#281

gyrofry posted:
has anyone ever attempted to fuse marx and kierkegaard with the absurdity of revolution as the contemporary leap of faith



camus in the rebel, but camus rejected a revolution which claims the authority to kill,

#282
what a trot
#283

gyrofry posted:
Let us not waste our time in idle discourse! Let us do something, while we have the chance! It is not every day that we are needed….But at this place, at this moment of time, all mankind is us, whether we like it or not. Let us make the most of it, before it is too late!



cool idea. you should do it.

#284
irony is a dead scene
#285

gyrofry posted:
has anyone ever attempted to fuse marx and kierkegaard with the absurdity of revolution as the contemporary leap of faith

front. page.

#286
Abraham seizes and destroys state power knowing the entire time against hope that it will be returned to him.
#287
oh i guess klackloy already did it

Why not, then, shamelessly and courageously ENDORSE the boring standard reproach according to which, Marxism is a "secularized religion," with Lenin as the Messiah, etc.? Yes, assuming the proletarian standpoint IS EXACTLY like making a leap of faith and assuming a full subjective engagement for its Cause; yes, the "truth" of Marxism is perceptible only to those who accomplish this leap, NOT to any neutral observers. What the EXTERNALITY means here is that this truth is nonetheless UNIVERSAL, not just the "point-of-view" of a particular historical subject: "external" intellectuals are needed because the working class cannot immediately perceive ITS OWN PLACE within the social totality which enables it to accomplish its "mission" - this insight has to be mediated through an external element.



http://www.lacan.com/replenin.htm

Edited by gyrofry ()

#288

NounsareVerbs posted:

gyrofry posted:
has anyone ever attempted to fuse marx and kierkegaard with the absurdity of revolution as the contemporary leap of faith

camus in the rebel, but camus rejected a revolution which claims the authority to kill,


haha camus was a piece of shit. also sartre

#289

gyrofry posted:
oh i guess klackloy already did it

Why not, then, shamelessly and courageously ENDORSE the boring standard reproach according to which, Marxism is a "secularized religion," with Lenin as the Messiah, etc.? Yes, assuming the proletarian standpoint IS EXACTLY like making a leap of faith and assuming a full subjective engagement for its Cause; yes, the "truth" of Marxism is perceptible only to those who accomplish this leap, NOT to any neutral observers. What the EXTERNALITY means here is that this truth is nonetheless UNIVERSAL, not just the "point-of-view" of a particular historical subject: "external" intellectuals are needed because the working class cannot immediately perceive ITS OWN PLACE within the social totality which enables it to accomplish its "mission" - this insight has to be mediated through an external element.



http://www.lacan.com/replenin.htm



The Ironic Pope of Marxism

#290

gyrofry posted:
oh i guess klackloy already did it

Why not, then, shamelessly and courageously ENDORSE the boring standard reproach according to which, Marxism is a "secularized religion," with Lenin as the Messiah, etc.? Yes, assuming the proletarian standpoint IS EXACTLY like making a leap of faith and assuming a full subjective engagement for its Cause; yes, the "truth" of Marxism is perceptible only to those who accomplish this leap, NOT to any neutral observers. What the EXTERNALITY means here is that this truth is nonetheless UNIVERSAL, not just the "point-of-view" of a particular historical subject: "external" intellectuals are needed because the working class cannot immediately perceive ITS OWN PLACE within the social totality which enables it to accomplish its "mission" - this insight has to be mediated through an external element.



http://www.lacan.com/replenin.htm

once of his schticks last year was about how we find it easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism, which i guess is related

#291

gyrofry posted:
has anyone ever attempted to fuse marx and kierkegaard with the absurdity of revolution as the contemporary leap of faith


milton

#292
James Randi
#293
i remember as a faggot high shcooler i loved camus and then i read the thing where hes like 'FRENCH ALGERIANS DESERVE ALGERIA TOO' and i was like oh turns out hes a fucking jerk idiot jerk imperialist dick
#294

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:
i remember as a faggot high shcooler i loved camus and then i read the thing where hes like 'FRENCH ALGERIANS DESERVE ALGERIA TOO' and i was like oh turns out hes a fucking jerk idiot jerk imperialist dick

same.

#295
haha i knew existentialism was a crock of shit even in high school. blow me
#296
[account deactivated]
#297
pieds noirs. a million and one of the cretins. rhodesia for the rhodes. israel for the jews. eurabia for the eurabs. im an unironic colonialist beat that LF
#298

discipline posted:
I'm the stranger.... killing an arab

Yeah, with your breath!!!













#299
fascism just happens man, like la peste so it goes
#300

GoldenLionTamarin posted:
haha i knew existentialism was a crock of shit even in high school. blow me



and look at you now - one of the biggest doo doo heads ever. you're not even a person you just vaguely resemble one lol

#301

GoldenLionTamarin posted:
haha i knew existentialism was a crock of shit even in high school. blow me


RIP little nihilist monkey

#302
I think fascism is good, as well as imperialism, and I like when these things happen
#303
hyperdrive
#304

Meursault posted:
I think fascism is good, as well as imperialism, and I like when these things happen

Nooooooo!

#305

Groulxsmith posted:

GoldenLionTamarin posted:
haha i knew existentialism was a crock of shit even in high school. blow me

RIP little nihilist monkey


im not a nihilist. im a christian

#306

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:
i remember as a faggot high shcooler i loved camus and then i read the thing where hes like 'FRENCH ALGERIANS DESERVE ALGERIA TOO' and i was like oh turns out hes a fucking jerk idiot jerk imperialist dick



I don’t know if they “deserve” it but I wouldn’t be so quick to belittle blackfoot’s love of their homeland. I mean do you “deserve” to live in your settler country? And if you don’t, are you happy to go back to England or Poland or whatever third world country your ancestors came from?

#307
my ancestors came from proud alsace so yeah i'd go back
#308
the settler-settled relationship is an incomplete analysis we dwell on too much. the french originally conquered and settled canada but for the last ~250 years have been the negres blancs d'amerique
#309

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:
my ancestors came from proud alsace so yeah i'd go back



Hmmm, i'm skeptical. I sure as fuck ain't going back to Essex. I was born on this soil!

#310

Groulxsmith posted:
the settler-settled relationship is an incomplete analysis we dwell on too much. the french originally conquered and settled canada but for the last ~250 years have been the negres blancs d'amerique


gonna have to agree wit h this. every society ever is a conqueror, ya know. even the settled were/are settlers,. , deal with it

#311

Ironicwarcriminal posted:
Hmmm, i'm skeptical. I sure as fuck ain't going back to Essex. I was born on this soil!



yeah and it's already been established that you are aussie scum. strasbourg owns i'd move there in a minute.

#312
actually i wouldnt mind going back to ireland
#313
ireland, otoh, is a shithole
#314
are we picking the ethnic heritage we most like or are none of you mongrels
#315
real talk im 100% german/germanic alsatian. everyone else, even if they are one ethnicity, is obviously a mongrel
#316
i dont have my full geneaology but i got all my familys records together and went on ancestry.com and all signs point to england. my last name is irish though. i dont know. i wish there were better records so i could learn this stuff
#317

Groulxsmith posted:
are we picking the ethnic heritage we most like or are none of you mongrels



English, Irish, Scottish, so wherever it is it’s going to be miserable shithole, leave me hear in Judea and Samaria thanks.

#318
yeah. mongrels. 100% pure ashkenazim german jew or subhuman
#319
So the real question is: How can we condemn Jewish settlers? What separates them from us apart from time and legal fictions drawn up to consolidate our genocides? Why should Israel possibly listen to the hypocritical bleatings of “Americans” or “Canadians” or “Australians” or whatever disgusting group of Eurotrash colonized the new world?
#320
timeframe