toyotathon posted:land, climate change, end of earthly life, south american revolutions? or literally anything
What kind of politics do the people in the reading circle practice
Chthonic_Goat_666 posted:we should just read moby dick or something. can't be thinking about politics 24/7
I agree. Anyway toyote you should start with ECOLOGY OF DEVASTATION: INDOCHINA by John Lewallen
Petrol posted:is moby dick good? i never read it because the premise sounds fucking dumb as hell
it's fine but it's also like everything else considered a classic of English-language literature from that era, they felt they had just then invented symbolism in fiction so when symbolism shows up it's like when CGI shows up in a Hollywood movie from 1993-2003, it goes on forever and they need to make sure you understand that it's there and it's blowing your mind
Chthonic_Goat_666 posted:we should just read moby dick or something. can't be thinking about politics 24/7
Can't go cold turkey
swampman posted:Chthonic_Goat_666 posted:we should just read moby dick or something. can't be thinking about politics 24/7
I agree. Anyway toyote you should start with ECOLOGY OF DEVASTATION: INDOCHINA by John Lewallen
i have this book
Petrol posted:is moby dick good? i never read it because the premise sounds fucking dumb as hell
moby dick absolutely rules and more than half of it is just whaling facts and digressions with no plot happening
cars posted:Petrol posted:is moby dick good? i never read it because the premise sounds fucking dumb as hell
it's fine but it's also like everything else considered a classic of English-language literature from that era, they felt they had just then invented symbolism in fiction so when symbolism shows up it's like when CGI shows up in a Hollywood movie from 1993-2003, it goes on forever and they need to make sure you understand that it's there and it's blowing your mind
so it's the lawnmower man of books. got it
JohnBeige posted:in honor of their passing.
fuk
Petrol posted:is moby dick good? i never read it because the premise sounds fucking dumb as hell
consider that it has all the surface elements of a book that should have fallen out of fashion in English departments long ago:
- a style that no one writes in anymore, and (unlike someone like Hemingway or Twain) is pretty difficult to trace any contemporary writer's style back to
- an approach to race that can be described, at best, as "Kipling-esque" and no women characters of note
- as noted by other posters, features many long digressions from the plot, including lengthy descriptions of whale butchering and an argument that whales are actually fish
and yet it sticks around, for all its faults, because it's an electrifying work that's absolutely worth the time and effort to read it
shapes posted:Petrol posted:is moby dick good? i never read it because the premise sounds fucking dumb as hell
consider that it has all the surface elements of a book that should have fallen out of fashion in English departments long ago:
- a style that no one writes in anymore, and (unlike someone like Hemingway or Twain) is pretty difficult to trace any contemporary writer's style back to
- an approach to race that can be described, at best, as "Kipling-esque" and no women characters of note
- as noted by other posters, features many long digressions from the plot, including lengthy descriptions of whale butchering and an argument that whales are actually fish
and yet it sticks around, for all its faults, because it's an electrifying work that's absolutely worth the time and effort to read it
so it's the lawnmower man of books. got it
Petrol posted:is moby dick good?
7.4 on imdb
animedad posted:how about something commie that is difficult and takes some outside context and is important to zhe verrkers
agatha christie