive and humanitarian as they possibly can be without ever risking their class comforts. just like any bourgeoisie. there is a practical limit to how anti-racist you can be when you also require a new smartphone every year or so.
#49
Our species must dissolve to rivers of grotesquely entwined flesh, consuming and excreting itself and its fluids in a foul unified orgy of rending and fucking, spouts of sweat and cum rising from incestuous, inbred eddies, blood and hair washing up on shores of teeth and high heels, the squeals of a meatfall, raw, unlubed parts orgasming to bits on the boulders, baby mouths and grandma butts alike flowing to a sea of glorious lust and terror, and I celebrate this SCOTUS decision as a very small step in that general direction.
#50
#51

Urbandale posted:

its probably more accurate to say that the us military has been fairly effective but us imperialism is so weak that it cant leverage that particular tool with full efficacy. hence color revs, the failure in yugoslavia and somalia, the imperialist schism over iraq 2 and the inability to create an effective puppet state there, etc



do you mean the color revolutions that were planned, orchestrated, and materially supported by the CIA, or some other color revolutions i dont know about?

#52

dipshit420 posted:

a coworker of mine just said that his friend has to hire immigrants because americans won't do any labor. he said no americans will accept 2 dollars an hour when they can make 7 an hour at mcdonalds doing nothing.

my head hurts, rhizzone.



tell him they WILL accept $2 he just has to put out a tip jar first

#53

swampman posted:

i don't see anything special about the american left, they are as progressive and humanitarian as they possibly can be without ever risking their class comforts. just like any bourgeoisie. there is a practical limit to how anti-racist you can be when you also require a new smartphone every year or so.



it's probably a lot easier to feel millennial hope over bourgeois democracy when your country doesn't already have it. it doesn't make you right but i imagine it takes less energy.

#54
although the truth is, i talk about the united states a lot because i happen to know a lot about that country relative to other countries, which seems strange but life is full of funny coincidences. i mean, if i tried to give a parallel example about canada i'd start talking about the Beaver Party and the Leaf Party and link to some kate beaton cartoons out of panic
#55

Superabound posted:

Urbandale posted:

its probably more accurate to say that the us military has been fairly effective but us imperialism is so weak that it cant leverage that particular tool with full efficacy. hence color revs, the failure in yugoslavia and somalia, the imperialist schism over iraq 2 and the inability to create an effective puppet state there, etc

do you mean the color revolutions that were planned, orchestrated, and materially supported by the CIA, or some other color revolutions i dont know about?



i am not saying that the CIA isnt an integral aspect of the ability of the US to project its power. but what i am saying is that there is a reason its using the very inexpensive (in manpower, due to presunk costs into NGOs in the country and domestic NGOs funding them, like the AFL-CIO's international committee) methods they are using and not the military option. the strongarm military doesnt work and hasnt for decades.

#56

Urbandale posted:

its probably more accurate to say that the us military has been fairly effective but us imperialism is so weak that it cant leverage that particular tool with full efficacy. hence color revs, the failure in yugoslavia and somalia, the imperialist schism over iraq 2 and the inability to create an effective puppet state there, etc



the west succeeded in yugoslavia fyi

#57
what is the left position on the breakup of yugoslavia
#58
the left position on the breakup of yugoslavia is to declare it the test ground for a brutal new Pax Americana because you're a quadraplegic psychiatrist who can't feel his dick and only clings to sanity through extreme sadistic fantasies of total control. oh wait i'm sorry, that's the mainstream moderate position on yugoslavia my bad
#59

Urbandale posted:

Superabound posted:

Urbandale posted:

its probably more accurate to say that the us military has been fairly effective but us imperialism is so weak that it cant leverage that particular tool with full efficacy. hence color revs, the failure in yugoslavia and somalia, the imperialist schism over iraq 2 and the inability to create an effective puppet state there, etc

do you mean the color revolutions that were planned, orchestrated, and materially supported by the CIA, or some other color revolutions i dont know about?



i am not saying that the CIA isnt an integral aspect of the ability of the US to project its power. but what i am saying is that there is a reason its using the very inexpensive (in manpower, due to presunk costs into NGOs in the country and domestic NGOs funding them, like the AFL-CIO's international committee) methods they are using and not the military option. the strongarm military doesnt work and hasnt for decades.


the strongarm military does work tho, as an occupying force once the proper environment has been prepared by intelligence operations. like all the talk about regional instability, soldier deaths etc that are mentioned in the news as benchmarks for military failure, but well, they aren't failures. those are military successes.

the US is succeeding at its goals. it has succeeded in Ukraine (need I remind that there is currently an occupation of heavy US ordinance), it has succeeded in iraq, in libya, and we'll probably see it succeed in syria in the next few years. if we reach back, it has succeeded in japan, in korea, even to a certain extent in cuba. we mistake chaos, death, suffering, and terror for failure because it is sold to us as such, as the tragic misadventures of a well meaning force failing to do good, but the imperial regime is more or less accomplishing all its goals and the military is helping to facilitate this all the way. working as intended.

#60
my greatest DYTD moment: using the unreal tournament warrior twitter account to @krauthammer "I CAN'T FEEL MY LEGS. I'M ON YOUR TEAM IDIOT"
#61
why did you have to reveal that you are unrealtournamentwarrior. why must you destroy all the beauty and mystery of the world.
#62
i'm not unreal tournament warrior, that's a group account and most of the stuff posted by it has no known individual author
#63
did anyone here really believe that one of the most retarded pseudo style posters here created the account with the highest post to upvote ratio?? i'm flattered, and retarded
#64
so........ ladies.... gentlemen... don't you often think to yourselves "whoa, wow, i miss OpenID login"
#65

cars posted:

so........ ladies.... gentlemen... don't you often think to yourselves "whoa, wow, i miss OpenID login"


All The Time

#66

babyhueypnewton posted:

getfiscal posted:
babyhueypnewton posted:
the US military hasnt won shit in 40+ years. but when you have chinese people watching Modern Family and lamenting the lack of gay rights in China, that's imperial power.
i'm glad you've become an idealist and believe that the battle for ideas is primary, which is your position now, as an idealist.


In Terrorist Assemblages I propose a rapproachment of Foucauldian biopolitics and Achille Mbembe’s critique of it through what I call a ‘bio-necro collaboration’, one that conceptually acknowledges biopower’s direct activity to death, while remaining bound to the optimalization of life, and necropolitics’ nonchalance towards death even as it seeks out killing as a primary aim. I allege that it is precisely within the interstices of life and death that we find the differences between queer subjects who are being folded (back) into life and the racialized queernesses that emerge through the naming of populations, thus fueling the oscillation between the disciplining of subjects and control of populations. The result of the successes of queer incorporation into the domains of consumer markets and social recognition in the post-civil rights, late twentieth-century era, these various entries by queers into the biopolitics optimalization of life mark a shift, as homosexual bodies have been historically understood as endlessly cathected to death, from being figures of death (i.e., the AIDS pandemic) to becoming tied to ideas of life and productivity (i.e., gay marriage and reproductive kinship).

The fundamental feature of necrocapitalism is accumulation by dispossession and the creation of death worlds in colonial contexts . The historical context of contemporary practices of accumulation by dispossession, violence and death is situated in the early years of European colonialism. The ideology of the new empire reflected the needs of colonial modernities where older justifications of empire through civilization were reconfigured by economic conceptions of progress and development resulting in a form of capitalist imperialism



anybody read thisp osT? this guy saying gay people are zombies or skeletors or what

#67
#68

stegosaurus posted:

what is the left position on the breakup of yugoslavia

http://www.michaelparenti.org/yugoslavia.html

#69
i think the US prefers Pinochet-style dictators but knows that it's generally unrealistic these days so it settles for destabilizing and destroying relatively independent regimes. sort of like how in Vietnam it ravaged the environment and bled the country so much through sanctions it made socialist development impossible and sweatshop-based rapprochement inevitable.

as far as methods go, the US military and the soft power NGOs funded by USAID/NED are two sides of the same coin and rely on each other equally. if it weren't for US military air strikes and covert arms trafficking Yugoslavia and Libya might still be intact. likewise in Haiti, the subversive use of "civil society" NGOs to coordinate the anti-Aristide opposition would have failed if not for paramilitary rebels armed & trained by US Special Forces and the Dominican Republic's military.
#70

HenryKrinkle posted:

i think the US prefers Pinochet-style dictators but knows that it's generally unrealistic these days so it settles for destabilizing and destroying relatively independent regimes. sort of like how in Vietnam it ravaged the environment and bled the country so much through sanctions it made socialist development impossible and sweatshop-based rapprochement inevitable.

as far as methods go, the US military and the soft power NGOs funded by USAID/NED are two sides of the same coin and rely on each other equally. if it weren't for US military air strikes and covert arms trafficking Yugoslavia and Libya might still be intact. likewise in Haiti, the subversive use of "civil society" NGOs to coordinate the anti-Aristide opposition would have failed if not for paramilitary rebels armed & trained by US Special Forces and the Dominican Republic's military.


Yes, obviously, but how does this tie back to two men kissing

#71
ask BHPN
#72

swirlsofhistory posted:

HenryKrinkle posted:

i think the US prefers Pinochet-style dictators but knows that it's generally unrealistic these days so it settles for destabilizing and destroying relatively independent regimes. sort of like how in Vietnam it ravaged the environment and bled the country so much through sanctions it made socialist development impossible and sweatshop-based rapprochement inevitable.

as far as methods go, the US military and the soft power NGOs funded by USAID/NED are two sides of the same coin and rely on each other equally. if it weren't for US military air strikes and covert arms trafficking Yugoslavia and Libya might still be intact. likewise in Haiti, the subversive use of "civil society" NGOs to coordinate the anti-Aristide opposition would have failed if not for paramilitary rebels armed & trained by US Special Forces and the Dominican Republic's military.

Yes, obviously, but how does this tie back to two men kissing



yeah fuck critical thinking. two dudes making out ftw. This thread must be full of those ReTHUGlicans who are secretly gay.

#73
its really not that complicated. sexuality is a concept born of capitalist modernity along with race, nation, etc. the question is then why does this discourse exist? what purpose does it serve under capitalism and how did it come to be formed? does it have the potential to subvert capitalism or does it reconstitute it? how does it interact with imperialism, semi-feudal underdeveloped nations, and of course actually existing socialism?

these are not moral questions or questions of principle, they are either historical questions or tactical questions that have to be constantly reevaluated.

the main expansion of queer theory is to expand the concept of sexuality to all forms of capitalist biopolitics and not simply what is narrowly thought of as sex. this should be obvious after Freud but seems to have not penetrated the left. if we think of sexuality as a matter of inclusion and exclusion of populations, whether in economic terms (as reserve army of labor, proletarians and bourgeoisie, labor aristocracy, etc) or queer theory terms (as populations allowed to live under the state of exception or excluded from even being human/legible to power), then instead of thinking of gay rights as a progressive struggle, we instead see how it has been used to "queer" (turn into sexual deviants) Muslims and other targets of imperial machinations since the end of the cold war.

gay rights is not being won despite lack of progress in other areas or as an exception to Obama's global murder campaign but is in fact integral to it be reconstituting who is sexually normative and who is "perverse", largely for the purposes of propanagda against the Muslim world, Russia, and China.
#74

getfiscal posted:







hmm

#75
Toronto:

Pussy Riot [actually just the two that were kicked out, Maria Alyokhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova] will serve as the event’s international grand marshals, leading the Pride parade and taking the stage for a performance at Yonge-Dundas Square on Sunday, June 28.

#76
#77
homofascism, at last!
#78

NoFreeWill posted:

homofascism, at last!



#79

babyhueypnewton posted:

instead of thinking of gay rights as a progressive struggle, we instead see how it has been used to "queer" (turn into sexual deviants) Muslims and other targets of imperial machinations since the end of the cold war.



#80
imo if you take an either/or approach on the topic you ignore surplus repression and your analysis appears Basic to people willing to consider contradictions. it also evidences a lack of understanding of the concept of a gay man in bourgeois consciousness in the Western world for much of the 20th century, which associated "gay" with at best working class despair and at worst indigent planned suicide and reacted appropriately in the material world. bourgeois men who sought sex with other men were portrayed and treated the same way as drug addicts, as people who had the world at their feet but abandoned it for seedy association with addled workers and lumpenproles. the use of the revised narrative of the gay entrepreneur, the gay politician, the gay petty-bourgeois, etc. to attack and slander cultures on the periphery and support violent intervention doesn't demand a scorched-earth response nor a lack of human compassion. and i don't have to tell you that those approaches are strategic suicide, at least for the time being.