#161
Yoyoyo gwash what it is

I am smoking trees
#162
The g-wash what it is cartoon formed the basis for the broadway smash hit hamilton
#163

Gibbonstrength posted:

{presses fingers against temples} crow is going to be upset about this thread



lol

#164
~*Turns too look into your faace with a really serious look*~

This is a bad fuckin thread.
#165
The following people report to my office, whereinst they will be bashed wit h old dusty books published 40 years ago by Progress Publishers amd thwapped with enormous cartoon fans made of studies of Chinese economy:

c_man
Gssh
Panopticon
drwhat
walkinginonit
FAILAIDS
elemennop
Flappo
TheIneff
rhizzzone
tentativelurkeraccount

#166

FSAD posted:

The CCP specifically arrests people who request that the government adhere to the constitution of the nation, so claiming that the nation is founded on communist values because they are built into the constitution is kind of a false start. As presumably the only person here who has actually taught in a Chinese university setting I can tell you that politics is seen as a joke even by those who teach it, and the textbooks are made to be deliberately boring to turn people off from the idea of politics in general. Imagine a textbook with no photos except black and white drawings of bearded 19th century communists subtitled with birth and death dates.

The teachers of these courses generally know that this is a joke and give the students lists of a few important facts to memorize for the tests then let them work on other homework, sleep or play with their cell phones during class, no attendance is usually taken. Schools establishing "Schools of Marxism" should be looked at much more as establishing schools of ideological control and nationalism. A common activity in university level "Marxism" classes is watching WWII era movies about fighting the Japanese. When President Xi says the magic words of Marxism and Communism and Socialism with Chinese Characteristics then because all power flows from the font a smart university president blows with the wind, but I'm quite certain that if Xi could jettison the communist message from the party doctrine without repercussions/complete loss of historical raison d'etre and instead adopt all of the aspects of the 1930s Kuomintang party then I'm sure he would.

The CCP adheres far more to the nationalist and ideological rhetoric of something like the New Life Movement -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Life_Movement but essentially it's a mix of reverence for the past glories of the Chinese nation which is magically different from all other human societies, elimination of internal enemies to the state (especially troublesome minorities), uplifting of the moral virtues of the Chinese people, rabid nationalism to regain China's previous position as the center of the world which it held for 5,000 years before it was attacked for no reason at all, and the need for strong leadership for the Chinese people in the form of an authoritarian government because Chinese people can not be trusted to have democracy due to their inherent corruption and family ties. If a lot of this stuff sounds contradictory to you then you're a fucking genius.

Kemal Ataturk said that if he could essentially flip a switch and turn all of the Turks Christian he'd do it, because his goal of modernizing and creating a nation was stymied at multiple turns by his people's insistence on an Islamic identity. The Chinese government has for 70 years insisted that it's a Communist government and that Communism was correct. If they drop that idea then they lose all legitimacy. Ask any Chinese person what Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is and be prepared for a fun ride into either eye rolling or meaningless slogans.

Saying that China is embracing Communism and the Party supports a future transition to Full COmmunism and then throwing out some shitty university's School of Communism webpage is like saying the USA's policy is dictated by Noam Chomsky at premiere American university Massachussetts Institute of Technology.

Everything going on in the CCP now is designed to ferret out the followers of Jiang Zemin as Xi Jinping solidifies his completely authoritarian control over the party. He's circumvented everyone in the Politburo Standing Committee and created 'Working Groups' to take over the functioning of departments of state. Imagine if every department in the US was controlled by a powerful dude who got to treat it as his own personal fiefdom (I'm not being sexist they're all dudes). Then the American president, who previously had to work via cooperation and coercion to get stuff done through these people in charge of the departments in a completely opaque and non-democratic way, decides to create a Secretary of Energy Helper position and takes over the control of the Dept. of Energy. Since he's made clear he will drop people for corruption for not playing ball, you essentially let him do it. Because everyone at every level of Chinese government is corrupt and has practiced malfeasance and cooked the books to get promoted to their current level of power, when you're arresting and ruining people for corruption, then everyone is on the line. This is possible because no one is expected to follow the law in China, because the law doesnt matter. The institutions of state are meaningless. The 'Governor' of Tibet is an ethnic Tibetan, but the CCP Party Secretary of Tibet is where the actual decisions are made. There isn't even a separate track for government/party promotion. If you do a 'good job' as governor of a province you might be promoted to party secretary of that province and have some real power. Same is true of city governments.

When you take the bullshit of Communism in China seriously then you reveal your complete ignorance because not even the Chinese take it seriously, so why do you think you know better than them?

l4fQh8E3eKY

This is the purpose of COmmunism in China now, a bunch of fat rich old men clap for Red Songs then go out to raid the pension fund and use the money to buy houses in Los Angeles ARGH YOURE SO FUCKING STUPID!!! *hits own head with frying pan*



like which one of you morons that upvoted this call yourself marxist? You know what materialism is? Are you a huge fucking idiot? How stupid ARE you. IM gonna KICK your ASS

#167
chinese students may find the marxism classes taught at uni to be pretty dull but tsinghuas intro to maoism class was neat imo
#168
The Framewrk ft. MA$E -- Can't Real My Race
#169

Urbandale posted:

chinese students may find the marxism classes taught at uni to be pretty dull but tsinghuas intro to maoism class was neat imo

mao zedong is really neat!
he is filled with marxist meat!

#170
i'm going to learn chinese yolo
#171
[account deactivated]
#172

getfiscal posted:

i'm going to learn chinese yolo

Or in your case, yol0

#173

getfiscal posted:

i'm going to learn chinese yolo



你活一次

#174
i dont see what the issue is with noting day-to-day corruption in china. the western governments have a fairly unique set of constraints and available resources that disincentivize that sort of exchange. you have elite institutions with continuity to the (mostly) precapitalist artistocratic period as historical avenues to power and influence that were very slowly opened up to allow the rising bourgeoisie to join in wielding influence, state structures with material requirements to be reliably able to discipline imperial holdings and wipe out resistance and several hundred years of subsumption of the state by capital, influx of stolen wealth to create a middle class (along with formal ideological targets) seem like concrete material-historical reasons why we dont see the same degree in core imperial countries. and as other people have noted, in these countries in situations where there it is common to have bribes either a payment is introduced as part of the formalized practice or class identity is directly enforced with no money exchanged (e.g. rich/important person gets rushed to critical care while poor people bleed out in the waiting room). there have been people before who have brought up the informal economy and customs involving bribes as being one of the few ways that repressed groups can operate (here i'm thinking of the guy who said this about scheduled castes and tribes in india but idr how good that argument was)
#175
and of course the state apparatuses that aren't related to extraction of wealth and its administration are slowly dissolved and commodified whenever possible
#176
sorry about my thread
#177
noting corruption isnt the problem and no one said it was as far as i know. the issue is treating it as an aberration instead of something that every state will have and with the specific claim that china is more corrupt than the US
#178
i mean if the term "corruption" is an issue i think "informal economy" is probably a more relevant way of distinguishing the differences anyway
#179
not really, this is what i was saying earlier. we dont think corruption in the US is a thing because its largely codified. police have civil seizure codes, lobbyists + PACs have laws restraining their action, etc. corruption is pretty formal
#180
is it possible for one country to be more corrupt than another, would you say
#181
Imperialism and corruption are two sides of the same coin, that coin is an ass penny, war is a racket
#182
n/m

Edited by orchestra_hit ()

#183

Urbandale posted:

not really, this is what i was saying earlier. we dont think corruption in the US is a thing because its largely codified. police have civil seizure codes, lobbyists + PACs have laws restraining their action, etc. corruption is pretty formal


thats what im talking about too. fsad was shocked, shocked that the number on his receipt was different from the number that he paid and presumably would have been happier if the number of his receipt was the number he paid. im saying that informal exchanges like that are much more likely in places that dont have long institutional continuity (e.g. communist/anti-imperial revolutions destroying capitalistic/imperial institutions) because the formalization is the result of many layers of subsumption of the mechanisms of distribution and exchange by the dominant mode of production

#184
im 1000% sure that there was a much stronger informal economy 100 or even 50 years ago in the imperial core, and that most of the difference came from the brief period where workers movements were making strong demands that prompted the development of public services out of a share of the extracted surplus. the tendency of capital to consolidate probably plays a role too i guess? (shifting from personalized/individualized and less consistent forms like direct bribes to well understood and legalistic forms like lobbying, consulting and fines)
#185
[account deactivated]
#186
this world is so corrupt
#187

FSAD posted:

The CCP specifically arrests people who request that the government adhere to the constitution of the nation,(CITATION NEEDED) so claiming that the nation is founded on communist values because they are built into the constitution is kind of a false start.(LOGIC DOESNT FOLLOW) As presumably the only person here who has actually taught in a Chinese university setting (NOT A STANDARD OF EVIDENCE) I can tell you that politics is seen as a joke even by those who teach it,(CITATION NEEDED) and the textbooks are made to be deliberately boring to turn people off from the idea of politics in general. Imagine a textbook with no photos except black and white drawings of bearded 19th century communists subtitled with birth and death dates.(NOT A STANDARD OF EVIDENCE)

The teachers of these courses generally know that this is a joke (CITATION NEEDED) and give the students lists of a few important facts to memorize for the tests then let them work on other homework, sleep or play with their cell phones during class, no attendance is usually taken.Schools establishing "Schools of Marxism" should be looked at much more as establishing schools of ideological control and nationalism.(EMPTY BOURGEOIS CLAIM) A common activity in university level "Marxism" classes is watching WWII era movies about fighting the Japanese.(AND?) When President Xi says the magic words of Marxism and Communism and Socialism with Chinese Characteristics then because all power flows from the font a smart university president blows with the wind, but I'm quite certain that if Xi could jettison the communist message from the party doctrine without repercussions/complete loss of historical raison d'etre and instead adopt all of the aspects of the 1930s Kuomintang party then I'm sure he would.(COUNTERFACTUAL HISTORY NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FACTS)

The CCP adheres far more to the nationalist and ideological rhetoric of something like the New Life Movement -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Life_Movement (CITATION NEEDED)but essentially it's a mix of reverence for the past glories of the Chinese nation which is magically different from all other human societies,CITATION NEEDED elimination of internal enemies to the state (especially troublesome minorities),(CITATION NEEDED) (NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AVAILABLE DATA) uplifting of the moral virtues of the Chinese people, rabid nationalism to regain China's previous position as the center of the world which it held for 5,000 years before it was attacked for no reason at all,(CITATION NEEDED) and the need for strong leadership for the Chinese people in the form of an authoritarian government (EMPTY CLAIM) because Chinese people can not be trusted to have democracy due to their inherent corruption and family ties.(CITATION NEEDED) If a lot of this stuff sounds contradictory to you then you're a fucking genius.(CITATION NEEDED)

Kemal Ataturk said that if he could essentially flip a switch and turn all of the Turks Christian he'd do it, because his goal of modernizing and creating a nation was stymied at multiple turns by his people's insistence on an Islamic identity. (BOURGEOIS OBFUSCATION) (CITATION NEEDED) The Chinese government has for 70 years insisted that it's a Communist government and that Communism was correct. If they drop that idea then they lose all legitimacy.(CITATION NEEDED) Ask any Chinese person what Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is and be prepared for a fun ride into either eye rolling or meaningless slogans.(LOGIC DOES NOT FOLLOW) (CITATION NEEDED)

Saying that China is embracing Communism and the Party supports a future transition to Full COmmunism and then throwing out some shitty university's School of Communism webpage is like saying the USA's policy is dictated by Noam Chomsky at premiere American university Massachussetts Institute of Technology.(EMPTY CLAIM) (IRRELEVANT)

Everything going on in the CCP now is designed to ferret out the followers of Jiang Zemin (CITATION NEEDED) as Xi Jinping solidifies his completely authoritarian control over the party.(EMPTY CLAIM) (CITATION NEEDED) (NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH WIDESPREAD DATA) He's circumvented everyone in the Politburo Standing Committee and created 'Working Groups' to take over the functioning of departments of state.(CITATION NEEDED) (EMPTY BOURGEOIS CONCEPTION OF THE STATE) Imagine if every department in the US was controlled by a powerful dude who got to treat it as his own personal fiefdom (I'm not being sexist they're all dudes).(CITATION NEEDED) (ORIENTAL CLAIM) (EMPTY BOURGEOIS CONCEPTION OF THE STATE) Then the American president, who previously had to work via cooperation and coercion to get stuff done through these people in charge of the departments in a completely opaque and non-democratic way,(CITATION NEEDED) (EMPTY CLAIM) (EMPTY BOURGEOIS CONCEPTION OF THE STATE) decides to create a Secretary of Energy Helper position and takes over the control of the Dept. of Energy. Since he's made clear he will drop people for corruption for not playing ball, you essentially let him do it. Because everyone at every level of Chinese government is corrupt and has practiced malfeasance and cooked the books to get promoted to their current level of power,(CITATION NEEDED) (EMPTY CLAIM) (EMPTY BOURGEOIS CONCEPTION OF THE STATE) when you're arresting and ruining people for corruption, then everyone is on the line.(LOGIC DOES NOT FOLLOW) This is possible because no one is expected to follow the law in China, because the law doesnt matter.(CITATION NEEDED) (EMPTY CLAIM) The institutions of state are meaningless.(EMPTY CLAIM) The 'Governor' of Tibet is an ethnic Tibetan, but the CCP Party Secretary of Tibet is where the actual decisions are made.(CITATION NEEDED) There isn't even a separate track for government/party promotion.(EMPTY CLAIM) If you do a 'good job' as governor of a province you might be promoted to party secretary of that province and have some real power. Same is true of city governments.(EMPTY CLAIM)

When you take the bullshit of Communism in China seriously then you reveal your complete ignorance because not even the Chinese take it seriously,(CITATION NEEDED) (ORIENTAL CLAIM) so why do you think you know better than them?

l4fQh8E3eKY

This is the purpose of COmmunism in China now, a bunch of fat rich old men (CITATION NEEDED) clap for Red Songs then go out to raid the pension fund (CITATION NEEDED) and use the money to buy houses in Los Angeles ARGH YOURE SO FUCKING STUPID!!! *hits own head with frying pan* (CITATION NEEDED)

#188
Hope that helps comrades who instead of scientific investigation, want to reduce their understanding of a country with 1 billion people in it to a single post made by a ironic nazi guy. Cheer
#189
what do you mean by "empty claim", "oriental claim" and "empty bourgeois conception of the state"
#190

Panopticon posted:

what do you mean by "empty claim", "oriental claim" and "empty bourgeois conception of the state"



what do words mean

#191
okay
#192

Panopticon posted:

okay



the state is an instrument of class rule. "establishing schools of ideological control and nationalism"; "a completely opaque and non-democratic way"; "personal fiefdom" are just 'totalitarianism' given new life. Marxists understand that power is always being exercised, the questions are for whom? in what class interest? is the law of value determinate in policy? what international policy does the state have towards imperialism and oppressed peoples? what is the level of bureaucratization?

Individuals have very little role to play against the coercive laws of competition and the falling rate of profit. Sadly, the sentences I highlighted were long used to describe Nazi Germany but have been shown to be useless and the opposite of the truth (the Nazi state was weak and dysfunctional at all levels and was compelled by the logic of imperialism to act the way it did) but still remain common descriptors of communist states because western IR scholarship is so basically Nazi science.

#193
if there are really that many multibillionaires in the chinese legislature it seems that the chinese state is firmly in the hands of the chinese capitalist class
#194
not sure if you're joking, but the entire people's congress only meets once a year and has almost no political power. seats there are not a whole lot different from an honourary degree, a ticket to an inauguration or some other prestige appointment. if it were real, china would be a multi-party pariamentary democracy, seeing as how the United Front party "controls" like 30% of the seats. that's why it's disingenuous to call them "lawmakers" knowing that it will be interpreted in a certain way by westerners

the other political organ that fsad cited as a den of corruption is not even part of the state. it's a consultative conference that includes yao ming and jackie chan as members, where famous chinese people get their pictures taken by the media and give speeches on the importance of eating healthy and saving the rainforest
#195
#196
it's obvious that corruption exists everywhere capitalism does and that first world states' institutional corruption is equivalent to bribery and graft elsewhere. while corruption is equally prevalent, the average citizen's lived experience of that corruption differs.

in western states the corruption takes place behind a screen of formal/legal rules, when it moves outside of that sphere it's seen as an aberration and results in at least some outcry (massive donations to a superpac okay, cash in a briefcase exchanged for favors bad. funding the campaigns of developer-friendly city councilmen fine, giving the zoning board new cars in exchange for a building permit bad). corruption is concentrated at the decision-making and policy level, while the bureaucracy generally speaking operates above the board in its day-to-day work. (try bribing someone at the DMV to give you a license without taking the test, for example) as a result, people tend to have a lot more faith in the reliability/accountability of the institutions they interact with on a regular basis. that doesn't mean they aren't corrupt, just that the corruption is less visible.

in many other countries (i can only speak for panama, but it's in line with other stuff posted here) every interaction the average citizen has with their government involves some sort of exchange of money or other influence for favors. overt bribery of people in positions of public trust is a fact of life, and it's exhausting and demoralizing for citizens. also it has the effect of making government services inaccessible for the poorest. (in panama it was common for people to have pay bribes to get put on public assistance) the corruption extends much further down into the civil service than it does here and as a result people feel the corruption in a much more direct and personal way.
#197
...but that's probably one of the reasons why lots of the newer immigrants my partner and I work with are so frustrated by american bureaucratic rules, lots of em are like "what do you mean i cant get SNAP if i don't have my papers, can't we just, y'know, work something out with the secretary?!" and then over time as they assimilate pretty much all of them comment at some point how much better things are here since the funcionarios here follow the rules and nobody has to pay any propinas. try explaining to an immigrant with a headful of dat american dream that things are just as rigged here, it doesnt go well
#198
[account deactivated]
#199

dank_xiaopeng posted:

...but that's probably one of the reasons why lots of the newer immigrants my partner and I work with are so frustrated by american bureaucratic rules, lots of em are like "what do you mean i cant get SNAP if i don't have my papers, can't we just, y'know, work something out with the secretary?!" and then over time as they assimilate pretty much all of them comment at some point how much better things are here since the funcionarios here follow the rules and nobody has to pay any propinas. try explaining to an immigrant with a headful of dat american dream that things are just as rigged here, it doesnt go well

yyou have a "partner"? that sounds pretty gay. nice

#200
love, the virus that causes success aids