#18601
Post rating: +
zak "struggling to" cope
#18602
Post rating: +
the thing i dont understand about these complete u-turns is that is he disavowing the labour theory of value and its implications? the nature of the sale of labour power as a commodity and the implications therein? because any rube can draw the card that says "capitalism has resulted in a bumper yield of use-values" and unleash a grey-water geyser of 1776 Smith against the corn laws.

his style comes across as tawdry jeremiad, and perhaps its the slugs of hegel i've been drinking but there's no reason in his disavowal, its emotive confessional excoriation; where the fetters of personal reaction to individual events corrode ones ability to comprehend the messy complexity of the capitalism arc in toto. discard emotion, put politics in command

good luck sleeping in your procrustean bed, cope-man
#18603
Post rating: +
anyway, i read Owen Smith's New View of sOciety; th short pamphlet "on the medieval origins of the modern state" (Strayer) and am now reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles
#18604
Post rating: ~

lo posted:

drwhat posted:


no, unfortunately pro wrestlers are quite bad at writing memoirs



Bret Hart's memoir is actually very good because he's so self-serious that he's convinced he is creating an actual historical document.

But then he turns around and starts lying about how awful it was for him to be constantly cheating on his wife with waitresses

#18605
UNUSUALY COOL
Post rating: +
yet when I say it was awful for bret hart to be constantly cheating on his wife with waitresses, im telling the truth.. this world is so corrupt…..
#18606
Post rating: ~
hoisting myself up by my own petard on the thousand jew hill, overlooking 100,000 palestinian bodies, I said to myself, "You are the smart guy mister"
#18607
Post rating: ~

Constantignoble posted:

Constantignoble posted:

Just finished reading Colin Drumm's dissertation, "The Difference That Money Makes"...

Update: After chewing on this for a couple of months, I think I've gestated some responses to Drumm. I no longer believe that his chapter critiquing Marx succeeds, though the rest of the book is still plenty interesting, and I give points for at least making one of the more unique attacks I've seen.

If anyone else here has read chapter 1, let me know. I'm eager to discuss the specifics, but whereas the audience here is fairly sympathetic to my position from the outset, I'd prefer that folks look it over independently; when I attempt to express the arguments alongside arguing against them, I've found the feedback has been a bit less muscular than I've hoped. It's probably just not a good way to absorb an argument, to see it summarized and then immediately attacked.



put it up and i'll give it a whirl!

#18608
Post rating: +
The full book is linked in the quote. My response needs a bit of tidying; I'll attempt to do so over the weekend.
#18609
mt.real
Post rating: +
i've been reading V. I. Lenin's "The State and Revolution". you guys heard of this guy? not bad
#18610
lies half the time
Post rating: ~
what's it about
#18611
Post rating: +
wokenness, an archaic form of wokeness
#18612
Post rating: +
having read lots of robert owen now reading anti-duhring. really wish more communists pick up frickin a book every now and again

#18613
Post rating: +
i've been reading a bit about rwanda and the congo recently, and it turns out that rwanda under the rpf is essentially an entire state run along the lines of every western counterinsurgenccy strategy that's ever been devised. they saw the phoenix program and were like 'damn let's always fight wars like this', it's really insane and is making me think about parallels with more familiar countries..