#1
[account deactivated]
#2
my theory is that iraq was transparently a national project by the US and its closest lapdogs whereas libya had broad-ranging support from all the west, truly a global initiative, resembling more probably serbia in this regard than iraq
#3
I donno, the media seems to be behaving pretty similar as it did during the lead up to the Iraq War. It was only afterwards that the Pragmatic Liberals started being Critically Constructive
#4

Impper posted:
my theory is that iraq was transparently a national project by the US and its closest lapdogs whereas libya had broad-ranging support from all the west, truly a global initiative, resembling more probably serbia in this regard than iraq


I think a lot of people are buying into it because it was well timed (Arab Spring) to coincide with legitimate liberation movements and that there are these rebels to showcase as heros. I suppose the same could have been done in Iraq with Kurds or Shi'ites but the context was different (War on Terror).

#5
i'm going to hold my opinion until james petras weighs in on the newest developments
#6
[account deactivated]
#7
[account deactivated]
#8

discipline posted:
qadaafi did so much for libya. so. much. read a goddamn book.


Green Book

#9
i read parts of the green book when i was 13. it was cool.
#10
one of the strangest things about libya is how people discount every accomplishment and metric of national progress, either because it's "welfare state and not socialist," or "libya had unfair advantages that true impoverished countries do not enjoy" and the first one is a strange criticism at the least and the second one is a plain lie. doesnt stop the same people who call for "nuanced views" from using both
#11

getfiscal posted:
i read parts of the green book when i was 13. it was cool.


one of the stories in gaddafis book is about how the city's basic level of organization leads to alienation, i bet he isnt thinking this now that he's relying on the terrain of tripoli to live

#12

babyfinland posted:
Impper posted:
my theory is that iraq was transparently a national project by the US and its closest lapdogs whereas libya had broad-ranging support from all the west, truly a global initiative, resembling more probably serbia in this regard than iraq

I think a lot of people are buying into it because it was well timed (Arab Spring) to coincide with legitimate liberation movements and that there are these rebels to showcase as heros. I suppose the same could have been done in Iraq with Kurds or Shi'ites but the context was different (War on Terror).


yeah kurds and shi'ites just didn't fit that narrative that well, plus there was the issue of geography where the rebels could charge across the desert lawrence of arabia style

#13
i hope gaddafi dies by getting hit with a nato bomb then a gang of rebels & africans & one of his african mercenaries & one of his ukrainian female bodyguards cannibalize him, tearing the flesh away bit by bit and feeding him the marrow from his own bones - it would make his book my most prized possession. limonov could only pray for a death rivalling that
#14

Impper posted:
i hope gaddafi dies by getting hit with a nato bomb then a gang of rebels & africans & one of his african mercenaries & one of his ukrainian female bodyguards cannibalize him, tearing the flesh away bit by bit and feeding him the marrow from his own bones - it would make his book my most prized possession. limonov could only pray for a death rivalling that


same

#15
Libya could have been a paradise and it would still be Right To Rebel. Liberal-democracy or death. Or liberal-democracy and death: Even better.
#16

Impper posted:
one of the strangest things about libya is how people discount every accomplishment and metric of national progress, either because it's "welfare state and not socialist," or "libya had unfair advantages that true impoverished countries do not enjoy" and the first one is a strange criticism at the least and the second one is a plain lie. doesnt stop the same people who call for "nuanced views" from using both



given the choice between gaddafi or nato puppet state my answer is "no thanks!" cuz theyre both just as bad as each other dont you see

#17
Give me liberal democracy - death is free
#18

getfiscal posted:
Libya could have been a paradise and it would still be Right To Rebel. Liberal-democracy or death. Or liberal-democracy and death: Even better.


I got no problem with ousting Qadaffi or anything like that. Libya needs reform, no doubt about that. 5 month long bombing campaigns and rape gangs not so much

#19

babyfinland posted:
I got no problem with ousting Qadaffi or anything like that.

That reminds me I have a cake but I want to eat it and still have the cake this dilemma confuses me.

#20

getfiscal posted:

babyfinland posted:
I got no problem with ousting Qadaffi or anything like that.

That reminds me I have a cake but I want to eat it and still have the cake this dilemma confuses me.


don't play dumb donald. I mean if there's a truly democratic uprising as in Syria then fine, but this is a sectarian and NATO backed destruction of the entire society. There's a huge difference between the two (namely, the quality of the lives of thousands of normal people who just want to live decently)

#21
Living normally isn't decent. One must commit to history or become a walking corpse.
#22

getfiscal posted:
babyfinland posted:
I got no problem with ousting Qadaffi or anything like that.
That reminds me I have a cake but I want to eat it and still have the cake this dilemma confuses me.


By the waters
The waters
Of Babylon.

We lay down and wept
And wept
For thee Zion.

We remember
Thee remember
Thee remember
Thee Zion


i read this as you literally having a piece of cake and wanting to eat it, and got confused for a moment as to why you would share this information

#23
Assassination Attempts Against Independent Journalists in Libya

http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628192

In the morning, Dr Franklin Lamb, director of the Americans for Middle East Peace, who has consistently put out live interviews from his hotel room where he has shared gathered intelligence and information with the YouTube community, was shot in the leg by a sniper while cycling near his hotel.

Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, a researcher, also narrowly escaped death from a sniper targeting him as he stepped out of the hotel to place a sign saying "PRESS", and was additionally threatened by CNN journalists.

Thierry Meyssan, who runs the French VoltaireNet blog, said that from the Rixos Hotel, the order was given by so-called "journalists" from the United States to bring down Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Thierry Meyssan.



Edited by Crow ()

#24
(he talks about undercover spies as western journalists at about 2:25)

Edited by Crow ()

#25
Mr. Ali Al Issawi
A political and education Libyan who was born in the city of Benghazi in 1966. Has a PhD in pivatisation obtained from the Academy of Economic Studies in Bucharest Romania. He occupied the position of Minister of Economy, Trade and Investment in Libya, and was the youngest minister to fill such a post. Before taking the ministerial position, he founded the Centre for Export Development in 2006 and became the first Director General for it. He also assumed the position of Director General for the Ownership expansion program (privatization fund) in 2005.
#26
apparently the rebels / western press lied about saif al islam being captured http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/spotlight/libya/2011/08/2011822235934828611.html
#27
[account deactivated]
#28
[account deactivated]
#29
wow there is some egg on juan carlos' face now.. haha!
#30
[account deactivated]
#31
pretty smart for a few teenagers.
#32

discipline posted:
I just imagine this barrage of rebels all selling interviews to western media mouthpieces, each with a claim more outrageous than the last.


and they're all doing it from the safety of qatar or whatever. literally all the msm sources were "reported from " and included mondo quotes from the ground

#33

Impper posted:

discipline posted:
I just imagine this barrage of rebels all selling interviews to western media mouthpieces, each with a claim more outrageous than the last.

and they're all doing it from the safety of qatar or whatever. literally all the msm sources were "reported from " and included mondo quotes from the ground


On CNN today I heard the reporter go "For the latest on Libya, we go to Martha's Vineyard"

#34
#35
oops double post, stupid internet
#36

discipline posted:
qadaafi did so much for libya. so. much. read a goddamn book.



In the beginning, yes. When he was extolling pan-Arabism in the likeness of Sadat, one can make a case that he was a Chavez like figure in Libya.

Last 15 years, at least, have been a shitstorm as he's turned Libya into a rentier state that benefits his family almost exclusively. Trace the money: Qadaafi is heft investor in Italian, French, and American banking assets (including some that lost a great deal of their value in 2008) and yet he's done little to improve the educational infrastructure of Libya. Educated citizens would only upset his rule.

#37
[account deactivated]
#38
[account deactivated]
#39
abu khalil lays down the sickest burns
#40
i've learned not to buy into the whole "dictators are crazy!!" thing like clearly kim jong il isn't crazy but i kind of wonder when it comes to gadaffi. not even the whole "kids on drugs and al qaeda" thing which is half-true anyway, but the fact that he sees himself as a leader of african revolution in general to the point he ended up supporting anyone and everyone. i mean blaise compaore? and france isnt even grateful. do you see what happens larry? this is what happens. i mean the dude literally fessed up to committing acts of terror he didn't do just to be the prodigal son to the west. sorry. no dice.