sosie posted:
copjec is for real. she takes on, in "read my desire", judith butler, and, by her criticism of butler, renders Lacan clearer than anyone could ask - which made me once say to getfiscal that he should become more critical - i still believe that only by circumscribing something False can you create something new

but not only that - babyfinland is a pervert. he isn't a proper person. getfiscal might be something if he gets over himself. and discipline could be anything

what did you just call me

babyfinland posted:

sosie posted:
copjec is for real. she takes on, in "read my desire", judith butler, and, by her criticism of butler, renders Lacan clearer than anyone could ask - which made me once say to getfiscal that he should become more critical - i still believe that only by circumscribing something False can you create something new

but not only that - babyfinland is a pervert. he isn't a proper person. getfiscal might be something if he gets over himself. and discipline could be anything

what did you just call me

i dunno what i called you but i know a number of things: you are disgusting, racist, you feed off the bile of small children,

you are a bad man. you either need help, or are literally a psychopath and should run out onto the freeway~

tpaine posted:

i really enjoyed her article in Lacan: the silent partners and also fuck you

is that "'Lacan: the Silent Partners' and also fuck you" or "'Lacan: the Silent Partners and also Fuck You'"

maybe a lil bit o both

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jwCA_aMvL54

Edited by Crow (Oct. 19, 2011 05:46:03)

sosie posted:
whoever it was who found their little nest of being in constantly telling everone to read lacan the silent partner - i for a long time felt that it would be mean to call you out. but honestly. what was your obsession with that book? and have you ever looked back and considered the damage you've done?

Hahahahha
May I also interest you, in, A Particulare Tale, of Song & ice?

Crow posted:
You trolled me into reading a Badas book? U monster. Surely you are not some sorta badas cool avatar motherfucker, and surely I am mistekn. For Lord, how hath The reeds wrought the pond? How hath the Farmer milked his Lot. Hath she smake from the Pipe? Lord, O Lords, a curse to drank from the Lot of Kool Words.. alas, but these words were not Made of Me... signed, fucktard, idiot

same

babyfinland posted:
just shut up and obey the law you two

I am obeying the law retard, you are the Actual deegenerate, trying to poison The lot, I'm wise to you

deadken posted:
if u read a scene from a longer work without context you might not have a full & complete understanding of it tho?

györgy konrád said that even if a reader was presented with a random sentence cut off from your work, it alone should be enough to give them something to think about.

i used to think of that as trite but after every new great novel read i agree with it more and more. heres a randomly chosen sentence from his work (i just opened the book at a random page and pointed at one) "He smiles picturing a situation that was under his control alone"

lets be more lenient and just cut off a genuinely randomly chosen string of a couple sentences from master & margarita

"Natasha opened her fist and revealed some gold coins. Margarita turned her questioning eyes to Woland. He nodded. That's when Natasha threw herself to Margaritas embrace, gave her a melodramatic kiss and triumphantly flew out the window."

now, i translated those from the finnish editions so they prolly dont make you feel like the originals or the (really hella good) finnish translations do. but i get genuine joy of living just from those few sentences without any context. the feeling that you get when you read prose by masters. that were all just people, livin within our surroundings, interacting with other people. thats its ok. its gonna be ok. what im sayin is, every scene should be enjoyable, meaningful and a joy to read out of context. a really good thing every writer should do is at least in their mind give every chapter a title to the tune of "chapter 8, where..."

so is the imppers scene "chapter 3, where a conversation is had in miloses car" or "where the girl learns about the two friends" or "where we meet miloses car". whatever one chooses, that has to be the focus of the chapter and explicitly so. a whole bunch of other stuff can happen of course, but they should not be something that the reader needs to remember later in the story. or i guess you can go super rhizomatic and not give a fuck but then you reeeeaaally need to be a master of your craft and have a super sharp hattori hanzo of a style

the bird brains word christlove is a really really good one btw. ponder on it, all.