#41
Post rating: ~
Wow pretty fucked up getfiscal. I'm gonna need a word with your psychiic about this *teleports away forever again*
#42
tardy on these heaters
Post rating: ~
im a Krazy Kommonist

Everybody gimme the money. lets share.
#43
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
how's about communists start working on that whole "from each according to their ability" thing before they come around again for any handouts
#44
Post rating: ~

Crow posted:
you are

#45
Post rating: ~
what was the game they played in the OP, cycloneboy?
#46
Post rating: ~
game theory is a shitty bourgeoise way to talk about the coercive laws of competition 200 years late without mentioning marx or actually saying anything interesting. same with Keynesian which is like a small piece of marxism given religious status by the bourgeoisie. in fact most social science, at least as taught in the west, is just a shitty watered down bourgeois version of something actually interesting and revolutionary.
#47
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
yeah baby huey you're right almost all social scientists are wrong pause not
#48
Post rating: ~
i'm pretty sure anyone who's ever said anything within a liberal framework is wrong, or at least will prove to be wrong 50 years from now when democracy is dead and buried
#49
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
liberalism is the light
#50
Post rating: ~
i dont know man...... liberalism it seems... just a lil dumb just dumb.
#51
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
well liberalism must be joined with socialism
#52
Post rating: ~
even worse. socialism is awful. get outta here with ur cretinous equalizers
#53
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
social-democracy today, socialism eventually, liberalism forever.
#54
Post rating: ~
when has social democracy ever led to socialism
#55
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
it will. just got to give it a few centuries. any day now. any. day. now.
#56
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:
social-democracy today, socialism eventually, liberalism forever.



#57
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
#58
tardy on these heaters
Post rating: ~
#59
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:
it will. just got to give it a few centuries. any day now. any. day. now.


why does it seem like democracy's road to socialism is slowing down even as the speed of the world's cultural/political/whatever production is accelerating?

#60
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~

Impper posted:
why does it seem like democracy's road to socialism is slowing down even as the speed of the world's cultural/political/whatever production is accelerating?

traditional state socialism (including heavy nationalization within social democracies) fails because of problems with centralization and lack of incentives. so there was naturally a period where this limit caused a sloughing off of state socialism. now that the world is regrouping against neoliberalism, there will be a transition towards looser styles of planning, with more democratic associational control. that is, small cooperatives, worker codetermination, more local government, parapublic enterprises, etc. will diversify the economy, along with coordination within sectors that create semi-public-approved/regulated oligopolies.

#61
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:
Impper posted:
why does it seem like democracy's road to socialism is slowing down even as the speed of the world's cultural/political/whatever production is accelerating?
traditional state socialism (including heavy nationalization within social democracies) fails because of problems with centralization and lack of incentives. so there was naturally a period where this limit caused a sloughing off of state socialism. now that the world is regrouping against neoliberalism, there will be a transition towards looser styles of planning, with more democratic associational control. that is, small cooperatives, worker codetermination, more local government, parapublic enterprises, etc. will diversify the economy, along with coordination within sectors that create semi-public-approved/regulated oligopolies.


lol

#62
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~

Crow posted:
lol



Bernstein Was Right

#63
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:

Crow posted:
lol

Bernstein Was Right



b. . .but he wasnt! its a matter of historical fact that he wasnt!

#64
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~

Tsargon posted:
b. . .but he wasnt! its a matter of historical fact that he wasnt!

Your sample size is too small, tsargonboy.

#65
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:

Crow posted:
lol

Bernstein Was Right

In a 1977 Rolling Stone article, Bernstein revealed that over 400 US journalists had been employed by the Central Intelligence Agency, secretly carrying out assignments and publishing news stories for them.

wow! yes he was!

#66
California
Post rating: ~
thinking about trying coke while i listen to one of my itunes
#67
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~

Crow posted:
In a 1977 Rolling Stone article, Bernstein revealed that over 400 US journalists had been employed by the Central Intelligence Agency, secretly carrying out assignments and publishing news stories for them.

wow! yes he was!

what's wrong with working with the government of the US, which was defending the world from tyranny.

#68
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:

Crow posted:
In a 1977 Rolling Stone article, Bernstein revealed that over 400 US journalists had been employed by the Central Intelligence Agency, secretly carrying out assignments and publishing news stories for them.

wow! yes he was!

what's wrong with working with the government of the US, which was defending the world from tyranny.

i didnt say there was anything wrong with it?? looks like youre projecting your secret radical desire unto me again. Wow

#69
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
i'm projecting a rainbow from my carebear tummy towards socialism, which i will heal for the 22nd century
#70
tardy on these heaters
Post rating: ~

Crow posted:

getfiscal posted:

Crow posted:
lol

Bernstein Was Right

In a 1977 Rolling Stone article, Bernstein revealed that over 400 US journalists had been employed by the Central Intelligence Agency, secretly carrying out assignments and publishing news stories for them.

wow! yes he was!



lol Wa' a Po-faced loser.

#71
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:

Impper posted:
why does it seem like democracy's road to socialism is slowing down even as the speed of the world's cultural/political/whatever production is accelerating?

traditional state socialism (including heavy nationalization within social democracies) fails because of problems with centralization and lack of incentives. so there was naturally a period where this limit caused a sloughing off of state socialism. now that the world is regrouping against neoliberalism, there will be a transition towards looser styles of planning, with more democratic associational control. that is, small cooperatives, worker codetermination, more local government, parapublic enterprises, etc. will diversify the economy, along with coordination within sectors that create semi-public-approved/regulated oligopolies.



negri_and_hardt_are_pathetic.txt