betraying the ideals of the left is why stalin Owned the Zone
"wah wah why did they depict stalin as irrationally brutal and destructive, violent. im so pomo, reactionary"
a true communist applauds this image of stalin and demands an encore
babyfinland posted:
"wah wah we need irrational brutality and desutrction, violence. so pomo im reactionary"
"wah wah why did they depict stalin as irrationally brutal and destructive, violent. im so pomo, reactionary"
a true communist applauds this image of stalin and demands an encore
Beautiful little strawman, but seriously, don't do it again.
Point is, ChucklefUck, you posted a thing from a tr0t. You love tr0ts. You are tr0t. Tr0T0
babyfinland posted:
i think you have to be a communist to be a trot
the opposite, actually.
thirdplace posted:
stalin is kind of a non-sequitur
yes. everyone else was a new thinker, but Stalin was just a Leninist. It's weird to lump him in with minds like Marx, Lenin, Mao - where they were ideologues, he was a statesman.
babyfinland posted:
i think you have to be a communist to be a trot
Actually u will be surprised to find out that a trot is the opposite of acommunist
babyfinland posted:
thats gotta be the worst voice on that adam smith i've ever heard on an adam smith
Crow posted:babyfinland posted:thats gotta be the worst voice on that adam smith i've ever heard on an adam smith
i thoguht it was supposed to be his wife until i saw the credits