Petrol posted:fape posted:
& http://www.upworthy.com/7-real-things-you-can-do-right-now-about-the-catastrophe-in-aleppo
been meaning to ask this for a while, if anyone has sources to enlighten me id appreciate it - was Doctors Without Borders ever good? without paying attention to them id always assumed they were genuinely neutral, their heavy involvement in the Last Hospital In Aleppo propaganda over the past year and now their inclusion in lists like this obviously give the lie to that impression
maybe the hospital that got utterly destroyed in afghanistan finally drove them over the edge? i've been donating for the past couple years, i figure as long as their hospitals are getting bombed by all sides, they're still neutral. if there's been a leadership change or something i'd like to know.
xipe posted:Robin Yassin Kassab also looks like a neanderthal from a prehistory museum
e: what the fuck is this
quoting for ban
Edited by babyhueypnewton ()
xipe posted:
i bet he's really good at poker
Urbandale posted:BHPN ive never seen you intervene against someone getting ifapped for obvious racism before but theyre stil getting ifapped for obvious racism. im antiban but im waiting til they decide to say something about this post that isnt throwaway bullshit, which is all thats been said so far
That's fair i forgot ifap exists
https://syriainbrief.wordpress.com/2016/08/19/leftist-groups-on-the-syrian-civil-war/
this is better tho
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c5KNtwuqBSs3wbZQt7UsOrmFHPD-ajbHTmqnanUjne8/edit?usp=sharing
Edited by Urbandale ()
c_man posted:i cant say im shocked that bhpn is one of the "anti-imperialists" who lets actual racist comments slide because someone has "good ideology"
A poster who is not a moderator and suggested self-criticism is still somehow "letting racist comments slide"
c_man posted:yes. saying "they made a racist joke but i like their ideology so let's not be mean" is absolutely "letting it slide"
How about "They made a racist joke but clearly care about contributing to this forum so let's give them the opportunity to apologize before slapping down another exile" young doubt-beneficiary-denier
c_man posted:i generally think this forum is way too lax wrt racist/misogynist/etc jokes and comments and am apparently one of the only people who thinks so. obviously its up to the moderators to consider for themselves what sort of community they want to have
I hate this shit too actually, but we only have post editing, force logout, and IFAP. Thread monitors can issue 6-hours probations, should I just appoint more of those?
c_man posted:i generally think this forum is way too lax wrt racist/misogynist/etc jokes and comments and am apparently one of the only people who thinks so. obviously its up to the moderators to consider for themselves what sort of community they want to have
I think so too, but I'm pretty new here so I try not to call people out b/c I want everyone to like me . That's an easier feat to manage for me because I'm White Man.
It doesn't matter what irony level you are on, you can't just say "I'm going to drop this 'C/F/N/Z-word' in the forum because everyone knows I'm actually woke, so I'm obvs just poking fun at bigotry."
swampman posted:I hate this shit too actually, but we only have post editing, force logout, and IFAP. Thread monitors can issue 6-hours probations, should I just appoint more of those?
dont ask me, i have no interest or expertise in forum moderation
c_man posted:i generally think this forum is way too lax wrt racist/misogynist/etc jokes and comments and am apparently one of the only people who thinks so
it's also a very popular opinion to express loudly on twitter among people who quit this forum for completely different reasons
swampman posted:Thread monitors can issue 6-hours probations, should I just appoint more of those?
imo yes, i never ifapped anybody and shriekingviolet did so rarely & it made everybody more conscientious of the community rather than giving them the excuse of raging against the machine
cars posted:it's also a very popular opinion to express loudly on twitter among people who quit this forum for completely different reasons
what point are you trying to make here?
c_man posted:what point are you trying to make here?
that you are unlikely to leave a vibrant forum for left political discussion online or off- and find another one where those issues are less prominent. if you want to find one where they are neurotically covered either by constant finger pointing/farcical self flagellation in place of self criticism or by flat out denial though, the world is your oyster.
cars posted:that you are unlikely to leave a vibrant forum for left political discussion online or off- and find another one where those issues are less prominent. if you want to find one where they are neurotically covered either by constant finger pointing/farcical self flagellation in place of self criticism or by flat out denial though, the world is your oyster.
you dont think its possible to have left spaces where making bigoted comments or using slurs is not common and tolerated?
edit for clarity: to be more precise, you dont think that pushing back hard against bigoted comments or slurs is important or useful for creating a vibrant space for left political discussion? because my thought would be that implicit toleration of that behavior would be likely to discourage marginalized members of the population (that is, people who the left is supposed to be supporting) from participating in the ostensibly "vibrant" discussion
Edited by c_man ()
cars posted:i don't think either of those things you suggest i am thinking.
then i would ask that you explain your opinion on the usefulness of pushing back hard on bigotry/slurs in left spaces. that's what i'm talking about and i dont really care about what baby finland or sam kriss or whoever have to say about this forum.
c_man posted:then i would ask that you explain your opinion on the usefulness of pushing back hard on bigotry/slurs in left spaces. that's what i'm talking about and i dont really care about what baby finland or sam kriss or whoever have to say about this forum.
the disagreement here is probably over the methods we use to do that.
As in, it's impossible to create a space that does not tolerate these things and that it is unimportant or not useful to try?
Belphegor posted:Does that mean you think the opposite?
As in, it's impossible to create a space that does not tolerate these things and that it is unimportant or not useful to try?
i don't know who is supposed to answer this but asking people to swear fealty to statements on which we are all likely to agree is maybe a different conversation than whether ifap is good.
You are right that everyone here is likely to 'swear fealty' to combating bigotry, making spaces more inclusive etc.
People (myself included) can still do lip service to these things but ignore them in deed, though.
Can someone explain what happened to wddp?
What happened to that place to make people reluctant to become 'ban-happy' and 'insular?