NoFreeWill posted:I searched my library for Death on the Installment Plan and found this because of a chapter title
http://www.amazon.com/Conjuring-Hitler-Guido-Giacomo-Preparata/dp/074532181X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1350007825&sr=8-1&keywords=conjuring+hitler
anyone read this it looks kewl
I remember one of the conclusions drawn in the book being that Lenin and the other Bolshevik were British sleeper agents
da: this man is a bad man, he needs to go to jail!
pd: this man is a not-so-bad man, he needs to get not so much jail!
judge: hmmm, this man is going to jail and lots of it.
rinse, repeat, ad infinitum
deadken posted:trifles for a massacre is the best celine
yeah
kinch posted:read the rebirth of history on the train and feeling healthy for the first time in six monthh
that looks cool, i might pick that up. If anybody knows anything else good about mob dynamics and such let me know, i've heard that Crowds and Power is good and i've just ordered that
"Nothing attracts a crowd like a crowd"
the problem for me is more what zizek might say to that, which is, don't afraid to be "big" - you can't just needle the state with demands, you need to be prepared to take power or else you aren't credible. but badiou can't accept that because his belief is that path has already exhausted itself. but zizek's reply to that is that the idea of acting at a distance to the state was actually the first to fail: councilism didn't seem to work in the early 20th century, while social-democracy and leninism both were failures in their own way.
Makeshift_Swahili posted:im reading City Of Quartz but i dont know very much about LA so maybe im wasting my time. its ok so far
If you’ve ever seen a movie you know all about it, LA is the conscience of western civilization
btw if you like the style but want something that covers more ground you might find more relevant, check out slum planet
getfiscal posted:badiou's book is interesting because it is basically trying to describe in detail the process involved in something like tahrir square, but to the point of then describing how to go beyond a simple protest and turn it into a full revolution. like he says that at a certain level we all accept that such crowds are engaged in a sort of truth procedure and that we can easily recognize these crowds as the true voice of egypt or whatever, and by extension of all oppressed people. and he's like so all we need to do is find some way to have a sort of tahrir square moment that is transformed directly into a movement against the state in general by a sort of vanguard that can make a series of demands against the state that cause it to buckle into new forms of organization or something. and he admits this isn't clear, he's just saying it's how it has to happen logically, like he says it's not a possibility so much as a possibility of a possibility.
the problem for me is more what zizek might say to that, which is, don't afraid to be "big" - you can't just needle the state with demands, you need to be prepared to take power or else you aren't credible. but badiou can't accept that because his belief is that path has already exhausted itself. but zizek's reply to that is that the idea of acting at a distance to the state was actually the first to fail: councilism didn't seem to work in the early 20th century, while social-democracy and leninism both were failures in their own way.
kinch posted:read the rebirth of history on the train and feeling healthy for the first time in six monthh
Agnus_Dei posted:I recently finished reading the book of Leviticus.
what did you learn
discipline posted:has anyone read this? I think it looks good
too bad it's a myth: http://www.revleft.com/vb/irish-american-victim-t155526/index.html