rolaids posted:CLEAT endorsed Greg Abbott. You'd think these goofuses would have the sense to lie and say they had no idea to make it look less fucking embarrassing. Knowing and allowing them to run is far worse.
at least the organization is named after spikes that attach to the bottom of a boot
JohnBeige posted:
ascism
glomper_stomper posted:so low on the ideological pecking order you're getting owned by trots.
wrap it up DSAilures!
I could do naught but hang my head in shame.
Edited by platzapS ()
Compared to other chapters I observe online, mine seems pretty dysfunctional atm and I've been working more with some other groups since. I probably will not renew my membership but if I end up moving to an area with a good chapter and no other good orgs I may stay around.
proread on amateur money handling: https://medium.com/@dsarichmond/statement-on-the-dsa-funds-for-victims-of-terrorism-in-charlottesville-b9f05b6da98c
theres also been a monthslong process in the LA chapter that at this point has people talking about the need to decertify the whole branch (because no one knows how to handle a harasser it seems) before anyone from national even visits to talk to people. bad precedent to set imo but watching national continue to do nothing while also posting about the problem on personal twitter accounts is infuriating
Edited by JohnBeige ()
rolaids posted:but it seems like a lot of eager new organizers having to build shit from scratch.
i really don't want to be discouraging and pessimistic here but oh wait who am i kidding.
it sounds to me like much of your membership (and not just entry level) is more concerned with the forms of performing a leftist appearance: having a social club where they can talk with like minded people and feel less lonely, maybe get out and soothe their hurt and anger with some direct action, but not focused on the content of actually accomplishing anything lasting.
this doesn't mean an org is full of bad people, and they aren't useless people either, but a part of organizing is assessing who is there to put in work and who is there just to be there (which will change depending on the context!) and when you don't differentiate people start to get responsibilities they don't want or can't handle and they drop the ball. when lots of your membership are primarily there just to be friends they will actively resist the confrontation necessary to do anything about these problems, and this hesitation can travel all the way to the top. in that kind of environment important things like institutional continuity, structure, and accountability will just rot away, what structures do remain will be greedily horded by entrenched cliques too busy protecting and justifying their own position to accomplish anything else.
this is a difficulty in any kind of organizing because we're all imperfect finite people, but it's practically an epidemic in big tent approaches like the DSA and *gag* Occupy. part of the problem is that these big tent organizations want to have everyone and be everything at once, and they can't. you need to have a plan for what your organization is actually for and what you're going to do about it.
that plan can be just to get people together to hang out, talk about leftism and bring in people on the periphery who are new to this kind of thing for some political education, but the discrete apparatus that accomplishes that isn't going to simultaneously be organizing active protection for comrades who have been bodily threatened by nazis and also coordinating legal defense against bullshit arrests and also handling finances and also managing a social media presence. these structures can exist together within one party, they can communicate and work together in harmony, but they can't function as an undifferentiated hodge podge where whoever shows up most winds up de facto responsible for everything. this post is getting away from me and i could probably ramble forever so i'm gonna call it here.
Actually, shriekingviolet's posts are always very insightful about organizations and how they should work, and I'm sure some of them will help me eventually. I just don't want to be one of those people that's just there to hang out and would be detrimental to getting any work done if I were given any responsibility, but it seems likely considering my current inexperience, ignorance, and possible crypto-liberalism.
sorry to only post here on personal thoughts and whatever, next time I post I'll have converted my local DSA to third-worldism I swear it
Please Join An Org. don't let me ranting about my obsession with structural problems curtail your own personal horizons. it's ok to join an org just to be another warm body and hang out. it's great even, just having social support networks is really valuable. it's even ok to get overwhelmed with responsibilities you can't handle or took due to social pressure but don't want, it sucks but failure is real and it happens and you can't ever succeed if fear of failure prevents all action. accept failure! all people need to do is be responsible about their political engagement, the same way you should be responsible at a job site or with your family or significant other: if you overextend yourself, if you fuck up, if you can't accept a decision, be honest. say that somethings wrong, say you can't do it, didn't do it, say what stopped you. explain the problem.
if you join an org and fuck up and take responsibility, even if that means you leave afterwards, it will still be more productive than someone who refuses to admit, to themselves or others, that something has gone wrong and doubles down on their mistakes or tries to hide them and thereby multiplies the difficulty.
if you're gonna play ball, you're gonna drop the ball: what actually matters is what happens next
rolaids posted:I like my comrades and the hard work our chapter does but it seems like a lot of eager new organizers having to build shit from scratch. I feel like PSL or WWP wouldn't have as much difficulty handling the harassment or monetary issues.
i feel you here but as prikyl pointed out years ago the LA branch disappeared a bunch of money that was due for soldiers in order to cover their office costs and Sac covered up a rapist until he left of his own accord. so while its true that dsa is having to build new infrastructure to handle these sorts of things, the fact that its far more transparent and people are more willing to complain online means national is forced to either be more responsive or get kicked while the individuals posting about it are more protected from repercussion.
im 100% for someone introducing instant recall procedures and striking dual-card language at the next congress. maybe we can try an anti-dem endorsement proposal again as well.
edit: link
Edited by mediumpig ()
But an honest look at the existing world has led us to converge on practical conclusions. We don’t need to agree on the precise nature of the USSR, for instance, to see that the Democrats are not a viable path to socialism.
Edited by platzapS ()
"(The DPRK) doesn't even have a word for 'democracy'...or at least they mean something different than we do."
"400 families control the country by propaganda and dominating institutions"
"They worship the Kims like gods"
Very disappointing, especially for people who seemed down with Cuba.
At least everyone agreed war with Korea would be stupid.