kamelred posted:
all of this is dumb. being right isn't genetic and people are often wrong before they're right, and when they stop being wrong they should be encouraged to be right from that point on
it's a good way to end up tailing the masses is pretty much the problem with that.
cars posted:i think that'd be fine yeah. but what i'm responding to here is the idea that because people were wrong in the past they should be written off in the future when they're taking serious steps not to make or promote the same mistakes in the future.
it's a good way to end up tailing the masses is pretty much the problem with that.
her own explicitly stated account carefully ducks the words "wrong", "dumb", and "bad", (incidentally this is maybe the sort of pat, abrasive shit that might disqualify someone from whining about how we regard and respond to the shortcomings of various comrades) etc. and shifts blame outwards to a vaguely defined group of Deceivers. whats serious about this? in fact she didn't even say "i was tricked" by way of apologizing, but rather--insanely!--as a rhetorical tactic used to establish credibility. like "well they had me fooled for a while, but now i Get It. i was like you were, but today i have a much hotter take."
something other than the date should probably change before we regard this as anything other than nothing, right? because its not like it gets any easier. the people responsible for such perfidy aren't going to get any worse at doing it, the circumstances that make the interventionist game so appealing in times of crisis aren't going to subside. i don't think the intellectual task of someone in her position--or ours--is to develop ever better sources, to get ever closer to reality, to be ever more rational, more skeptical, more clear-headed, but rather to develop an understanding of our own culpability, complacency, and responsibility as a class and to incorporate that understanding into our strategy at the level of organizing. khalek doesn't have to self-immolate or something but without the crucial insight that our thinking results from our circumstances and not our access to Better Facts, getting it right on imperialism by a resolving to be a better journalist is a seriously losing bet. its just a very, very difficult thing to do. no one is going to be mad if she does but there's no downside to assuming she wont either so i return my original question: who cares?
In other instances, curators would inject a story—even if it wasn’t being widely discussed on Facebook—because it was deemed important for making the network look like a place where people talked about hard news. “People stopped caring about Syria,” one former curator said. “[And] if it wasn’t trending on Facebook, it would make Facebook look bad.”
rolaids posted:Given the ostracization Khalek has been subjected to for her views on Syria I feel like she won't go back to supporting intervention, simply because she's probably burned too many bridges at this point. I know it's a crass analysis but along with Blumenthal and Norton they've all been branded as conspiracy theorist kooks and apologists for authoritarians so there'd be no stake in their supporting, say, an invasion of DPRK. And FWIW they seem staunchly opposed to any fuckery in Venezuela, unless I'm missing something.
It's also an absurd and idealist way to think about Ben Norton, who started down the right path when he was fired from his job after blowback from a story he wrote that was critical of Israel and its U.S. lobby
BREAKING: US envoy to the United Nations Nikki Haley says there cannot be stability in Syria with Assad as president
— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) September 15, 2017
ffs
marimite posted:But not as bad as pretending they're part of a psyop conspiracy with Taryn Fivek and Adam Johnson, and using the idea to try to sabotage American ML parties.
oh so that's what's going on here? i should always assume there's some sort of online drama gravity bending the light when people are seeing things i don't i suppose
cars posted:marimite posted:But not as bad as pretending they're part of a psyop conspiracy with Taryn Fivek and Adam Johnson, and using the idea to try to sabotage American ML parties.
oh so that's what's going on here? i should always assume there's some sort of online drama gravity bending the light when people are seeing things i don't i suppose
Look at umfuld, earwulf, redkahina, truths_pants. Not an exhaustive list, there's ~20-30 accounts at the center of the meme (some of them are clearly socks) and then kind a lot of people sort of in the orbit of the meme repeat parts of it. As in, it's leaking real bad.
Edited by marimite ()
marimite posted:Look at umfuld, earwulf, redkahina, truths_pants.
i genuinely appreciate the report from the outer rim but you'll understand if i don't
leninists acting like anarchists. i expect it from people who arent organizers but yeesh.
some of the anti-psl chatter is being spread by canadian maoists, whom i have to assume are a bit salty about their party splitting on issues no one understands, but its mostly kahina/earwulf/greaves, per the usual
Edited by JohnBeige ()
JohnBeige posted:the iraq side or the syria side
Hell,
colddays posted:Kurdistan on track to become Israel part two soon?
https://www.rt.com/usa/405070-tillerson-kurdistan-independence-vote/
is someone else from the state department gonna come out and say "please ignore mr tillerson's comments" now?
I am very happy to meet Colin @kaepernick7 . He loves peace and justice. We need more people like him in the world. pic.twitter.com/FttgVj1G1M
— Bana Alabed (@AlabedBana) October 5, 2017
— Bana al-Aweed (@BenghaziExpert) October 9, 2017