Caesura109 posted:was watching arrested development reruns a few days ago and was doing that subconcious thing of wondering which actors are likely creeps. jeffrey tambor plays his character pretty well, so i ended up being like 'he is at that age where he's probably built some creep habits by now', lo and behold
Have you never watched the Larry Sanders Show?????
Meursault posted:Caesura109 posted:was watching arrested development reruns a few days ago and was doing that subconcious thing of wondering which actors are likely creeps. jeffrey tambor plays his character pretty well, so i ended up being like 'he is at that age where he's probably built some creep habits by now', lo and behold
Have you never watched the Larry Sanders Show?????
Hey now!!
Petrol posted:on the contrary, if they claimed those things while writing that kind of stuff it would make it far more suspicious imo
the fact that people impute those things onto them today when they dont appear to have moved ideologically beyond nazbol since that time does make it suspicious imo
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:Taibbis apology was very good and I'm having trouble with the idea that we should drag one of the most important writers of our generation for writing shitty stuff 20 years ago even when they apologize. There's a reason why guys like O'Reilly, Trump and Weinstein chose the tactic of "deny everything, smear the victim, threaten to sue." its not just that they're bad people. It's that it works. It worked for decades. If we can't accept real contrition then we're saying that the first tactic is the only one that works, and that's going to impel more to try it. Like yeah, fuck Weinstein and his fake sex therapy but the President got where he is by never apologizing and the right is happy to elect an unrepentant child molester to the senate because it helps their aims
imho the Condemn This Sex Criminal Who You'll Never Meet Game is exhausting and, tbh, pretty narcissistic, so i really didn't intend to prosecute the case. just think the satire defense (which taibbi's apology also relies on) is almost insultingly transparent & am pretty surprised more people here don't feel the same way. but, you know, whatever!
lo posted:whats nazbol about their current stuff?
that's just c_man stringing random phrases together, he's a chatbot
thirdplace posted:
Can you post the full version of this gif where, at first, Seinfeld is laughing at Bill Cosby stand up for six months
drwhat posted:he's a chatbot
we all are
swampman posted:Can you post the full version of this gif where, at first, Seinfeld is laughing at Bill Cosby stand up for six months
no because that particular Cosby set involves fucking a dozen prostitutes and then mocking them in a newspaper you own, and it is rude to post pornography on the rhizzone
Fogle pleaded guilty in 2015 to two criminal charges against him – conspiracy to distribute/receive child pornography and distribution/receipt of child pornography, and traveling and attempting to travel in interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor. Fogle, who was then represented by counsel, was sentenced to 188 months in prison. He appealed, arguing his above-guidelines sentence was improper, but the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed his sentence in June 2016.
Fogle then filed a pro se motion to correct error, relying on a document filed with the court in which Frank Edwin Pate, an inmate in the same prison where Fogle is being detained, argued the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Fogle. Specifically, Pate wrote, “whether a judicial judgment is lawful depends on whether the sovereign has authority to render it.”
Judge Tanya Walton Pratt struck down the contention that she lacked subject matter jurisdiction in a succinct two-page order on Wednesday.
“If Fogle is now claiming to be ‘sovereign,’ the Seventh Circuit has rejected theories of individual sovereignty, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk,” Pratt wrote. “The Seventh Circuit has instructed that these theories should be rejected summarily, however they are presented.”
“Regardless of his theory, Fogle’s challenge of this Court’s jurisdiction is rejected and his Motion to Correct Clear Error Pursuant to Rule 52(b) … is denied,” she said.
stegosaurus posted:when settler law respects your ancestors land claims and testimony for four centuries regardless of their apparent absurdity but then you go to prison
tfw
women hold up half the sky and hold the other half with their fucking feet
you know even leftist men like ole sammy kriss/mark ames can be horrendous to women in person and fictionally and still be leftists!
fucking sick and tired of sexism not being view an endemic issue by leftist men, who will still consume porn and think its ok to choke their girlfriends during sex with 0 attempts of asking if its ok
Petrol posted:speaking of which, have we discussed matt taibbi and mark ames yet? https://jezebel.com/writers-matt-taibbi-and-mark-ames-serviced-no-one-but-t-1820007051
Ames also had a column called “Whore-R stories,” in which he claims he slept with sex workers and wrote about his experiences, presented as non-fictional accounts. The column was sometimes accompanied by photos of the women, details about their bodies, their performances, and their personalities. (The column is a favorite among some Men’s Rights Activists NSFW).
i don't know if anybody actually checked out the Men’s Rights Activists link but in addition to the sex worker pics, ames appears to be doing the deed in one of them so unless everything is staged (like with the women being fully aware of the satire) it's pretty hard to justify
Synergy posted:Petrol posted:speaking of which, have we discussed matt taibbi and mark ames yet? https://jezebel.com/writers-matt-taibbi-and-mark-ames-serviced-no-one-but-t-1820007051
Ames also had a column called “Whore-R stories,” in which he claims he slept with sex workers and wrote about his experiences, presented as non-fictional accounts. The column was sometimes accompanied by photos of the women, details about their bodies, their performances, and their personalities. (The column is a favorite among some Men’s Rights Activists NSFW).
i don't know if anybody actually checked out the Men’s Rights Activists link but in addition to the sex worker pics, ames appears to be doing the deed in one of them so unless everything is staged (like with the women being fully aware of the satire) it's pretty hard to justify
What this? http://exile.ru/transient/162/whore1.jpg
He's fully clothed...
Synergy posted:Petrol posted:speaking of which, have we discussed matt taibbi and mark ames yet? https://jezebel.com/writers-matt-taibbi-and-mark-ames-serviced-no-one-but-t-1820007051
Ames also had a column called “Whore-R stories,” in which he claims he slept with sex workers and wrote about his experiences, presented as non-fictional accounts. The column was sometimes accompanied by photos of the women, details about their bodies, their performances, and their personalities. (The column is a favorite among some Men’s Rights Activists NSFW).
i don't know if anybody actually checked out the Men’s Rights Activists link but in addition to the sex worker pics, ames appears to be doing the deed in one of them so unless everything is staged (like with the women being fully aware of the satire) it's pretty hard to justify
what. Barf
ames just seems like such a medium-intelligence doofus on his podcast, it seemed entirely believable to me that he was really into writing a bunch of dumb violent shit and then irl being way too ineffectual to actually put anything similar into practice
http://www.brooklynvegan.com/jamie-kilstein-rebrands-as-ex-male-feminist/
The Harvey Weinsteins and Louis C.K.’s of the world have been cast out, but many famous men who stand accused of abusing black women still roam free.