shennong posted:stegosaurus posted:babyfinland posted:stegosaurus posted:Tinkzorg posted:also shennong i want to learn enough about all of this so that i can at least be literate and draw my own conclusions with regards to what sort of political prescriptions we need. i dont have a green thumb but its obvious to me that this is important.
any sort of reading tips about like everything from agricultural history to the theoretical and practical basis for horticulture and so on would be really appreciated.im reading "radical agriculture" edited by murray book chin.
lol why would you do that
someone on badgame recommended it. some of the essays are bs but some are ok.
whats it talk about? i havent read much bookchin but other than a kind of fixation w/ new england style council democracy and agriculture he seems like a useful antidote to primitivism
there are probably twenty essays in it on topics like the land grant college complex, the use of fossil fuels in agriculture, the displacement of rural labor, the notion of efficiency etc. I was kind of worried from the introduction, bookchin actually sounds more primitivist in his introduction than anybody I've read so far in the actual book. the essays are ok, the analysis is pretty good (the essay on the land-grant college complex is probably the most revealing so far, the other ones are good but are stuff that you've basically posted in this thread already) but as usual the suggestions are naomi-klein level, like, write your congressman or send money to my fringe lobbying group.
and as you mentioned there is a kind of perverted focus on preserving the Jeffersonian family farm. every once in a while a reference to low-wage rural labor crops up (tee hee) but the main focus is on preserving the single family farm which may, as they argue, be the most efficient agricultural unit but can't possibly be the main labor force in rural areas. I haven't gotten to the essay about rural labor organization yet so maybe that will be a different story. overall ok, good introduction, not a lot of primitivism (a few people have explicitly said "no going back to the mule and plow," just re-tool capitalist technology to the proper scale), but terrible plans for action.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:Climate change is definitely going to be the next Big Scare to fall by the wayside
Nuclear war, SARS, the millennium bug, overpopulation, the coming “ice age” in the 70s. There’s obviously big money in fearmongering but I think people are waking up to it.
Uh Bro, all of those were real problems that were addressed once they were publicized
the whole idea of a coming 'ice age' in the 70s, that rush limbaugh types always love to cite as proof that no scientist is ever right about anything, was due to the fact that large particulate pollution, prevalent since the industrial revolution, causes cooling. It was strongly regulated soon after. it just so happens that the small particulate stuff that causes global warming was allowed to continue on, and here we are
i just don't think people should live their lives in fear
Myfanwy posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:Climate change is definitely going to be the next Big Scare to fall by the wayside
Nuclear war, SARS, the millennium bug, overpopulation, the coming “ice age” in the 70s. There’s obviously big money in fearmongering but I think people are waking up to it.Uh Bro, all of those were real problems that were addressed once they were publicized
the whole idea of a coming 'ice age' in the 70s, that rush limbaugh types always love to cite as proof that no scientist is ever right about anything, was due to the fact that large particulate pollution, prevalent since the industrial revolution, causes cooling. It was strongly regulated soon after. it just so happens that the small particulate stuff that causes global warming was allowed to continue on, and here we are
Hmm, maybe we should allow some of that large particulate pollution back so that the cooling and warming balance out.
tbqh is sounds like more excuses from the false gods of science
Alyosha posted:Myfanwy posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:Climate change is definitely going to be the next Big Scare to fall by the wayside
Nuclear war, SARS, the millennium bug, overpopulation, the coming “ice age” in the 70s. There’s obviously big money in fearmongering but I think people are waking up to it.Uh Bro, all of those were real problems that were addressed once they were publicized
the whole idea of a coming 'ice age' in the 70s, that rush limbaugh types always love to cite as proof that no scientist is ever right about anything, was due to the fact that large particulate pollution, prevalent since the industrial revolution, causes cooling. It was strongly regulated soon after. it just so happens that the small particulate stuff that causes global warming was allowed to continue on, and here we areHmm, maybe we should allow some of that large particulate pollution back so that the cooling and warming balance out.
It's worth a shot
Alyosha posted:Hmm, maybe we should allow some of that large particulate pollution back so that the cooling and warming balance out.
it's got way shorter lifetime in the atmosphere than CO2 so we'd just be doubly fucked in a few decades or w/e
anyway it seems heat wave/drought and gm-resistant pests are already fucking shit up for US corn in twenty fucking twelve so maybe I won't get my decade or so of prep time; guess it's time to switch to Endgame C, ignore everything and just consume the shit out of unsustainable goods while they're still here
Note: Graph neglects that the historical CO2 changes lag behind the temperature changes by about 800 years. Climate scientists universally accept that the causality implied by Mr. Gore here is the direct opposite of the actual causality.
stegosaurus posted:shennong posted:stegosaurus posted:babyfinland posted:stegosaurus posted:Tinkzorg posted:also shennong i want to learn enough about all of this so that i can at least be literate and draw my own conclusions with regards to what sort of political prescriptions we need. i dont have a green thumb but its obvious to me that this is important.
any sort of reading tips about like everything from agricultural history to the theoretical and practical basis for horticulture and so on would be really appreciated.im reading "radical agriculture" edited by murray book chin.
lol why would you do that
someone on badgame recommended it. some of the essays are bs but some are ok.
whats it talk about? i havent read much bookchin but other than a kind of fixation w/ new england style council democracy and agriculture he seems like a useful antidote to primitivism
there are probably twenty essays in it on topics like the land grant college complex, the use of fossil fuels in agriculture, the displacement of rural labor, the notion of efficiency etc. I was kind of worried from the introduction, bookchin actually sounds more primitivist in his introduction than anybody I've read so far in the actual book. the essays are ok, the analysis is pretty good (the essay on the land-grant college complex is probably the most revealing so far, the other ones are good but are stuff that you've basically posted in this thread already) but as usual the suggestions are naomi-klein level, like, write your congressman or send money to my fringe lobbying group.
and as you mentioned there is a kind of perverted focus on preserving the Jeffersonian family farm. every once in a while a reference to low-wage rural labor crops up (tee hee) but the main focus is on preserving the single family farm which may, as they argue, be the most efficient agricultural unit but can't possibly be the main labor force in rural areas. I haven't gotten to the essay about rural labor organization yet so maybe that will be a different story. overall ok, good introduction, not a lot of primitivism (a few people have explicitly said "no going back to the mule and plow," just re-tool capitalist technology to the proper scale), but terrible plans for action.
that sounds about right. the jeffersonian farm thing is kind of redolent of proudhounian ideal of village-scale political economy so i understand why they're attached to the idea, it's just not at all clear how you get from here to there. soemtimes im not really sure what "there" is in that context either, like how does usufruct yeomanry work exactly
Analysts, especially those working from a class model of society, have proceeded on the assumption that warrior cults were and must have been divorced from those practised by the commoners.43 (As is clear, I see the warrior as very firmly integrated into the general society, however headily exclusive the highest orders might have been.) Others assume the division on historical grounds: that the warrior cult was imported from the nomadic north, and so came to be practised in parallel with the indigenous rites of the valley farmers.44 Spaniards and the Europeans who came after them have presented an urban-imperial image of Tenochtitlin, with its splendid hierarchies of priests and warriors and its whole sections of artisans and mechants. But it was a city green with growing things, banked with the chinampas, the ingenious system of shallow-water agriculture which had brought the Aztecs their first prosperity. The bulk of the population were not agriculturalists, but those specialist artisans and priests and warriors lived in a vegetable-growers' world, and the centrality of agriculture to their lives could not have been in doubt.
The chinampas required men's exquisite manipulations of earth, seeds, sun and water in an alchemy of vegetable abundance. It was highly precise cultivation, its small stages laid out from when each seed in its individual block of earth, covered against frost, watered by hand, was raised until it was brought to sprout, and then transferred to the only slightly less intensive cultivation of the chinampa. The chinampa itself was formed by the piling of thick mats of water weed, which provided a fibrous, permeable, and slowly composting base for the rich silt dredged up from the lake bottom. More water could be scooped up at need. Today the few surviving chinamperos protect their plants from frost or excessive rain and sun by blankets of straw, or light structures of sticks and mats, and in the sixteenth century the materials, needs and skills were there to do the same.45
The Aztec seasonal ritual calendar was geared to the most precisely observed and minutely differentiated stages of vegetable growth. Those stages must have been derived from observation of the "green- house" chinampas, as they were well in advance of the natural season of the lakeside fields. I would further argue that the chinampas not only made Tenochtitlin experientially an agricultural city, and that the plants so raised provided essential ritual equipment - models of what was to come - for ceremonies designed to influence growth in the open fields, but that those highly visible chinampa manipulations provided the model for men's part in the natural order, and for their role in aiding the growth of essential foods. In the Feast of the Flaying of Men, when the chinampa city turned from the business of war to the growing of things, those manipulations of earth, water, sun and seed through which men found their sustenance were explored through the symbolic medium of the human body, and the interde- pendence between agriculturalist and warrior set out. (Clendinnen, "The Cost of Courage in Aztec Society")
I held a festival of first fruits in my backyard a couple weeks ago where I gave the first nine raspberries, a roma tomato and a smallish onion over to ceres. I have a portable shrine made out of a black tree bucket that I can just pull out of the window well whenever I need it.
http://zinelibrary.info/files/Scott%20JC%20-%20The%20Art%20of%20Not%20Being%20Governed%20-%20An%20Anarchist%20History%20of%20Upland%20Southeast%20Asia.pdf
shennong posted:courtesy thirdplace heres the book referred to in tha op
http://zinelibrary.info/files/Scott%20JC%20-%20The%20Art%20of%20Not%20Being%20Governed%20-%20An%20Anarchist%20History%20of%20Upland%20Southeast%20Asia.pdf
yesss
http://zinelibrary.info/files/Seeing%20Like%20a%20State_%20How%20Certain%20Schemes%20to%20Improve%20the%20Human%20Condition%20Have%20Failed%20-%20James%20C.%20Scott.pdf
tpaine posted:yeah thanks. definitely superior to toabnbg
came across this thread. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2895145&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=7#post345962620 your posts in it are good. thats all
also unfunny
Edited by thirdplace ()
babyfinland posted:https://www.resilientcommunities.com/abundant-ponds-brilliant-chinese-wheelbarrows-and-diy-algae-reactorsis this cool
chinese wheelbarrows own, i linked to a lo tech mag article about them on the first page i think. the algae thing might be useful if you had a lot of dirty water you wanted to cycle nutrients out of i guess but i cant think of any reason to deliberately feed algae otherwise. it'll grow as a byproduct of any aquaculture operation so you may as well raise fish or sth if you're gonna grow it
what happens after all the methane is released and we have a runaway reaction where we're fucked forever
global revolution and a new global reign of terror where robespierre II murders every capitalist?
jools posted:no, most people die Lol
But they are the same!!!
rice9 posted:http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jKKr0IRUKbR6Se7mFZu_qfcFWZTw?docId=CNG.fecc4bb8fd%202384ef8b3d22269087bee4.1f1what happens after all the methane is released and we have a runaway reaction where we're fucked forever
global revolution and a new global reign of terror where robespierre II murders every capitalist?
the same thing that those drought charts ive been posting everywhere say is going to happen, only a lot faster
AmericanNazbro posted:it would take months or maybe years to move the means of production to a more temperate climate in order to prevent crop failures. in any case, millions will die of starvation. people will riot because of that, millions more will die. tens of millions will ultimately die. the state will become more authoritarian and ideology will probably shift towards social democrat or fascist, same meaning for different geographies
we literally don't have granaries in north america anymore, it would definitely take at least a couple years to rebuild any kind of resilience to fluctuations in crop yields, and we're probably headed into a period of low yields anyway so it's unlikely we can build grain supplies sufficient to see out more than a couple years of severe drought