#1
[account deactivated]
#2
Post rating: ~
So we were seeing this documentary about moneys that had this segment about the cotton industry in burkina faso and how the world bank forces them to keep growing & exporting raw cotton instead of actually doing profitable shit with it like manufacturing taxtile and how american protectionism for domestic cotton actually deprives burkina faso of nearly 300 million euros a year, thanks to your old thread about neo-liberalism i was able to explain to the mrs neo-liberal policy and the IMF involvement and how rich people are bonafide life sucking vampires and the such.

so thank you for making informative threads, occasionally (backhanded jewish insult).

#3
[account deactivated]
#4
Post rating: +
#5
Post rating: ~
Grove City College lol

foremost college for austrian economics in the U.S., filled to the brim with evangelicals, and 2nd most unfriendly campus to LGBT in north america
#6
Post rating: +

aerdil posted:

foremost college for austrian economics in the U.S., filled to the brim with evangelicals, and 2nd most unfriendly campus to LGBT in north america



welcome to the rhizzone

#7
[account deactivated]
#8
Goldgelbes Löwenäffchen
Post rating: +

Ironicwarcriminal posted:


founder and consumer of FrogTech

#9
Post rating: ~
I'm shocked she's a mining heiress.
#10
Post rating: ~
nice av fiz
#11
Post rating: ~
economist said a thing
#12
tardy on these heaters
Post rating: ~
#13
meet me in st louis
Post rating: +
Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
#14
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
she should learn how to mutter in latin and wear robes and then maybe people would think she deserved to live in a palace
#15
Post rating: ~
seriously, i think we'd all feel much more comfortable if these egomaniacs would just admit they think they're favored by god cause they are just so fantastic as human beings; theological objectivism is so much more aesthetically compatible with the lives of the bourgeoisie aristocracy than the randroid dawkinite variety, what with its focus on the aesthetics of *the struggle* which is so vacant from from their lives.