Red Guards Austin: WE WILL NOT INTEGRATE INTO A BURNING HOUSE: Polemic on Bad Gender Practice in the Liaison Committee for a New Communist Party (NCP-LC) (link)
Red Guards Los Angeles: Statement on dissociation from the New Communist Party (Liaison Committee) (link)
Literally One Person In Philadelphia: Dynamite at the Throne: A Summation from the Philadelphia “Branch” of the NCP-(LC) (link)
The Maoist Communist Gruppe in NY: ON SELF-CRITICISM AND PARTY BUILDING (link)
The MCG in Virginia (responding to NY): The externalization of the anti-revisionist struggle is the negation of proletarian politics (link)
Edited by HenryKrinkle ()
stegosaurus posted:Dynamite at the Throne
goddammit i was going to use this title for a huge dump i've been saving up all day.
HenryKrinkle posted:i have never heard of any of these orgs. i mean how do you even keep track of them? is there some sort of introductory course on US commie orgs?
sure here you go
last year the ncp(lc) eventually had to expel at least one of the members themselves again for the exact same reasons, because surprisingly enough individuals that are removed from their party on account of sexual harassment probably won't stop sexually harassing. they couched the expulsion in a bizarre statement about how when they did it, it was rectifying patriarchal behaviour in the party, but when the ncp(oc) had done the same thing it was purely based on an opportunist line on political differences. but not without repeatedly dragging their feet on the question, on the basis of which they at least had the awareness to conduct some semblance of self-criticism:
If this comrade would have enthusiastically and willingly shown initiative throughout the rectification process, he would not have been expelled because the comrade would have proved he rectified his patriarchal practice thus becoming a full member in good standing. Unfortunately, that did not take place. Not only did this comrade fail to rectify, but his patriarchal practice had become worse over time putting other women in similar situations that exemplifies his sexist practice. The comrade in question has had a history of patriarchal and/or sexual misconduct for a few years. And it hasn’t been handled correctly for several reasons: 1.) criticism and rectification of this individual not on the basis of his practice necessarily but because he held a minority political line within communist organization; 2.) male chauvinism in the organization did not take the rectification at all times seriously enough; 3.) because the individual comrade has been seen as valuable and advanced on other questions except on the question of gender and; 4.) liberalism of friendships over politics. None are good excuses in the rectification of this individual are reflected in organizational liberalisms and not putting politics in command. If so we might have had the opportunity to “cure the sickness to save the patient”. But the blame does not fall exclusively on the organization but also must fall on the individual in question for not taking the rectification in a serious manner.
despite conducting such self-criticism, they apparently took no steps to actually dissociate with the individual in question. the red guard - los angeles, who had been working closely with the ncp(lc) for months, formally cut ties with them because, weirdly enough, a micro-party that just happened to coincidentally split when their parent group expelled a contingent of sexual harassers and abusers had failed to isolate themselves from a sexual harasser and abuser
the remainder of the original party that expelled those who would form the ncp(lc), the ncp(oc), reformed as the maoist communist group after the split. they're hard to follow because of their completely legitimate distaste of communist sects that appear to be primarily concerned with blogging, which the ncp(lc) appeared to be, but they look like they do a lot of good work locally. their branch in virginia comprises most of the people who had been working and conducting communication with rashid and the prison chapter of the new afrikan black panther party
rather than just gloating over the failure of their opponents both branches have taken this as an opportunity to conduct self-criticism toward questions of political leadership in the organisation as a whole. good sh*t.
Anyway this is to say that the ncp-lc were a micro sect of blogger friends who were mad at being kicked out of another party for being misogynists. apparently this isn't a stable basis to form a party on.
Edited by blinkandwheeze ()
blinkandwheeze posted:a micro sect of blogger friends who were mad at being kicked out of another party for being misogynists. apparently this isn't a stable basis to form a party on.
What about a webforum?
EmanuelaBrolandi posted:blinkandwheeze posted:
a micro sect of blogger friends who were mad at being kicked out of another party for being misogynists. apparently this isn't a stable basis to form a party on.
What about a webforum?
i was about to say, if these folks count as a party, then the rhizzone is a major power bloc, a handful of my drinking buddies are a maoist splinter sect, and my neighbor's dog is a powerful insurgent fraktion.
shriekingviolet posted:, if these folks count as a party, then the rhizzone is a major power bloc,
The Party for Socialism and Libations
Edit: I was gonna do an effort post on this since I studied Hindi for 3 yrs and it's a rhizzone favorite subject but I've been derailed by the How I Found God and Communism Thru St Francis of Assisi: A Whitemuslimposters Thread
Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()
glomper_stomper posted:
clicked, got Spartacist International Alliance, remembered Sparts exist, drank
EmanuelaBrolandi posted:in the last couple months I've read like 5 books on naxals and like a dozen English and Hindi language documents by CPI (Maoist) and I still don't understand the history of like the five fractious parties from the last 80 years so I guess this isn't just an American thing.
the best book on this is "revolutionary violence: a study of the maoist movement in india" by manoranjan mohanty tho it's from 1977 so it's pretty outdated.
blinkandwheeze posted:the best book on this is "revolutionary violence: a study of the maoist movement in india" by manoranjan mohanty tho it's from 1977 so it's pretty outdated.
Copy. I've downloaded that but not read it yet. About to finish a third of a series of books written around 2005-10 and then go back to 70s ones. Those were two very different times for the Party, so it's quite interesting.
Bablu posted:links to the materials in hindi pls? i dunno how to work a hindi keyboard so i can't search for stuff
I don't have a computer rn and I don't have a Hindi keyboard on my phone but I'll look for em one of these days
Some CPI Maoist docs there tho
MarianneSadd posted:Do you read RUPE, Emanuela?
No but now I will