#1
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/21/us-syria-crisis-idUSBRE97K0EL20130821

Activists say nearly 500 killed in gas attack near Damascus

By Dominic Evans and Khaled Yacoub Oweis
BEIRUT/AMMAN | Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:53am EDT

(Reuters) - Syrian activists accused President Bashar al-Assad's forces of launching a gas attack that killed nearly 500 people on Wednesday, in what would, if confirmed, be by far the worst reported use of chemical arms in the two-year-old civil war.

An opposition monitoring group, citing figures compiled from medical clinics in the Damascus suburbs, put the death toll at 494 - 90 percent of them killed by gas, the rest by bombing and conventional arms.

The rebel Syrian National Coalition said 650 people had been killed. Other rebel groups cited even higher figures.

Images, including some taken by freelance photographers and supplied to Reuters, showed scores of bodies including of small children, laid out on the floor of a clinic with no visible signs of injuries. Reuters was not independently able to verify the cause of their death.

The Syrian armed forces strongly denied using chemical weapons. Syrian state television said the accusations were fabricated to distract a team of U.N. chemical weapons experts which arrived three days ago.

Western countries called urgently for the inspectors to be dispatched to the scene to investigate what would be the deadliest single incident of the Syrian war. If confirmed, it would also be the worst known use of chemical weapons since Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein gassed thousands of Kurds in the town of Halabja in 1988.

Activists said rockets with chemical agents hit the Damascus suburbs of Ain Tarma, Zamalka and Jobar during fierce pre-dawn bombardment by government forces.

The Damascus Media Office monitoring centre said 150 bodies were counted in Hammouriya, 100 in Kfar Batna, 67 in Saqba, 61 in Douma, 76 in Mouadamiya and 40 in Irbib, all suburbs of Damascus.

SYMPTOMS

A nurse at Douma Emergency Collection facility, Bayan Baker, earlier told Reuters the death toll collated from medical centers was at least 213.

"Many of the casualties are women and children. They arrived with their pupils dilated, cold limbs and foam in their mouths. The doctors say these are typical symptoms of nerve gas victims," the nurse said. Exposure to sarin gas causes pupils in the eyes to shrink to pinpoint sizes and foaming at the lips.

The U.N. team is in Syria investigating allegations that both rebels and army forces used chemical weapons in the past, one of the main disputes in international diplomacy over Syria.

The Swedish scientist leading the team, Ake Sellstrom, said the reports should be looked into, but doing so would require a request from a U.N. member state.

France said the mission must be sent to the site to "investigate immediately". Turkey made a similar call. Britain said it was deeply concerned and would raise the issue at the U.N. Security Council, adding the attacks would be "a shocking escalation" if confirmed.

Extensive amateur video and photographs appeared on the Internet. A video purportedly shot in the Kafr Batna neighborhood showed a room filled with more than 90 bodies, many of them children and a few women and elderly men. Most of the bodies appeared ashen or pale but with no visible injuries. About a dozen were wrapped in blankets.

Other footage showed doctors treating people in makeshift clinics. One video showed the bodies of a dozen people lying on the floor of a clinic, with no visible wounds. The narrator in the video said they were all members of a single family. In a corridor outside lay another five bodies.

A Syrian military officer appeared on state television and said the allegations were untrue, and a sign of "hysteria and floundering" by Assad's opponents. Information Minister Omran Zoabi said the allegations were "illogical and fabricated".

The head of the opposition Syrian National Coalition said Assad's forces had carried out a massacre: "This is a chance for the (U.N. inspectors) to see with their own eyes this massacre and know that this regime is a criminal one," Ahmed Jarba said.

could be true, could be fabricated psy-ops, could even be a false flag.

at this point we don;t really know jack squat but watch as the drums of war beat even louder. i never thought assad was a good guy, but that was never the point to me anyways. fact is the West has no right to undermine Syrian sovereignty and sending arms to the rebels has escalated the conflict and made things worse.

also: this news comes after our buddies in Egypt massacred some 500+ protesters. yet all Obama does there is "freeze" military aid and we're supposed to be satisfied.

#2
u mad ;D
#3
Witnesses report seeing Tom leaving the vicinity
#4
The sad thing is that gas death can easily be prevented. watch this educational documentary: syXr2Rvlcrg
#5
i'm sure people have had to ride together in a car with tom before, but i don't see the UN up in arms about that
#6
thats the joke..
#7

ilmdge posted:

thats the joke..



you are

#8
Wow didn't know Tom fwrted haha. On the ppl who died. Who died because of his farts.
#9
im a real stinker
#10
*Tom, gassing the thread*
#11
i think they've upped the number to like 1,000 (over 9,000)
#12
i guess no one here wants to defend assad anymore so we're just joking about tom's farts lmao
#13
The Lion* Assad, comrade
#14

HenryKrinkle posted:

i guess no one here wants to defend assad anymore

are you shitting me? i still love assad



planet's not running out of people.

#15

(Reuters) - Syrian activists accused President Bashar al-Assad's forces of launching a gas attack that killed nearly 500 people on Wednesday, in what would, if confirmed, be by far the worst reported use of chemical arms in the two-year-old civil war.

An opposition monitoring group, citing figures compiled from medical clinics in the Damascus suburbs, put the death toll at 494 - 90 percent of them killed by gas, the rest by bombing and conventional arms.

so the gas attack killed nearly 500 people... but... (494)(0.9) = 445 people killed by gas... not "nearly 500"... article contradicts itself in first paragraphs. lion assad.

#16
they changed the article later to say "hundreds" were killed btw... can't even keep their filthy story straight... noobs. lion assad.
#17

HenryKrinkle posted:

i guess no one here wants to defend assad anymore so we're just joking about tom's farts lmao



you got our number krink.

#18

HenryKrinkle posted:

i guess no one here wants to defend assad anymore so we're just joking about tom's farts lmao

this seems like an event worth noting and i guess you can ask "what really happened" and "will this change things" but the answer to those questions are pretty much "we'll see" and "we'll see." the D&D thread lieks to livewatch and crap its pants over every youtube video or make asinine prognistications or whatever... but ive already felt basically like you for what seems like a long time now (a couple of years??), which is "dunno about assad, dont see any reason to intervene in this country's civil war, don't see any reason to expect better from the rebels, especially given what happened after we overthrew qaddafi in libya, which sucked because he was legitimately rad and i wouldve liked to have a beer with him

#19
wait do you seriously think assad isn't using gas lol

the revisionist narrative people are creating around assad is really hilarious
#20

ilmdge posted:

the D&D thread lieks to livewatch and crap its pants over every youtube video or make asinine prognistications or whatever

twitter's probably worse in this respect and it gets really annoying.

i follow a lot of palestinian solidarity accounts and some of them really hate assad but when pressed they probably would oppose intervening.

#21
FARTY FART DING DONG TOWN
#22

babyfinland posted:

wait do you seriously think assad isn't using gas lol

the revisionist narrative people are creating around assad is really hilarious



FWIW: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/05/us-syria-crisis-un-idUSBRE94409Z20130505

#23

HenryKrinkle posted:

babyfinland posted:

wait do you seriously think assad isn't using gas lol

the revisionist narrative people are creating around assad is really hilarious

FWIW: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/05/us-syria-crisis-un-idUSBRE94409Z20130505



yeah probably everyone is doing horrendous shit to everyone, its a war

#24

babyfinland posted:

wait do you seriously think assad isn't using gas lol

the revisionist narrative people are creating around assad is really hilarious

i said we'll see what happened later. some guy posted something in d&d thread with no source saying it was a rogue syrian officer who did the chemical attack. someone else asked for a link but everyone in the thread ignored him and just started talking like it was definitely true. my point is trying to do a play-by-play of everything that happens in a war when you;'re some dope on another continent is pretty stupid.

#25

ilmdge posted:

babyfinland posted:

wait do you seriously think assad isn't using gas lol

the revisionist narrative people are creating around assad is really hilarious

i said we'll see what happened later. some guy posted something in d&d thread with no source saying it was a rogue syrian officer who did the chemical attack. someone else asked for a link but everyone in the thread ignored him and just started talking like it was definitely true. my point is trying to do a play-by-play of everything that happens in a war when you;'re some dope on another continent is pretty stupid.



i was talking to krinkle.

and yes trying to follow this and without knowing arabic is completely pointless

#26
http://syrianperspective.blogspot.com/ this blog is great tho
#27
before this though i dont think there was anything that concrete about assad using chemical weapons? esp since i think it's right to be skeptical of reports when you consider the west may be looking for some good "wmd" shit to justify intervention. crow had posted some articles about a contractor being hired to plant evidence. im not really invested in trying to argue he's never used chem weapons though either because as stated it's a war and they're all probably doing horrendous shit
#28
i havent really been following this stuff at all but someone who has is explaining to me that obama said it was a "red line" for intervention so i guess thats kind of suspicious? i mean in terms of "assad would never do such a thing" thats absurd but in terms of obama trying to manufacture a reason to escalate things yeah sure.
#29
GEORGE GALLOWAY KABONKS BRITISH BIGOT REPORTER'S INSIPIDITY ON THE AIR!! IT'S SO INSPIRING TO HEAR THIS WONDERFUL MAN WITH HIS AWESOME SCOTTISH BURR TURN THIS VIRAGO INTO SO MUCH SPOTTED DICK!!!
#30
Farmer Crack-Ass posted:
If you wanted to take a bloody-minded approach to it, you could probably bomb Syrian government facilities and military bases and attempt to remove the logistical advantage they have over the rebels, and let the rebels overrun and massacre the government loyalists. Couple that with repeated pronouncements that "we will not tolerate governments that use nerve gas on their people, this is what happens to such maniacs", and theoretically you might see a minor deterrent effect on any other tinpot dictators with an eye to this kind of bloodshed.
-----------------------------------
To be perfectly honest, I'd be ok with that. Historically, U.S.A foreign policy has been a hell of a lot worse than "if you gas your citizens, we will push your shit in from the skies and let the rabble tear the survivors apart." This would be an improvement.
#31
Whilst installing a no-fly-zone would indeed benefit rebels the most it doesn't have to be aimed at toppling Assad and replacing it with another murderous government. If I recall correctly the UN resolution for NATO intervention in Libya wasn't to topple Gaddafi but in order to protect 'civilians'. I remember some warnings made by NATO officials that they would also used force against rebels if they would start massacres themselves. A similar strategy in Syria could also allow NATO to strike at Al-Nusra forces massacring whatever Kurdish village.
#32
I'm typically anything but a fan of the neocon "bombs solve everything!" position on things but this guy, can't we send a couple of tomahawks to whatever building he holes up in and remove him from the planet? Who is still backing him at this point? Putin? Fuck him, he's not gonna start shit with the US/NATO over Assad, especially when he's so busy violently persecuting homosexuals.
#33

HenryKrinkle posted:

i guess no one here wants to defend assad anymore so we're just joking about tom's farts lmao



yeah this forum is really really bad and i need to be made all powerful to enact swift heavy handed judgment

#34
check this out henry: http://truth-out.org/news/item/18279-how-billionaire-philanthropy-is-fueling-inequality-and-helping-to-destroy-the-country

nothing thats a revelation but Cool Article
#35
best case scenario imo the government survives and is held accountable by all the loyalists they've armed and promises they've made. then maybe some organizing and a arab spring revolt for democracy or whatever and some theorybros get elected and syrians won't have to live under The Lion Neoliberalism. baby you got a stew going
#36
i think the next 6 months will be crucial
#37
more like the lyin assad
#38

ilmdge posted:

babyfinland posted:

wait do you seriously think assad isn't using gas lol

the revisionist narrative people are creating around assad is really hilarious

i said we'll see what happened later. some guy posted something in d&d thread with no source saying it was a rogue syrian officer who did the chemical attack. someone else asked for a link but everyone in the thread ignored him and just started talking like it was definitely true. my point is trying to do a play-by-play of everything that happens in a war when you;'re some dope on another continent is pretty stupid.



it was me, i'm the guy who was asking for a link and then he quoted me the Mezzah Coordinating Council for the death toll and Google Maps image of the areas hit but said that the rogue syrian officer (who's not actually rogue, apparently) avenging his dead son claim has no sources because "it's dangerous to give sources"

#39
gassing people is worse than dropping bombs on them - fact
#40
Would the apparent DIY nature of the munitions have anything to do with the Israeli airstrikes from a few months ago? Just a thought exercise, but if the Israelis actually did target a chemical site and were successful, the Syrian military might have been forced to improvise.