#1
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/26/21628974-lara-logan-placed-on-leave-over-discredited-60-minutes-report

Lara Logan placed on leave over discredited '60 Minutes' report

CBS’s Lara Logan takes leave of absence after Benghazi report

On Tuesday CBS announced it is imposing a leave of absence on "60 Minutes" correspondent Lara Logan and her producer Max McClellan after their reporting on Benghazi was revealed to be wrong. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

By Tracy Connor, Staff Writer, NBC News

CBS correspondent Lara Logan has been ordered to take a leave of absence after an internal review found her discredited "60 Minutes" segment on the Benghazi consulate attack was poorly vetted, the network said in a memo to staff.
The network also asked Logan's producer, Max McClellan, to take a leave of absence. CBS did not specify a length for the leaves.

"As Executive Producer, I am responsible for what gets on the air," CBS' Jeff Fager said in the memo. "I pride myself in catching almost everything, but this deception got through and it shouldn’t have."

Logan has already publicly apologized for the October story, which featured an interview with security contractor Dylan Davies, who claimed he witnessed the 2012 raid that left four Americans dead.

In the interview and in a book, "The Embassy House," Davies described how he rushed to the U.S. compound and fought his way inside in "an effort to find my American brothers-in-arms and stand with them against the terrorist horde."

Frederick M. Brown / Getty Images file
CBS correspondent Lara Logan is taking a leave of absence in the wake of an internal report that criticized her report on the Benghazi attack.

But an incident report Davies filed with his employer soon after the attack said he couldn't get near the U.S. mission, and that's also what he told the FBI and the State Department.

CBS's review found that "60 Minutes" should have done more digging to expose Davies' conflicting accounts and that when he claimed he lied to his employer about his location that night, it should have raised a red flag.

"The team did not sufficiently vet Davies’ account of his own actions and whereabouts that night," CBS said in the summary of the internal investigation.
The network also concluded that Logan should not have been working on the Benghazi story to start with since she had given a speech in which she criticized the U.S. reaction to the attack.

In addition, "60 Minutes" failed to note that CBS owns Simon & Schuster, which published "The Embassy House." The publisher has stopped selling the book.
Logan, 42, has worked for CBS since 2002. The memo from Fager noted she "has distinguished herself and has put herself in harm’s way many times in the course of covering stories for us."

In 2011, she was sexually attacked and beaten while reporting from Tahrir Square in Cairo about Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's resignation.
#2
[account deactivated]
#3
#4
[account deactivated]
#5
My husband is a fat lazy fucker collecting unemployment from the state of Delaware and he's a fucking ass hole. Sorry.
#6
http://www.rhizzone.net/forum/post/73438/
#7
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/world/africa/29benghazi.html?_r=0

In Libyan Rebel Capital, Shouts of Thanks to America and the West

BENGHAZI, Libya — Frustrated by the gridlocked traffic, the young man in fatigues was leaning on the horn of his old Chevrolet Impala, the one with the front and rear windshields shot out. The shrillness of the pointless noise made a foreigner in the car next to him wince.

Then came one of those Free Libya moments.

“Sorry, sorry,” the horn-blower called apologetically, in English. The young man riding shotgun, also in fatigues and carrying a Kalashnikov, grinned sheepishly and apologized as well. Then he saluted, bringing his wounded right hand into view, a giant mitten of a bandage on it, blood soaking through in places.

“Thank you, thank you,” he said. “America No. 1.”

Americans and, for that matter, all Westerners are treated hereabouts with a warmth and gratitude rarely seen in any Muslim country — even those with 100,000 American troops — in probably half a century or more. People smile and go out of their way to say hello to them, and are almost shockingly courteous. It is that oddest of oddities, an Arab war zone where foreign joggers are regarded, not with hostility or even that sympathetic puzzlement reserved for the insane, but with a friendly wave or a toot on the horn.

Here, even taxi drivers do not rip off foreign visitors, and when a taxi cannot be found, some passing driver will soon volunteer a ride, and will be likely to refuse any offer of payment. A big problem for non-Arabic speaking journalists who visit is trying to find a translator who will accept payment for his or her services. The rebels’ press office has signed up all the English translators it could find, and ordered them to work for free.

In some restaurants, they seem almost reluctant to accept a foreigner’s money. It is a society chronically short of change, so a lot of the coffee bars will just say skip it, and serve up an espresso for whatever loose change is handy, if any. Espresso is one of the welcome surprises of Libya, and while no one would confuse it with Tre Scalini, it is pretty good for a region where the standard stuff is either instant Nescafe or Turkish coffee so thick that a toothpick is needed afterwards.

The pizza, too, is respectable, especially at Pisa Pizza in Benghazi, where the pies are about a yard in diameter. Proof that Italian colonialism accomplished something after all.

In other parts of the Mideast, one refrains from advertising American nationality, if only just in case. This is a part of the world where, other than outside American embassies, the Stars and Stripes are most often spotted ablaze and stomped upon.

Here, crowds of chanting youth fly it proudly, alongside their own new flag, a tricolor with red, black and green horizontal stripes and a crescent and star in the center. (It was widely and quickly adopted by the rebels to replace the Qaddafi government’s hated green flag, an unadorned panel so plain that it has been derided as a putting green.) What popular Arab street movement has ever flown the flags of not only the United States, but the European Union, NATO, Italy, France and Qatar, all at once?

Many Libyan parents with newborn girls are reportedly naming them Susan, in honor of Susan E. Rice, the Obama administration’s ambassador to the United Nations, for her vote in the Security Council in favor of establishing the no-fly zone. French visitors find an even warmer reception, and accolades to President Nicolas Sarkozy are graffitied on walls everywhere.

It may be a long time before any other Muslim press officer tells an American journalist, as Col. Ahmed Bani, the spokesman for the Libyan rebel military, did recently, “You are a mujahedeen and journalism is your jihad!” (The exclamation mark was his.)

So it is easy to let the guard drop, especially since the last time anyone was killed by Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s forces in Benghazi was March 19, when they made their final attempt on the city before NATO fighter-bombers put an end to that.

Now the loyalists are far from the city — the eastern front is 100 miles south of here — and NATO controls the skies. Can they all really be gone, though? While the rebels talk constantly about the danger of a Fifth Column of Qaddafi supporters, it is hard to imagine, so universal is the apparent acclaim for Free Libya.

Still, it may explain why the rebels’ Transitional National Council has so far refused to reveal the identities of most of its members. (This is a big issue for the United States, which has not recognized the rebels, at least in part out of concern over who its leaders really are.)

The Qaddafi government must have had some supporters, even here in the alienated east. In every town and city, there are row after row of new apartment buildings, with units that were in effect given away by the government to families in exchange for only token mortgage payments. While people here deride those blocks as “made in China” for their apparent poor quality of construction, free homes have got to win some enduring support, somewhere.

Perhaps such residual loyalty explains the bullet that whizzed just over one foreign jogger’s head, on the seafront Corniche early on a recent morning, a single shot on an otherwise quiet day. The sound of the rifle’s report came a second later, as it would with a high-velocity round. Whoever fired it was not about to show himself, at least not yet.

#8
If you had questioned her story at the time you would be called a sexist and a rapist. If you question it now you're encouraging rape culture and propagating the "myth" of false rape. If you question any rape story in the future used for imperialist propaganda or CIA operations you need to "check your privilege", the CIA using feminism and to discredit leftists is a conspiracy even though Gloria Steinem (leader of new-left feminism) worked for the CIA, Assange's "victims" worked for the CIA, the CIA funded gender studies in the first place, and rape has been used to justify every American imperialist war since the occupation of the Phillipines.

i'm sorry cycloneman...
#9
holy shit shut up bhpn
#10
We Are All CIA
#11
most feminism is just a reinforcement of the status-quo with the caveat that women be included "into the pie," so to speak (IMHO, of course).
#12

corn posted:

most feminism is just a reinforcement of the status-quo with the caveat that women be included "into the pie," so to speak (IMHO, of course).

that's any ideology that doesn't include consideration for the Third World, including most first world socialism.

in short: stop singling out feminism and LGBT as if they're uniquely first worldist.

#13
nvm
#14
“America No. 1.”
#15
.
#16
Americans and, for that matter, all Westerners are treated hereabouts with a warmth and gratitude rarely seen in any Muslim country — even those with 100,000 American troops —
#17

HenryKrinkle posted:

corn posted:

most feminism is just a reinforcement of the status-quo with the caveat that women be included "into the pie," so to speak (IMHO, of course).

that's any ideology that doesn't include consideration for the Third World, including most first world socialism.

in short: stop singling out feminism and LGBT as if they're uniquely first worldist.

sup henry. some folks have said it seems like you want to combat liberalism only in the general but never in the specific. how do respond to these criticisms? I'll hang up and take my answer off the air.

#18
Excellent racism OP, and sexism as well.
#19
happy t-day alex
#20
I'm eating saltines
#21

Lessons posted:

I'm eating saltines

whoa... you can come to my place for dinner if you want. i'm canadian so i'm not having turkey but i mean.... i can make chicken balls or something like that.

#22
Is that what poutine is? Chicken balls?
#23

HenryKrinkle posted:

in short: stop singling out feminism and LGBT as if they're uniquely first worldist.


obv not all feminism is first worldist but to pretend that its first worldism isnt an actual problem for feminism as it actually exists today doesnt make sense either.

#24

HenryKrinkle posted:

corn posted:

most feminism is just a reinforcement of the status-quo with the caveat that women be included "into the pie," so to speak (IMHO, of course).

that's any ideology that doesn't include consideration for the Third World, including most first world socialism.

in short: stop singling out feminism and LGBT as if they're uniquely first worldist.



Nope, that's not any ideology that doesn't include consideration (what does that even mean) for the Third World, and furthermore he didn't indicate that they're uniquely first wordlist.

#25

getfiscal posted:

Lessons posted:

I'm eating saltines

whoa... you can come to my place for dinner if you want. i'm canadian so i'm not having turkey but i mean.... i can make chicken balls or something like that.

you should try chickencheese

#26

babyhueypnewton posted:

If you had questioned her story at the time you would be called a sexist and a rapist. If you question it now you're encouraging rape culture and propagating the "myth" of false rape. If you question any rape story in the future used for imperialist propaganda or CIA operations you need to "check your privilege", the CIA using feminism and to discredit leftists is a conspiracy even though Gloria Steinem (leader of new-left feminism) worked for the CIA, Assange's "victims" worked for the CIA, the CIA funded gender studies in the first place, and rape has been used to justify every American imperialist war since the occupation of the Phillipines.

i'm sorry cycloneman...



so being a stalinist is pretty much all about believing a bunch of retarded conspiracy theories? sounds about right

#27
"I saw what you did there" says a large muslim man