animedad posted:
the attractive person can have control over his/her corner of the sexual market and the unattractive nerd can hustle the objective markets and get paper. where's the problem?
attractive rich people.
the sexual capitalist class, if you will.
getfiscal posted:
almost invariably someone that criticizes "capitalism" is admitting they aren't really good at their job.
im probably the worlds greatest night clerk
everything else is burger-flipping.
Greed is right.
Greed works.
Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.
Greed, in all of its forms -- greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge -- has marked the upward surge of mankind.
And greed -- you mark my words -- will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA.
germanjoey posted:
some day you'll find yourself a Boyfriend Free Girl, tapespeed...
a "BFG," if you will
getfiscal posted:
who cares if your wife is banging some beanpole nba star on the side. maybe grow a pair and not try to set up machine gun positions around your wife's vagina. it's not like she runs out of vagina. it'll probably be safe for that one time a month you peel yourself away from bad television and demand to rub vigorously against your lady.
JAred Diamond aka best person ever writes about this in his awesome book The Third Chimpanzee,
i know lf is all "ruh ruh libtard evopsych ruh ruh" but from an anthropological point of view humans seem to behave exactly as you would expect an animal with its sexual characteristics to behave, that is, a largely monogamous mammal with a tendency for the occasional adultery, in fact, most monogamous animals are adulterous when its advantageous, that is sometimes when a female is paired with a male that is a sufficient provider but lacks the proper genetic material (i.e isn't sexually attractive enough) she will mate with a better male, and obviously for males it is beneficial to try to impregnate as many females as possible as long as you got some other male feeding them for you.
tldr; adultery is ok if you don't get caught.
SomeIsraeliFuck posted:getfiscal posted:
who cares if your wife is banging some beanpole nba star on the side. maybe grow a pair and not try to set up machine gun positions around your wife's vagina. it's not like she runs out of vagina. it'll probably be safe for that one time a month you peel yourself away from bad television and demand to rub vigorously against your lady.tldr; adultery is ok if you don't get caught.
typical jew...
yase.
well i know i took a damn shower this morning i donno about you monkey freaks
Do not allow yourself to be tempted into adultery.
do morals exist in vacuum? yhwh allows married men to fuck women in other cities as long his wife and neighbors don't find out about it.
getfiscal posted:
my belief is that man is no better than a manimal
so cannibalism is cool with you
SomeIsraeliFuck posted:
meat is murder imo
thats irrational. the animals arent gonna take their revenge on you. You're having Beliefs
babyfinland posted:
thats irrational. the animals arent gonna take their revenge on you. You're having Beliefs
PAradox detected
Atheist will self destruct in 10... 9..etc
babyfinland posted:
arabs' political allegiances are based primarily on whether the regime in power tortured their cousin or gave him a state job.
same but canadians.
germanjoey posted:
some day you'll find yourself a Boyfriend Free Girl, tapespeed...
don't compare me to chrischan plx
SomeIsraeliFuck posted:
JAred Diamond aka best person ever writes about this in his awesome book The Third Chimpanzee,
i know lf is all "ruh ruh libtard evopsych ruh ruh" but from an anthropological point of view humans seem to behave exactly as you would expect an animal with its sexual characteristics to behave, that is, a largely monogamous mammal with a tendency for the occasional adultery, in fact, most monogamous animals are adulterous when its advantageous, that is sometimes when a female is paired with a male that is a sufficient provider but lacks the proper genetic material (i.e isn't sexually attractive enough) she will mate with a better male, and obviously for males it is beneficial to try to impregnate as many females as possible as long as you got some other male feeding them for you.
doesn't it say somewhere like "men have useless attacker sperm and 2 minute orgasms while females have 10 minute ones therefore group gangbang = default human tribal fucking"
because i read that stunned like, two worlds understanding of the world, based on his hilariously incorrect/biased observations but totally obviously out of sync with actual things humankind would ever do
SomeIsraeliFuck posted:
justifying? it's a risky decision, the benefits are obvious but so are the downsides.
do morals exist in vacuum? yhwh allows married men to fuck women in other cities as long his wife and neighbors don't find out about it.
morality exists beyond 'sky wizard lmao'
tearing down traditional sexual mores and replacing it with 'do whatever is consensual i guess' is destructive/destabilizing while capitalism remains (it subverted popular feminism from bra burning to showing doug stanhope where babies feed within a generation, etc)
tapespeed posted:
morality exists beyond 'sky wizard lmao'
look at dis noob
Cycloneboy posted:
the problem with "biotruths" regarding human sexuality is that they fail to take into account the fact that sex isn't solely about reproduction. SORRY TO RUIN YOUR DAY.
thats literally irrelevant to the entire universe
discipline posted:
this is like a bunch of blind people discussing stained glass windows
according to the Online Virgin Community, lack of experience and knowledge about a particular issue makes you a more perfect observer of it
tapespeed posted:
doesn't it say somewhere like "men have useless attacker sperm and 2 minute orgasms while females have 10 minute ones therefore group gangbang = default human tribal fucking"
because i read that stunned like, two worlds understanding of the world, based on his hilariously incorrect/biased observations but totally obviously out of sync with actual things humankind would ever do
i doubt it
you might be confusing people with bonobo chimps who are discussed in length in the book but have very different mating rituals, including gang bangs.
jared is best human
karl popper no. 2
babyfinland posted:Cycloneboy posted:
the problem with "biotruths" regarding human sexuality is that they fail to take into account the fact that sex isn't solely about reproduction. SORRY TO RUIN YOUR DAY.thats literally irrelevant to the entire universe
i'd like you to clarify your position a little. i don't see how the purpose of sex does not change how we can expect humans to engage in sex.
Cycloneboy posted:babyfinland posted:Cycloneboy posted:
the problem with "biotruths" regarding human sexuality is that they fail to take into account the fact that sex isn't solely about reproduction. SORRY TO RUIN YOUR DAY.thats literally irrelevant to the entire universe
i'd like you to clarify your position a little. i don't see how the purpose of sex does not change how we can expect humans to engage in sex.
sex is not a purposeful tool like that, thats such a psychotic perspective on human relations
you are retarded and you need to climb down a little bit on the humility ladder there honeychild
Cycloneboy posted:
i'd like you to clarify your position a little. i don't see how the purpose of sex does not change how we can expect humans to engage in sex.
the standard 'lol biotruthers, don't you know humans evolved past their original caveman biological functions' retort is dumb as all heck.
socialists with your nonsense, humans are not divorced from their biology, nearly every facet of our mental existence is defined by the limitations of our bodies.
Cycloneboy posted:
for example, oftentimes, when trying to get a male bull to ejaculate so that they can get sperm for artificial insemination, they find it does not react to a female cow, so they bring in a young steer. a lot of the time, it will then ejaculate. EXPLAIN THAT, JARED DIAMOND.
Wow A Gay Cow
SomeIsraeliFuck posted:Cycloneboy posted:
i'd like you to clarify your position a little. i don't see how the purpose of sex does not change how we can expect humans to engage in sex.the standard 'lol biotruthers, don't you know humans evolved past their original caveman biological functions' retort is dumb as all heck.
socialists with your nonsense, humans are not divorced from their biology, nearly every facet of our mental existence is defined by the limitations of our bodies.
morality doesnt exist until they want it to and then all of a sudden normal people are a bunch of backwards reactionaries or whatever and the only Good People in the world are a bunch of perverts with three volumes of marx inside their rectum
getfiscal posted:
The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed -- for lack of a better word -- is good.
Greed is right.
Greed works.
Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.
Greed, in all of its forms -- greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge -- has marked the upward surge of mankind.
And greed -- you mark my words -- will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA.
aGreed