HenryKrinkle posted:wasn't "kill your father" some sort of old LF meme relating to Ron Paul?
*drumbeat*
![](http://i.imgur.com/XIgUd.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/hqORU.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/NcAMo.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/ztJRy.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/KAW84.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/eumc6.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/ncsoU.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/IaG6L.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/bRCKE.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/u7Erg.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/XIgUd.gif)
self suck ftw
conec posted:ilmdge that post made me tear up a bit mon.. i`m missing my broe.. i`m gonna post some vids that he liked
he created this video
rest in peace broe u were my true homie .. missin u
-conec
he was too good for this world
Although it’s often lumped in with many of California’s first-wave punk bands, X always side-stepped many of the genre’s early tropes, focusing less on the reactive, “question authority” ethos and instead serving as an updated take on rock ‘n’ roll classics. Yet, it appears that all that exposure to punk’s radicalism seeped into X’s vocalist Exene Cervenka, who has recently been firing off tweet-after-tweet claiming that the recent shooting in Santa Barbara was all an elaborate hoax that would force stricter gun control laws on the public. Cervenka’s firsthand commentary has been slight, as she’s largely reposted Youtube videos from other conspiracy theorists who attempt to prove that Rodgers was an actor likely hired by the government to push its agenda. Scrolling further back into Cervenka’s Twitter feed shows that her stance as a conspiracy theorist and truther has been bubbling for a while, the pinnacle of which was reached when she re-posted a video titled “Illuminati Finger Puppets,” which exposes the truth of government cover-ups in the way it so often does, through close-up photos of Bill Clinton and Miley Cyrus.
![](https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-0/10330393_10203005109901569_1863320029542463677_n.jpg)
paul wall 4 pope
![](http://i.imgur.com/WhpuhLp.png)
i mean, yeah. black and brown kids in the hood get killed by each other and the cops even more than they commit suicide
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-27640474
deadken posted:elliot rodger was a loser and a virgin but not me, i've read derrida
good quote from marx at the end there
Edited by Lessons ()
Lessons posted:Historical materialism means that historical change is driven by conflict between the forces of production and the relations of production, not something idiotic and clearly false like "every event is caused by History and the actors involved are just its conduit", and for that matter it's not supposed to apply to individual persons anyway.
"Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. D'oh! I like straggling my son Bart. What are you waiting for? Follow me for a donut."
deadken posted:"Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. D'oh! I like straggling my son Bart. What are you waiting for? Follow me for a donut."
Your fukkin stupid, "mate", that's actually one of the more voluntaristic statements in Marx and is also just trivially true. I have no idea how you go from "history influences current events" to "Elliot Rodgers was under the thrall of 15th century aristocracy even though he didn't know anything about it and just watched Game of Thrones".
Edited by animedad ()
Lykourgos posted:Yes that article deadken linked to was really shit
tintin abbie haunts you too
Lessons posted:I'm pretty sure Rodger's weird ideas had a lot more to do with his own fucked-up, retarded brain than the specter of 15th century aristocracy.
Nice Nazi race science there. Loser loses posting privileges for about a hitler amount of hours dude. Eris Is Goddess Eris Is Goddess
Lessons posted:Historical materialism means that historical change is driven by conflict between the forces of production and the relations of production, not something idiotic and clearly false like "every event is caused by History and the actors involved are just its conduit", and for that matter it's not supposed to apply to individual persons anyway.
I think, perhaps, maybe, that. Both interpretations, are true. Thanks, for listening.
Edited by eccentricdeathmongrel ()
eccentricdeathmongrel posted:Lessons posted:Historical materialism means that historical change is driven by conflict between the forces of production and the relations of production, not something idiotic and clearly false like "every event is caused by History and the actors involved are just its conduit", and for that matter it's not supposed to apply to individual persons anyway.
I think, perhaps, maybe, that. Both interpretations, are true. Thanks, for listening.
Actually the latter is just vulgar materialism and determinism. Toodles.
Lessons posted:eccentricdeathmongrel posted:
Lessons posted:
Historical materialism means that historical change is driven by conflict between the forces of production and the relations of production, not something idiotic and clearly false like "every event is caused by History and the actors involved are just its conduit", and for that matter it's not supposed to apply to individual persons anyway.
I think, perhaps, maybe, that. Both interpretations, are true. Thanks, for listening.
Actually the latter is just vulgar materialism and determinism. Toodles.
That is my shit
*leers boorishly, raises eyebrow, eyebrow continues to travel impossibly upward, q-quivering like some k-kind of Worm, now sliding above the hairline as my eyes roll back in my skull and i scream a constant stream of radio static*