belgend posted:ftfy
that is mildly funny but the narrative has actually shifted quite a bit. there are media organizations who publicly admit that corbyn is a person now
also, since i am sniping, lol:
— Ryan Todd (@RyannTodd) June 8, 2017
One of the most extreme political entities in the British Isles, the 10 MPs of the DUP, is to wag the tail of Mrs May's minority Government
— Jon Snow (@jonsnowC4) June 9, 2017
the irony of jez being smeared as a terrorist sympathiser and the torys only go and form a coalition with actual fascist terrorists
tears posted:my other feeling is the the british election will be closer than the perma-wrong media keeps saying, ladbrokes are offering 7/1 on no overall majority. maybe i place bet
please quote this post back to me when im wrong tia
*checks my ladbrokes account* always bet on tears
Owen Jones in late March: "My passionate and sincere view is Jeremy Corbyn should stand down as soon as possible"
— Louis Allday (@Louis_Allday) June 1, 2017
Here's my video about Labour's future after Copeland. Whatever you think about what I say, it comes from the heart https://t.co/sjYWSjal37
— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) March 1, 2017
— Louis Allday (@Louis_Allday) June 9, 2017
imo it's important to distinguish between people who were always opposed to corbynism & those who had wobbles but fought for the right side
— Sam 🐫 Kriss (@sam_kriss) June 9, 2017
tears posted:yes
the political difference between Corbyn and e.g. Sanders is one of degree, not kind, but that degree of difference is likely possible because of how the Democrats have never even tried to prove themselves in even a surface way to be a bourgeois "party of labor" and at best were once a bourgeois party buoyed by criminal extortion of trade union members. just my 2c.
tears posted:that would require labour to actually have a chance of forming a govt, which with the numbers looks impossible for them to do; i dont see any reason why people would leave supporting corbyn, in fact this will probably embolden support, at least until after the next inevitable election, comming soon. Tories won the election, though they did it with a collosal self own, which is the real goodshit here
what would require labour forming a government? the thing i wrote about how they might not be able to form a government? i take your point on the side here but none of this follows as a response to what you're responding to
For most rank-and-file Democrats, the "PLP" equivalent is the party, and Sanders was treated as viable in the first place because he advanced into the rarefied neo-nobility of the Senate. When he was in the House he was treated as a crazy punk (Matt Taibbi got real sad when Sanders became a senator and would no longer meet with him in person). There's no sense among Democrats of there being a party at all that isn't people in Congress or the White House. Which I hope will come back to bite them in the ass but there's less opportunity for that because it seeps into everything... like Bhaskar Sunkara recently shared results of a poll of DSA members asking what the DSA's top priorities should be. It turns out that behind only "Medicare for all" (less a proposal than a slogan they've been promoting recently) the DSA membership's top-ranked priority, by a lot, is to elect DSA people to political office. And even Sunkara was like... whoa... that's not good.
TG posted:why do people call corbyn by a nickname that makes it sound like hes in the wu-tang clan
when the answer is contained in the question
ilmdge posted:im seeing some people start to say that for the tories to coalition with the DUP would be a violation of the good friday agreement. and that theresa may said it was happening before coming to an agreement with them anyway. she might not even get a majority coalition out of this
now here's where i'm a pessimist... but it does at least remind me a little of 2007 when Paisley was in the middle of taking a leak on the Good Friday agreement in the assembly & saying he'd never be First Minister with Sinn Fein holding the deputy's chair and freaking out the DUP people who wanted the biggest piece of the pie following the election, and suddenly "someone" called in a bomb threat and the whole place evacuated, and when the dust died down from the stampede Paisley's people were like, oh he didn't mean any of that, he'll definitely take the post. which still makes me laugh.
tears posted:my other prediction is that by 2030 the effects of climate change will be severe enough to make all this look like the stupid window dressing it was
gahaahaha
*cuts self to feel alive while drinking everclear*
drwhat posted:that is mildly funny but the narrative has actually shifted quite a bit. there are media organizations who publicly admit that corbyn is a person now
the narrative has shifted in the sense that the owen joneses of middle england have shifted their weather vane back to the left once it turned out - surprise surprise - momentum's face to face campagne actually worked, like it did with sanders and melenchon. the beeb and the rest of the blatantly right wing press still think corbyn is inert
i do agree w your prediction and think giving money to community policing is a correct line
it is hard not to enjoy that one guy actually eating his book on sky news or whatever it was
BREAK: DUP has NOT yet reached any agreement with the Tories. Sky sources: Downing Street issued the wrong statement in error.
— David Blevins (@skydavidblevins) June 10, 2017
belgend posted:giving money to community policing is a correct line
people are mad at zizek for this but i'm gratified that it only took a decade for people to finally come around to the idea that this guy who looks, talks and acts like a dipshit might be a dipshit
the left: holy shit this man is a genius