therefore, the premise of the thread. QED
Synergy posted:it will be interesting to see if a mass shift towards electoralism happens on the far left.
would be interesting to see if anyone would even notice
Synergy posted:with the PSL Bernie article and lesser evilism being re-examined among socialists/communists it will be interesting to see if a mass shift towards electoralism happens on the far left.
Edited by swampman ()
Populares posted:the loudest and the dumbest shall continue to lead uncontested.
sudden realization that i've been the president this whole time
aerdil posted:from the one day i was bored and decided to troll the bernie thread on sa:
Flying_horse_in_saudi_arabia posted:gas
MarxUltor posted:On the day the Governor of Florida declared that the professional wrestling company owned by Trumps secretary of the Small Business Administration was essential and exempt from state lockdowns, trump directly accused one of the two interstate compacts recently signed to deny presidential authority over businesses and public health as being a precursor to independence
everything's coming up milhouse
drwhat posted:MarxUltor posted:On the day the Governor of Florida declared that the professional wrestling company owned by Trumps secretary of the Small Business Administration was essential and exempt from state lockdowns, trump directly accused one of the two interstate compacts recently signed to deny presidential authority over businesses and public health as being a precursor to independence
everything's coming up milhouse
I thought this was funny because "Joe Biden Will Lead a Government" sounds like a phrase the CIA would come up with when throwing its support behind "informal mechanisms" to restore good ol' fashioned middle-class security and stability after a "legitimacy deficit," ala Gen. Sisi in Egypt. Biden can also dress the part with a pair of aviator sunglasses. The phrasing "liberal autocracies" has come up a bit too in the liberal-military-intelligence / institutional blob media as a way to counter what they deem as "illiberal democracies."
From that PSL article posted here:
Since Trump became a phenomena in the 2016 election, which was mainly the result of virtually undiluted, free and constant media time given to him by CNN, CBS, and the capitalist-owned media outlets in the United States (all pursuing a narrow agenda connected to their ratings and advertising money) the Party for Socialism and Liberation has explained that significant sectors of the U.S. ruling class would be profoundly dissatisfied with Trump as the CEO of the government that serves their interests.
Trump is not trusted by the bourgeoisie to be the top executive to manage their common affairs. He neither has the inclination, training or temperament for the task at hand. In fact, his absolute narcissism, hustling and dictatorial style makes him a destabilizing factor for imperialism and the institutions of the U.S.-dominated world order that they have carefully managed for decades. That’s their main beef with Trump.
As early as February 2016 we reminded people of Karl Marx’s incisive generalization in the Communist Manifesto: “The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.” Trump is a destabilizing factor at a time when the big bourgeoisie craves not just profits but stability and are facing, in the words of the Pentagon’s National Security Strategy, an emerging era of “great power competition.”
The ‘steady state’
Trump temporarily overcame the big bourgeoisie’s hostility to him, for a few days, with the bombing of Syria in April 2017. He purchased wider ruling-class appreciation with the gargantuan tax giveaway to the banks, corporations and already wealthy. Grateful as the capitalists are for this redistribution of wealth to the already rich, they are still skeptical of him. It is mainly in coal, oil, steel, aluminum and the weapons industries that Trump retains solid support from some sectors of the capitalists. He also has considerable support in the white middle class and considerable sectors of white workers.
But the author of the New York Times editorial represents the professional class of managers of the permanent state apparatus and they revile Trump. In describing their quiet — and now open — subversion against Trump the author aptly describes who they are and what their mission is in the framework of the capitalist ruling class and its global empire: “This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.”
It’s critically important for socialists who are organizing against Trump’s egregious and reactionary policies not to become the tail to the “steady state,” which at its core is the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, FBI and other instruments of repression. That is the state apparatus of the capitalists and their overt and covert instruments of global domination.
https://www.liberationnews.org/socialist-orientation-splits-trump-administration-capitalist-class/
Edited by trakfactri ()
cars posted:Biden, his government led
biden and kamala at milwaukee. biden and kamala in the white house!
*quickly skips to next point as hands start to raise*
"We must face facts. The only sure way to confront the single greatest threat to American security in the 21st century, Chinese imperialism, is to rebuild the U.S. economy and to build up the American worker," writes @HawleyMO. https://t.co/hn9LpllW6n
— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) May 5, 2020
toyot posted:who cares
toyot posted:except on false credentials