#1
Post rating: ~
i really subscribe to mlm except for its seemingly ultraleftist stances on actually exissting socialism which seems to be the same as all armchair revolutionaries that they were nationalist-bourgeois and nothing else and im not really sure if im ready to subscribe to this. and even though they deny three worlds theory as dengist revisionism theyre ready to try to back some aspects of chinese foreign policy like in ethiopia and Afghanistan (hailing the maoist splintrr faction that the chinese most probably did not arm but im lacking sources). im just confused. cant i be a maoist yet hail the achievements of AES over capitalist bloc since the consensus seems that social-imperialism was as bad or maybe even worse than actual imperialism. sry im just rambling. thoughts on the matter?
#2
Post rating: ~

troolari posted:

thoughts on the matter?


loads

#3
Post rating: ~

tears posted:

troolari posted:
thoughts on the matter?


loads


ily

edit: i should add that we have a handful of hoxhaist persons here in finland and theyre probably worse. i kinda understand calling them dogmato-revisionists but my calls for left unity might be blinding me a bit. im all for anti-revisionism but i also know that the primary contradiction has never been with cccp or russia or china. even bourgeois statistics clearly paint this picture with military expenditure ti gdp and exported capital etc.

Edited by GroverBabyFurr ()

#4
Post rating: +
defend aes
#5
Post rating: ~
i guess these upvotes for belgend are the answer for all my ailments. uphold dengist-gorbachevist thought
#6
Kurdt
Post rating: +
i suggest thinking dialectically
#7
Black Belt
Post rating: ~
Mao argued Deng was a capitalist-roader and a revisionist, but that it didnt make him not a socialist. seems like a reasonable framework. Wish he applied it to Khrushchev but
#8
Post rating: +
Mao repeatedly warned that if capitalist-roaders took power they would implement the restoration of capitalism. that he considered deng in a seperate category to the soviet leadership is likely only because mao wasn't actually alive for him taking power.