Groulxsmith posted:
a bunch of westerners on a quasi-comedy forum discussing correct methods of revolution for people so foreign to them that they might well be from another planet is a bit absurd, but less so than people who have a career of writing papers defending or attacking patently false concepts like democratic peace theory or creating econometric models to predict behavior
time to come clean, I only read rhizzone to print out the best posts so me and the other execs can have a good laugh before we do rails of coke and murder an immigrant child on our shrine to baphomet & baal
babyfinland posted:gyrofry posted:
ok i must know -- who are the armchair revolutionaries against whom you're constantly passively sniping goldsmythethere are at least three maoist super secret agents who post on this forum and whose cover i have blown by expertly trolling them. you think this is a game? you think this is a M**********ing gaaaaaaame???
Please out them O Cia wonder man
aerdil posted:
he lays out truths too Real for most liberals to digest hence he's merely obscurantist eurotrash
such as the fallacy in traditional marxist privileging of class struggle?
babyfinland posted:aerdil posted:
he lays out truths too Real for most liberals to digest hence he's merely obscurantist eurotrashsuch as the fallacy in traditional marxist privileging of class struggle?
sounds liek a valid h2 to me
tpaine posted:
i musta listened to that like 7 times today. theres something so satisfying about him describing how he feels about the sausage and its taste "your products are very delicious, loved your sausage for 30 years"
gyrofry posted:
maple and sage
wtf bro im not in the minority
aerdil posted:
no but the amazon page has the look inside feature enabled now so u can look at the table of contents + some random pages
littlegreenpills posted:
why am i finding the enigma of capital so impenetrable
on the assumption taht this post does not represent a joke; is it your first substantial encounter with harvey? it seemed pretty straightforward to me but then i watched all the youtubes he did on volume 1
"How are you getting along?" the blind man asked the lame man. "As you see," the lame man replied to the blind man.
mistersix posted:
speaking of jokes, i picked up "jokes and their relation to the unconscious" by freud at half price books because i vaguely remembered critchley having praise for it as especially unique and interesting among freuds body of work, although i cant recall his specific reasons for that. heres a joke, chosen at random, from flipping through the book:
"How are you getting along?" the blind man asked the lame man. "As you see," the lame man replied to the blind man.
That dude sounds fuckin lame
i literally dont know a thing about marxism or postmodernism or anything, really. is there anything salvageable to be found in postcolonialist theory? fanon and spivak and all the rest of it. its been something ive been thinking about researching but thats about as far as ive gotten so far
really im just trying to up my marxist analysis. im still working on capital alongside harvey's lectures, a project which im about 60 pages and 45 minute sinto after a whole month.
also i just read settlers so im really interested in stuff that analyzes white working class folks and their relationship with revolution and power, and what it would mean to do meaningful organizing inside white american communities
fanon is pretty stupid
babyfinland posted:
fanon is pretty stupid
whyzzat
rakauq posted:babyfinland posted:
fanon is pretty stupidwhyzzat
hes really sloppy and lazy theoretically and pertty much just makes stuff up. he was a psychiatrist so i guess thats what hes trained to do but it makes for pretty pisspoor theory. he was like a shock artist basically. woogie boogie white man the niggers gonna getcha!!
that said hes obviously really important and deserves to be read i guess. i dont think theres anything in his work that hasnt pretty much permeated into the general "radical" zeitgeist, and a lot of left and most postcolonial theory is a resposne to fanon to some extent. he's one of those really-wrong-but-canon guys, like freud or whatever.