The funniest thing which took way too long for me to get is that he is clearly the best candidate if the Dems really, really wanted to win the election, since every contest he's the preferred candidate of independents, whereas hilary is winning because of established democrat support, aka people who would vote democrat anyway.
He's more of a Kodos, who took the skin of a democrat but his aims are (slightly) more to the left. It's a two party system people!
Red_Canadian posted:A twice daily amendment for full communism now wouldn't have much success either.
Citation needed
Red_Canadian posted:Sure he voted on similar lines, but what else could he do?
Not vote in favor of the deliberate murder and deprivation of millions??? I dunno I'm just spitballin' here, I'm sure that "do u support raining continuous death and horror onto innocents y/n" is a really tricky question.
In 2004, Democratic operatives were especially zealous in their efforts against my campaign. They hired private investigators to harass my campaign’s petition circulators in their homes in Ohio and Oregon and falsely threatened them with criminal prosecution for fake names that saboteurs had signed on their petitions, according to sworn affidavits from the workers and letters containing threats that were presented in court. Our petitions were also disqualified on arbitrary grounds: In Ohio, complaints submitted in court and to the office of the Secretary of State by groups of Democratic voters led officials there to invalidate our petitions. They disqualified hundreds of signatures on one list, for instance, because of a discrepancy involving the petition circulator’s signature. In Oregon, Democratic Secretary of State Bill Bradbury retroactively applied certain rules in a way that suddenly rendered our previously compliant petitions invalid.
Democrats and their allies (some later reimbursed by the DNC, according to both campaign finance reports and a party official in Maine who testified under oath) enlisted more than 90 lawyers from more than 50 law firms to file 29 complaints against my campaign in 18 states and with the Federal Election Commission for the express purpose of using the cost and delay of litigation to drain our resources. “We wanted to neutralize his campaign by forcing him to spend money and resources defending these things,” operative Toby Moffett told The Washington Post in 2004.
Democrats falsely accused my campaign of fraud in state after state. In Pennsylvania, they forced us off the ballot after challenging more than 30,000 signatures on spurious technical grounds. My running mate, Peter Camejo, and I were ordered to pay more than $81,000 in litigation costs the plaintiffs, a group of Democratic voters, said they incurred. In an effort to collect, their law firm, Reed Smith ,which the DNC also hired in that cycle, froze my personal accounts at several banks for eight years. A criminal prosecution by the state attorney general later revealed that Pennsylvania House Democrats had, illegally at taxpayer expense, prepared the complaints against our campaign, and several people were convicted of related felonies. A federal court in Pennsylvania ultimately struck down the state law used against me that had led to the order that I pay the litigation costs. But Reed Smith was still allowed to keep $34,000 it withdrew from my accounts, because state courts wouldn’t let me present evidence that could have permitted me to recover the money.
With the exception of this handful of felony convictions, most of the partisans who fought to keep me from running got away with it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/883a9/883a957067bbb6f0cd97c984a41fda850cdd9248" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee1a3/ee1a3730be00d0dda206518419c98da0da862c95" alt=""
littlegreenpills posted:taxes are slavery to the fascist bourgeois state
Agreed. Google Ron Paul.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25aaf/25aaf0097ba218d6cd877d00276af8715a22e0a4" alt=""
ilmdge posted:Susan Sarandon literally said if Donald Trump gets in, maybe he'll bring the revolution to pass immediately.
i passed a revolution this morning. it was a little bloody.
c_man posted:le "goatstein's posting" meme
nice "ironic criticism of my posting" meme
ilmdge posted:Susan Sarandon literally said if Donald Trump gets in, maybe he'll bring the revolution to pass immediately.
And then Chris Hayes sputtered something about the Leninist Contradictions Model or whatever before he quickly changed the subject and concluded the interview and then the internet went apeshit.
On a sort of related note, I'm pretty sure most Pro-Trump Accelerationists exist to troll basically anyone who doesn't know a lick about socialism because I'm finding that unenlightened liberals and conservatives do not react to the notion of a Trumpenproletariat Revolution very rationally, at all and some of them actually buy into that crap and get legit upset.
it's pretty great.
tpaine posted:it's like yeah, goons breathe air too. should i stop doing that? don't answer that you guys. ohmygosh i might start crying