and the general demands for productivity and being engaged in working forever and ever
don't start no shit it won't be no shit
Nearly anybody who's ever produced great art of ideas of any worth was a loner or a nerd or a shut-in, i'm not sure what great revelations humanity is missing out on because there's less drunken shit-talk in bars.
girdles_gone_wild posted:
Basically, the moment someone is alone in a bar, they pull out their iphone and check facebook or whatever. So what happens is that when their friend or whoever goes to the bathroom or they're waiting to meet someone at the place, they're just locked into these cognitive prisons. A friend and I were at a bar and were just making general observations and noticed that everyone who was by themselves was just locked into their smart phone. It kind of kills the place, so to speak, because then no one ever strikes up a conversation with people in the same establish anymore.
i made the comment on wddp that smart phones are kind of the bane of the bar/club, or whatever, and I was told to stop bro posting lmao
That's why the best clubs have those cellphone jamming cages and also make you check your guns. but the police shut them down once there are 3 or 4 gang related murders in a month or two. at least that's how it is in flint
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
This archaic bullshit about the sanctity of face-to-face conversation is honestly some of the dumbest stuff i've ever heard.
Nearly anybody who's ever produced great art of ideas of any worth was a loner or a nerd or a shut-in, i'm not sure what great revelations humanity is missing out on because there's less drunken shit-talk in bars.
It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
face to face conversations are still really important and probably hold more inexpressible without poetry or synthesizer music feelings and truths, but they definitely don't hold all of the gold coins of human interaction in their leather purses
Myfanwy posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
This archaic bullshit about the sanctity of face-to-face conversation is honestly some of the dumbest stuff i've ever heard.
Nearly anybody who's ever produced great art of ideas of any worth was a loner or a nerd or a shut-in, i'm not sure what great revelations humanity is missing out on because there's less drunken shit-talk in bars.It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
face to face conversations are still really important and probably hold more inexpressible without poetry or synthesizer music feelings and truths, but they definitely don't hold all of the gold coins of human interaction in their leather purses
Plus the internet is way better for serious debate and discussion. Debate in real life is pointless because you can just lie and make stuff up and pull bullshit out of your arse, whereas in text you can do the same thing but link to a variety of flawed and selective sources to add legitimacy to your nonsense.
Myfanwy posted:
It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
Myfanwy posted:
It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
Myfanwy posted:
It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
Myfanwy posted:
It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
Myfanwy posted:
It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:Myfanwy posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
This archaic bullshit about the sanctity of face-to-face conversation is honestly some of the dumbest stuff i've ever heard.
Nearly anybody who's ever produced great art of ideas of any worth was a loner or a nerd or a shut-in, i'm not sure what great revelations humanity is missing out on because there's less drunken shit-talk in bars.It's arguably easier to engage people on a deep level in text. because if you're really charming people get bowled over and can tell you what you want to hear, and if you're awkward they'll stop saying anything. all the gestural stuff is removed online and people can commit as deeply as they'd like to.
face to face conversations are still really important and probably hold more inexpressible without poetry or synthesizer music feelings and truths, but they definitely don't hold all of the gold coins of human interaction in their leather pursesPlus the internet is way better for serious debate and discussion. Debate in real life is pointless because you can just lie and make stuff up and pull bullshit out of your arse, whereas in text you can do the same thing but link to a variety of flawed and selective sources to add legitimacy to your nonsense.
And marxist science has proven that the internet allows schizophrenics to ramble just as incoherently in text as they do in real life. Timecube.com
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
People laugh at this "star-children" stuff but autistic conversation is actually a pretty good development for humanity. We've been trying to transcend our petty emotions and bodies for millenia through God and Nationalism and Tribalism and we finally might be close to rendering those obsolete.
It should be good for the discourse of englightened persons, but the internet is becoming a walled garden and no one will be able to talk to Indians who are easily spotted online by their weird idioms, anywhere online except specialist china military forums and the comments foreign policy.com articles where they address everyone as Mr.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
People laugh at this "star-children" stuff but autistic conversation is actually a pretty good development for humanity. We've been trying to transcend our petty emotions and bodies for millenia through God and Nationalism and Tribalism and we finally might be close to rendering those obsolete.
yeah this pretty accurately describes what happens on tumblr and twitter with people inventing xer own unique genders and orientations and neurostatuses and political ideologies
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
He's right, also the privilege that attractive people get also undermines the effectiveness of conversation irl
somehow my okc where my pic only shows my ripped abs promotes a great deal of discussion and yet society says it would be impolite for me to lift up my shirt to start conversations with people in the meatspace??? talk about double sstandards
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
People laugh at this "star-children" stuff but autistic conversation is actually a pretty good development for humanity. We've been trying to transcend our petty emotions and bodies for millenia through God and Nationalism and Tribalism and we finally might be close to rendering those obsolete.
this, except the opposite -nietzsche
gyrofry posted:i love you swampthing
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
People laugh at this "star-children" stuff but autistic conversation is actually a pretty good development for humanity. We've been trying to transcend our petty emotions and bodies for millenia through God and Nationalism and Tribalism and we finally might be close to rendering those obsolete.
at the very least it might finally be a subjectivity appropriate to dealing with a world fully alienated to standing reserve
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
This archaic bullshit about the sanctity of face-to-face conversation is honestly some of the dumbest stuff i've ever heard.
Nearly anybody who's ever produced great art of ideas of any worth was a loner or a nerd or a shut-in, i'm not sure what great revelations humanity is missing out on because there's less drunken shit-talk in bars.
on the one hand i agree but on the other hand im already an introvert and i dont feel like enabling it further is good for me (probably the real reason i dont own an iphone)
crustpunk_trotsky posted:
somehow my okc where my pic only shows my ripped abs promotes a great deal of discussion and yet society says it would be impolite for me to lift up my shirt to start conversations with people in the meatspace??? talk about double sstandards
same
Transient_Grace posted:
People are utterly boring and I will check my phone/laptop/whatever constantly during conversations. sorrz.
Sounds like you are the boring one, mate.
Later folks.
guidoanselmi posted:
god im so lonely
guidoanselmi posted:
sounds like he's my ex
i wish
Meursault posted:Transient_Grace posted:
People are utterly boring and I will check my phone/laptop/whatever constantly during conversations. sorrz.Sounds like you are the boring one, mate.
If you're bored then you're boring is a good rule of thumb
But boredom is also a sign of clinical depression so watch out!
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
He's right, also the privilege that attractive people get also undermines the effectiveness of conversation irl
don't have me because im beautiful
I thought the shit he was saying was boring.
Myfanwy posted:Meursault posted:Transient_Grace posted:
People are utterly boring and I will check my phone/laptop/whatever constantly during conversations. sorrz.Sounds like you are the boring one, mate.
If you're bored then you're boring is a good rule of thumb
But boredom is also a sign of clinical depression so watch out!
Boredom is also a sign of intelligence. The problem isn't that we are too boring to have anything to talk about, it's just that our present company is incapable of talking about anything interesting. If you want to talk to your friend at length about some gossip regarding somebody I don't know, don't be surprised when the phone comes out.
WillieTomg posted:deadken posted:
question: has the ubiquity of communications technology crippled our potential for mass action? once we were masses; now we have one facebook page (where we tell the world that we 'like' lin biao and althusser), one smartphone, one okcupid profile, we know we are individuals. the communications network is to some extent rhizomatic maybe but it is always a network of molar objects and never of molecularitiesimo its neutered the idea of revolution (and far beyond the conception of revolution as a charge on the barricades) from a social event to a series of brutally hard fought and isolated battles. you're not just fighting state power, you have to first tell someone "yeah you're educated but your entire conception of What Is is totally incorrect" and explaining how That One TED Talk isn't evidence of space mining obviating present day ecology and social justice and shit so you're not just having an exchange of ideas, you're literally having a battle of realities as you both draw upon bodies of information regardless of their merit.
and if you're very lucky and charismatic as shit you'll convince people.
so you can do it again.
and again.
and again.
Until. You fucking. Die.
how the fuck is this different than any other point in history. like you werent going to get a revolution in 1870's germany. for one to have a chance of happening people had to be convinced that a revolution was not only possible but also something desirable. attributing anything of particular import to facebook or smartphones in this context seems very ahistorical.
like if you said "revolution" to some factory worker the immediate result wasnt the grabbing of the pitchforks and the storming of the barricades or whatever just because the person in question wasnt a poor post-fordian facebook subject hopelessly hooked up to his smartphone like all those JERKS you dated in high school. he'd probably still say "fuck you" and then youd have to...... convince him...... that your socialist reality was better than whatever dumb ideas he clung to or whatever.
Edited by Tinkzorg ()
Tinkzorg posted:
socialist reality... whatever dumb ideas he clung to
babyfinland posted:
there's absolutely no reason to be bored because God Is Real
but god's existence is boring, so imma check my prayer beads app