i dont want help
it's cool. acceleration now
drwhat posted:i shoved the working class into a bag and pushed it down the stairs
i crashed the economy with my stock trades. i don't care
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:trump never really ran for president before. he talked about it a bunch but i dont think he ever actually had a campaign
when i was a kid i used to pay attention to him every time he did it because he always had a wacky melange of opinions. like he used to be majorly pro choice.
glomper_stomper posted:i agree with the lack of tacit support for free trade deals but i still stand by the understanding that trump isn't necessarily dismissive of the US imperialist project, he's primarily challenging the particular method of profit extraction that doesn't benefit the troops or taxpayers quite as well as he would have it.
imo he's suggesting the u.s. maintain or even improve its current way of life (not standard of living, but way of life) while getting rid of that project. which won't work. but some sectors that must be mobilized, assuming you're not third-worldist, are going to have to figure that one out by working through the conversation publicly at least. and i don't think that's accelerationism although accelerationists wouldn't oppose it. i think i mentioned this on here, i agree with goatstein that the line here is more like, we need to get those lazy third-world freeloaders off our dime, and to me thats always a way for imperialists to say "we know crisis is looming and we are scared as shit this one will break us".
thirdplace posted:I don't think any of the very slightly critical things Trump or his supporters say about the American imperial project should be viewed as anything other than oppositional positioning made to contrast himself with Teh Establishment
so? what does that matter?
cars posted:so? what does that matter?
because it suggests that the actual policy is irrelevant to both him and his supporters, it's just a meaningless means to the end of "we can trust this billionaire new yorker who has nothing in common with us neither culturally nor materially because he went to a DC cocktail party and slit the throat of a sacred cow and got blood all over everyone's tuxes"
thirdplace posted:because it suggests that the actual policy is irrelevant to both him and his supporters, it's just a meaningless means to the end of "we can trust this billionaire new yorker who has nothing in common with us neither culturally nor materially because he went to a DC cocktail party and slit the throat of a sacred cow and got blood all over everyone's tuxes"
thats true but the actual policy of a president and the things they said in the runup to the elections have basically zero correlation in basically every case. i dont think trump is any different from anyone else here. that being said you can learn real things from how people react to the empty promises being made, and the promises do have real effects on the way people organize themselves, even if it's not clear how they relate directly. like, from the trump campaign you can learn that there's a growing white supremacist contingent that's dissatisfied with what it's been getting recently and that the trump campaign is bringing it into the open and helping it grow. this doesn't really say much about what trump would do as president though.
cars posted:i mean no he's not a marxist leninist anti imperialist for realsies no take backs obviously. bernie sanders is not a socialist and wishing doesn't make things so,
are you really equivocating between sanders supporters and trump supporters, and suggesting they are just as likely to support anti-imperialism, anti-racism, etc given the Right Organizing Tactics? if so this strikes me as absurd. i guess i keep going back to the various BAR pieces on trump/sanders splitting the parties and even they pretty explicitly describe trump supporters as uniformly white supremacist and not some kind of organizational opportunity in the same way that they sometimes talk about the sanders campaign.
edit: vvv ok that makes much more sense vvv
Edited by c_man ()
glomper_stomper posted:i basically agree with that and goatstein's stuff about support being more about the third-world freeloaders or whatever. i never doubted the potential was there in trump's supporters but, as with sanders, i'm not sure how anyone's supposed to seize the opportunity to turn social chauvinists into Real Marxist-Leninists at this point.
me neither, i think that would be impossible right now and if anyone offers you a plan to do it smell hard and you will smell shit. what i'm saying is, these things have been laid bare and obviously trump didn't magic them up in a few months any more than putin magicked up russian identity in ukraine in a few months, and yet both of those are the semi-official position of both bourgeois parties in the united states and when something like that happens, history is our friend and marxist is friend to all children of history.
c_man posted:are you really equivocating between sanders supporters and trump supporters, and suggesting they are just as likely to support anti-imperialism, anti-racism, etc given the Right Organizing Tactics? if so this strikes me as absurd.
the fact that it strikes you as absurd should answer that question for you