Tsargon posted:smashing the shit out of the goddamn romans
what's your prob w/the romans
e: a book that is
on cd or a codex, either is fine
Edited by The_Schliski ()
The_Schliski posted:also does anyone have a good herstory recommendation for the caliphates, e.g. umayyad &c. i.e.
marshall hodgson is the best survey of islamic history
its pretty big and dense but yeah Killa
The_Schliski posted:I like big and dense
http://www.amazon.com/The-Venture-Islam-Volume-Classical/dp/0226346838/ref=pd_sim_b_1
getfiscal posted:the quran is basically battlefield earth for arabs
what is their "love is a battlefield" though
HEY A LITTLE MTV TRIVIA FOR YOU: as we all know "video killed the radio star" was the first video on MTV. the SECOND video, nobody remembers, but it was in fact "love is a battlefield" by pat benatar
babyfinland posted:The_Schliski posted:I like big and dense
http://www.amazon.com/The-Venture-Islam-Volume-Classical/dp/0226346838/ref=pd_sim_b_1
I'm going to read this
http://www.amazon.com/Arab-Syrian-Gentleman-Warrior-Period-Crusades/dp/0231121253/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1336287006&sr=1-1-fkmr1
An Arab-Syrian Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of the Crusades
The_Schliski posted:Tsargon posted:smashing the shit out of the goddamn romans
what's your prob w/the romans
1. heretics
2. its just really impressive
also do you have some problem with orthodox xtians, i kinda like their whole belief in icons as a link to the world of platonic ideals and i once had an russian orthodox use an analogy to describe the trinity in a very elegant way where the holy spirit is sunshine
i cant remember the rest of the analogy so thats kinda useless to you BUT n-e-wayz
The_Schliski posted:but is it really all that impressive to smash a withered empire. im looking at you, mujahideen
is it the mark of a withered empire to attempt conquering afghanistan?
Tsargon posted:1. heretics
2. its just really impressive
All things considered, the Romans (Byzantines) were considerably weakened by Justinian's wars of reconquest, wars with Persia, and a demographic collapse due to plague.
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:yo god damnit crustpunk trotsky ive tried to get that shit out of my head since i saw it 10 years ago or w/e
That's no way to get ahead in life!!!!
girdles_gone_wild posted:Tsargon posted:1. heretics
2. its just really impressiveAll things considered, the Romans (Byzantines) were considerably weakened by Justinian's wars of reconquest, wars with Persia, and a demographic collapse due to plague.
there was a plague? was it just another lap of the black death that hit at an inopportune time or something else?
A Clattering of Choughs
A Dule of Doves
A Parliament of Owls
A Plague of Tsargon Posts
The_Schliski posted:Tsargon posted:smashing the shit out of the goddamn romans
what's your prob w/the romans
The romans were a big joke by the time the caliphate rolled over them, it wasn't really an empire like the roman empire. It was super reliant on client guys. The east romans were basically absentee landlords with a big city in the middle of the world, so they got a piece of everybody else's action. And they only started coming back from defeats against the caliphate when they started smashing all of their icons and raising lots of light cavalry. but mostly the east roman empire was super dysfunctional and people competing for the emperorship would defect to the turks or whoever all the time if it meant they could get some revenge and open up a chance for their guys to kill the sitting emperor or just blind and castrate him. When you read the history it's like, oh I see why they lost all of that so quickly
crustpunk_trotsky posted:the byzantines deserved it for embracing the eastern heresy in this humble ex-goons opinion
I was gonna say that, but I didn't want to sound biased because I believe in the one true faith called catholicisme confession of christianisme
The russians did some good things with the debauched orthodox church for a while, it was very much a lonely pine forest sect, even if there was gold everywhere, but then they ruined it
Tsargon posted:there was a plague? was it just another lap of the black death that hit at an inopportune time or something else?
Well... The plague during Justinian's reign wiped out an incredible percentage of the people in both empires. Shortages of labor, declining populations, not enough soldiers, etc. forced the Byzantines to hire mass amounts of barbarian troops just to fill the ranks. Fast forward 30 years or so, and you get the outbreak of this colossal war between the Byzantines and the Sassanids.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine-Sassanid_War_of_602%E2%80%93628
The two empires basically just exhausted themselves after a century of fighting, warfare, plague, etc. I'm not trying to say the Arab conquests weren't a big deal or anything. They're some of the most impressive and amazing conquests in history. But if they had tried it a 100 years earlier, I can't see them having the same success.
Edited by xipe ()