eccentricdeathmongrel posted:
that is brave
babyhueypnewton posted:His entire twitter feed is insulting people he thinks are pro-assad. Dude is losing it. Though i guess that's what twitter is for?
That and they need $7000 to fund Proyect's autohagiography
babyhueypnewton posted:His entire twitter feed is insulting people he thinks are pro-assad. Dude is losing it. Though i guess that's what twitter is for?
i declare victory on behalf of my memes
babyhueypnewton posted:His entire twitter feed is insulting people he thinks are pro-assad. Dude is losing it. Though i guess that's what twitter is for?
i guess its sort of like how freddie de boer seems to self-ID as a leftist of some variety but spends all of his time and energy on his less-wrong style lectures at activists
babyhueypnewton posted:Dude is losing it
did proyect ever *have* it ? ive spent a considerable amount of time trying to find some sort of non-garbage contribution or activity on his part and have never turned up anything
dipshit420 posted:Yikes he called us Pinheads.
Exaggeration bordering on slander. Clarence is the only real cenobite on this forum.
stegosaurus posted:i dont really trust cordeliers but thats funny to think about
I see why people are distrustful when it comes to the direction of his speculation and polemics, but I've never seen or heard of him making stuff up like this. You've probably seen more than I have though.
where he sets up this sort of questioning or skeptical mood over the hpv vaccine and its effectiveness when in fact it has a high success rate at preventing cancer, and is widely endorsed by pretty much all cancer doctors. the 'sources' he cites that call this into question are basically non-peer reviewed editorials, and anti-vaxxer sites. some of the only peer-reviewed criticism of gardasil has been retracted for being scientifically unsound as well. thug lessons, pbuh, pointed this out when i shared the article a few years ago.
theres probably other ways to make this sort of criticism without relying on absolutely anything you can find to make your argument even if its extremely sketchy
stegosaurus posted:theres probably other ways to make this sort of criticism without relying on absolutely anything you can find to make your argument even if its extremely sketchy
when you've apparently been caught red handed posing as fictitious antisemitic Ahmadinejad supporters in order to "prove" that Ahmadinejad supporters are antisemitic, I don't think "is this argument sound, accurate, and fair" enters into your decision making process anymore. more of a "how fast will this get me my next cheque from a three letter agency" decision tree.
shriekingviolet posted:stegosaurus posted:theres probably other ways to make this sort of criticism without relying on absolutely anything you can find to make your argument even if its extremely sketchy
when you've apparently been caught red handed posing as fictitious antisemitic Ahmadinejad supporters in order to "prove" that Ahmadinejad supporters are antisemitic, I don't think "is this argument sound, accurate, and fair" enters into your decision making process anymore. more of a "how fast will this get me my next cheque from a three letter agency" decision tree.
i dont understand what this is referring to sorry...
eccentricdeathmongrel posted:Something about this is very amusing to me
@Obscureobjet @GBabeuf Proyect used to post comments on MRZine blog under assumed names, posing as various anti-Semites who would "endorse"
— Club des Cordeliers (@cordeliers) March 9, 2015@Obscureobjet @GBabeuf anything sympathetic to Ahmadinejad. I believe Yoshie caught him with an IP trace.
— Club des Cordeliers (@cordeliers) March 9, 2015
shriekingviolet posted:I was referring to this, maybe I misinterpreted it:
eccentricdeathmongrel posted:Something about this is very amusing to me
@Obscureobjet @GBabeuf Proyect used to post comments on MRZine blog under assumed names, posing as various anti-Semites who would "endorse"
— Club des Cordeliers (@cordeliers) March 9, 2015@Obscureobjet @GBabeuf anything sympathetic to Ahmadinejad. I believe Yoshie caught him with an IP trace.
— Club des Cordeliers (@cordeliers) March 9, 2015
yeah i agree thats funny if true. but i was saying that that dude has no credibility for me anymore so i would have to see the actual ip trace.
tpaine posted:The Lewis Project
tina fey produced netflix adaptation of his comic
stegosaurus posted:its mainly here http://www.rupe-india.org/57/pharma.html
where he sets up this sort of questioning or skeptical mood over the hpv vaccine and its effectiveness when in fact it has a high success rate at preventing cancer, and is widely endorsed by pretty much all cancer doctors. the 'sources' he cites that call this into question are basically non-peer reviewed editorials, and anti-vaxxer sites. some of the only peer-reviewed criticism of gardasil has been retracted for being scientifically unsound as well. thug lessons, pbuh, pointed this out when i shared the article a few years ago.
theres probably other ways to make this sort of criticism without relying on absolutely anything you can find to make your argument even if its extremely sketchy
Levich doesn't misrepresent the content of his Gardasil-related citations in themselves, which misrepresentation I'd consider necessary and sufficient to declare "undergraduate-level" source abuse. You could call him for deceit by omission, I guess, as pertains the breadth of evidence pointing to the vaccine's safety—although I question the claim that its "high success rate at preventing cancer" has been distinctly confirmed, q.v. the reference-supported editorial by Haug (http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/184404 , "represent((ing)) the ((opinion)) of the ((author)) and ((the Journal of the American Medical Association))"), which weighs measured efficacy against but prospective risks. A petition by feminist physicians and an Indian parliamentary commission provide primary PATH-related documentation—hardly a hodgepodge of "anti-vax" quackery; in fact, the assertions of medical malpractice are mostly separable from determinations of intrinsic hazard, unless you take an extreme utilitarian outlook on experimentation. (It's true that the petitioners' extrapolation of 1,200 girls suffering adverse effects is methodologically opaque. Whether Levich presents it as such is more subjective.)
Notwithstanding the HPV bits, however, I believe his primary thesis—that "Global Health Governance" is synonymous with medical exploitation and underdevelopment of the Third fucking World—holds water. Part IV, on the "broader agenda" of the Foundation et alia., is especially good.
Edited by eccentricdeathmongrel ()
I will be posting the only “Fresh” review of this film on Rotten Tomatoes, where it has been dismissed as a TV movie (director George Mendeluk, a Ukrainian who grew up in Canada, has made TV films for many years) filled with mawkish melodrama. No matter how accurate the criticisms are, people trying to understand the Ukrainian political crisis of today will have a much better understanding after seeing “Bitter Harvest”. Needless to say, the Ukrainian press differs sharply from Mendeluk’s detractors at the Village Voice and elsewhere.
When your propaganda is too poor for the liberal mainstream, there's always trots!
babyhueypnewton posted:http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/24/socialism-betrayed-inside-the-ukrainian-holodomor/
I will be posting the only “Fresh” review of this film on Rotten Tomatoes,
stalin ate all the tomatoes and paid the critics not to rave
can’t sidestep the reality of Stalin’s killing machine
i didn't know Bitter Harvest was a musical
babyhueypnewton posted:http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/24/socialism-betrayed-inside-the-ukrainian-holodomor/
I will be posting the only “Fresh” review of this film on Rotten Tomatoes, where it has been dismissed as a TV movie (director George Mendeluk, a Ukrainian who grew up in Canada, has made TV films for many years) filled with mawkish melodrama. No matter how accurate the criticisms are, people trying to understand the Ukrainian political crisis of today will have a much better understanding after seeing “Bitter Harvest”. Needless to say, the Ukrainian press differs sharply from Mendeluk’s detractors at the Village Voice and elsewhere.
When your propaganda is too poor for the liberal mainstream, there's always trots!
came to post this lol
@___@